Fetomaternal macrotransfusion in the Yorkshire region. 1. Prevalence and obstetric factors
Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06792.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 95, Issue 11, pages 1144–1151, November 1988
Additional Information
How to Cite
LI, T. C., BROMHAM, D. R. and BALMER, B. M. (1988), Fetomaternal macrotransfusion in the Yorkshire region. 1. Prevalence and obstetric factors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 95: 1144–1151. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06792.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Received 14 August 1987, Accepted 15 March 1988
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. The prevalence of fetomaternal macrotransfusion (FMMT), defined as fetomaternal haemorrhage (FMH) ≥10 ml, was calculated in a series of 15 724 postpartum Kleihauer tests recorded in six hospitals. The mean prevalence in this retrospective survey, the largest published to date, was 0.83% (SEM 0.22) but values varied according to the technique used to quantify the volume of FMH. A number of obstetric factors that have been suggested as influencing the occurrence and extent of FMMT were examined. The frequencies of these factors in cases with FMMT were compared with those in a control group without FMMT selected from the same population. Manual removal of the placenta (P<0.0001) and fetal distress in labour (P<0.0001) occurred significantly more frequently in the case group. We are unable to confirm previous reports that other obstetric factors may influence the occurrence and extent of FMMT.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)