Kielland's forceps or ventouse—a comparison
Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12801.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 95, Issue 5, pages 483–487, May 1988
Additional Information
How to Cite
HERABUTYA, Y., O-PRASERTSAWAT, P. and BOONRANGSIMANT, P. (1988), Kielland's forceps or ventouse—a comparison. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 95: 483–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12801.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Received 8 January 1987, Accepted 12 July 1987
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Summary. A retrospective study over a 3-year period compared maternal and neonatal outcomes after birth by Kielland's forceps with those by ventouse when there was deep transverse arrest of head. Of the 259 women, 117 were delivered with Kielland's forceps and 142 were delivered with the ventouse. Of the Kielland's forceps deliveries, 15% were performed by a specialist, compared with 41% of the vacuum extractions. There were no differences in maternal morbidity overall, but when groups of operators were compared maternal complications were more frequent in the forceps group with the less experienced operators. There was little early neonatal morbidity (as judged by Apgar score, intubation, admission to the special care baby unit, jaundice and abnormal neurological behaviour) but cephalhaematoma occurred significantly more often in babies born by the ventouse than by Kielland's forceps. There were no perinatal deaths.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)