You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Routine ultrasound dating has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method

  1. Ole Olsen Statistician1,
  2. Jette Aaroe Clausen Lecturer (Midwifery)2

Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005

DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10965.x

Issue

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Volume 104, Issue 11, pages 1221–1222, November 1997

Additional Information

How to Cite

Olsen, O. and Aaroe Clausen, J. (1997), Routine ultrasound dating has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 104: 1221–1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10965.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark

  2. 2

    The Danish Midwifery School, Aalborg, Denmark

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 19 AUG 2005
  2. Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (227K)

No abstract is available for this article.

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (227K)