Get access

Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology

Authors

  • Douglas G. Altman,

    Head of Medical Statistics Laboratory, Corresponding author
    1. Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London
      Mr D. G. Altman, Medical Statistics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, PO Box 123, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lyn S. Chitty

    Research Fellow
    1. Department of Clinical Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London
    Search for more papers by this author

Mr D. G. Altman, Medical Statistics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, PO Box 123, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK.

ABSTRACT

Objectives To discuss the features of study design and analysis which are necessary to derive valid reference centiles for fetal size. To describe a study which meets the stated criteria.

Design Prospective study of 663 fetuses.

Results The selection of the sample and adequate sample size are of great importance. Prospective collection of data specifically for the purpose of deriving centiles is recommended. It is essential to use statistical methods that take proper account of the increasing variation among fetuses as pregnancy proceeds; such methods are described and illustrated. A study is described which meets the stated criteria for design and analysis, and from which new fetal size centile charts have been derived and are presented in subsequent papers.

Conclusions Many published studies containing charts (standards) of fetal size are methodologically flawed. Research design and statistical analysis must adhere to sound principles for fitted centiles of size to be valid and so clinically relevant.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary