Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study

Authors

  • T. K. Lau,

    Associate Professor , Corresponding author
    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Keith W. K. Lo,

    Medical Officer
    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Search for more papers by this author
  • D. Wan,

    Research Fellow
    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael S. Rogers

    Professor
    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence: Dr T. K. Lau, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.

Abstract

Objective To investigate clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of outcome of external cephalic version at term.

Design Prospective observational study.

Setting University obstetric unit.

Population All external cephalic versions performed over two years (n=243).

Methods Nineteen different clinical and ultrasonographic variables were recorded before each procedure. The ability of each of the 19 variables to predict the success or failure of external cephalic version was assessed by univariate analysis. The study population was then divided into two subgroups of 129 and 114 patients by random allocation using computer generated numbers. Logistic regression was performed in each subgroup to assess the relative importance and independence of the important variables. The derived regression models were then applied to the other subgroup of patients to assess accuracy and reproducibility.

Results The overall success rate of the procedure was 69.5%. Both regression models identified the same three variables as independent predictors of failed versions: 1. presenting part engaged; 2. difficult to palpate the fetal head, and 3. a tense uterus on palpation. The two models correctly predicted 75.2% and 84.2% of outcomes in the other subgroup. If uterine tone, which was assessed after administration of tocolytic, was excluded from the analysis, the other two factors remained in the models, with the addition of nulliparity as a significant predictor of failed external cephalic version. The chance of success of external cephalic version in the original 243 women was found to be < 20% if two of these variables were present, 0% if all three were present, and 94% if none were present.

Conclusions The outcome of external cephalic version can be predicted by easily available clinical parameters.

Ancillary