SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Effect of oxytocin and oral prostaglandin E2 on uterine contractility and fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 403407.
  • 2
    Calder AA, Embrey MP, Hillier K. Extra-amniotic prostaglandin E2for the induction of labour at term. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comnwlth 1974; 81: 3946.
  • 3
    Thiery M. Pre-induction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol Ann 1983; 12: 103146.
  • 4
    Cocks DP. Significance of initial condition of cervix uteri to subsequent course of labour. BMJ 1955; 1: 327328.
  • 5
    Shepherd JH, Knuppel RA. The role of prostaglandins in ripening the cervix and inducing labor. Clin Perinatal 1981; 8: 4962.
  • 6
    Mackenzie IZ, Bradley S, Embrey MP. A simple approach to labor induction using lipid-based prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppository. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 158162.
  • 7
    Atad J, Bomstein J, Calderon I, Petrikovsky BM, Sorokin Y, Abramovici H. Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 146152.
  • 8
    Calder AA, Embrey MP. Comparison of intravenous oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour automatic and non-automatic infusion techniques. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 728733.
  • 9
    Mahmood TA. A prospective comparative study on the use of prostaglandin E2 gel (2 mg) and prostaglandin E2 tablet (3 mg) for the induction of labour in primigravid women with unfavorable cervices. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 33: 169175.
  • 10
    Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comnwlth 1967; 74: 4448.
  • 11
    Ezimokhai M, Nwabiweli JN. The use of Foley's catheter in ripening the unfavourable cervix prior to induction of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 281286.
  • 12
    Thomas IL, Chenoweth JN, Tronc GN, Johnson IR. Preparation for induction of labour of the unfavourable cervix with Foley catheter compared with vaginal prostaglandin. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 26: 3035.