1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
Antenatal care; current practice in debate
Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06566.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology")
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 95, Issue 9, pages 836–840, September 1988
Additional Information
How to Cite
HERINGA, M. P. and HUISJES, H. J. (1988), Antenatal care; current practice in debate. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 95: 836–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06566.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Received 6 July 1987, Accepted 6 November 1987
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. The antenatal screening practice of 67 teaching hospitals in the European Community was assessed by use of a written questionnaire. There were minor differences in mean numbers of tests performed in different countries, but only limited agreement was found on the selection of tests that were performed. There was no unity of practice within the countries. No correlations were found between the number of screening tests performed and the size of the units, or the composition of the attending staff.