• 1
    Quilligan E, Paul RH. Fetal monitoring: is it worth it Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45:96100.
  • 2
    Shenker L, Post RC, Seiler JS. Routine electronic monitoring of the fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labour. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 46: 185189.
  • 3
    Tutera G, Newman RL. Fetal monitoring; its effect on perinatal mortality and caesaeran section rates and its complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122: 750754.
  • 4
    Amato JC. Fetal monitoring in a community hospital. A statistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 50: 269274.
  • 5
    Macdonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers I. The Dublin randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 524539.
  • 6
    Neilson JP. Cardiotocography during labour. An unsatisfactory technique but nothing better yet. BMJ 1993; 306: 347348.
  • 7
    Umstad MP. The predictive value of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns in early labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 33: 145149.
  • 8
    Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT. A randomised trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 899907.
  • 9
    Prentice A, Lind T. Fetal heart rate monitoring during labour—too frequent intervention, too little benefit Lancet 1987; 2: 13751377.
  • 10
    Neilson JP. EFM + scalp sampling vs intermittent auscultation in labour. In: NeilsonJP, CrowtherCA, HodnettED, HofmeyrGJ, KeirseMJNC, editors. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database; Issue 1; 1995. Oxford : Update Software, 1995.
  • 11
    SpencerJAD, WardRHT, editors. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance. London : RCOG Press, 1993.
  • 12
    Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelson C, Nim J. Intra and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 421424.
  • 13
    Donker DK. Inter-observer variation in the assessment of the fetal heart recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 52: 2128.
  • 14
    Beck GJ. The clinical application of epidemiology and the interpretation of diagnostic tests. In: MatzenRN, SlangR, editors. Principles of Preventive Medicine and Clinical Prevention. St Louis , Missouri : Mosby, 1993:106.
  • 15
    Sokel RR, Rolf FJ. Biometry. New York : WH Freeman & Co, 1981: 765.
  • 16
    Renou P, Chang A, Anderson 1, Wood C. Controlled trial of fetal intensive care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126:470476.
  • 17
    Haverkamp AD, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, McFee J, Murphy J, Thompson HE. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intra- partum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 399412.
  • 18
    Wood C, Renou P, Oats J, Farrell E, Beischer N, Anderson I. A con- trolled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric popu- lation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 527534.
  • 19
    Neldam S, Osier M, Hansen PK, Nim J, Smith SF, Hertel J. Intrapartum fetal monitoring in a combined low- and high-risk popu- lation: a controlled clinical trial. Ear J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986; 23: 111.
  • 20
    Luthy DA, Shy KK, Van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, Benedetti TJ, Brown ZA, Effer S, King JF, Stenchever MA. A randomised trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor. Obstet Gvnecol 1987; 69:687695.
  • 21
    Beard RW, Morris ED, Clayton SG. pH of capillary blood as an indi- cator of the condition of the fetus. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comnwlth 1974; 74: 812822.
  • 22
    Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JSH, Greene KR. Plymouth ran- domised trial of cardiotocography alone versus ST waveform analysis plus cardiotocography for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 11511160.
  • 23
    Thacker SB. Effectiveness and safety of intrapartum fetal monitoring. In: SpencerJAD. Fetal Monitoring. Castle House Publications, 1989: 211217.
  • 24
    Ellenberg JH, Nelson KB. Cluster of perinatal events identifying infants at high risk for death or disability. J Pediatr 1988; 113: 546552.
  • 25
    Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Bums J, Williams ML, Little BB. Diagnosis of birth asphyxia on the basis of fetal pH, apgar score, and newborn cerebral dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 825.
  • 26
    Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Guzman ER, Knuppel 10. RA, Lake M, Schifrin BS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 149155.
  • 27
    Banta DH, Thacker SB. Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1979; 34: 627642.
  • 28
    Murphy KW, Johnson P, Moorcraft J, Pattison R, Russell V, Turnbull SA. Birth asphyxia and the intrapartum cardiotocograph. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 470479.
  • 29
    Chung TKH, Mohajer MP, Yang ZJ, Chang AMZ. The pre- diction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 454460.
  • 30
    Devoe LD. The nonstress test. In: EdenRD, BoehmFH. Assess- ment and Care of the Fetus. Prentice-Hall International Inc, 1990: 376.