Does father's unemployment put the fetus at risk?
Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07969.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 93, Issue 7, pages 704–710, July 1986
Additional Information
How to Cite
GOLDING, J., THOMAS, P. and PETERS, T. (1986), Does father's unemployment put the fetus at risk?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 93: 704–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07969.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 23 AUG 2005
- Received 12 February 1985, Accepted 30 September 1985
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. Information concerning 15037 singleton deliveries in 1970 showed that among the 3.5% where the male head of the household was unemployed there was no significant excess of low birthweight or pre-term delivery, once social class had been taken into account. There were major differences, however, in maternal health behaviour. In order to ascertain whether the health behaviour might be a consequence of the unemployment, data were also analysed for the 658 pregnancies in women whose husbands, though employed at delivery, were subsequently unemployed. Almost identical patterns were found, implying that the association with health behaviour was not a time-related consequence of unemployment.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)