You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Perinatal pathology: centralise or perish?
Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09340.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 105, Issue 1, pages 5–7, January 1998
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rushton, D. I. (1998), Perinatal pathology: centralise or perish?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 105: 5–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09340.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 19 AUG 2005
References
- 1, The Autopsy—Medical Practice and Public Poky. Boston : Butterworths, 1988: 57.
- 2, , A study of perinatal autopsy quality in the former Northern Region (to be inserted).
- 3, A regional audit of perinatal and infant autopsies in Northern Ireland (to be inserted).
- 4West Midlands perinatal mortality survey 1987. An audit of 300 perinatal autopsies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 624–627.
- 5, , All Wales perinatal survey and confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy Annual Report 1996. Perinatal Survey Office Department of Child Health University of Wales College of Medicine, 1997: 62.
- 6Royal College of Pathologists. Guidelines for post mortem reports. London : Royal College of Pathologists, 1993.
- 7Should perinatal post mortems be carried out by specialist pathologists Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 182–185.
- 8, , et al. Postnatal encephaloclastic porencephaly—a new lesion Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 307–311.
- 9, , , Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging Lancet 1996; 348: 1139–1141.
- 10, . Requesting necropsies. BMJ 1997; 314: 1499–1500.
- 11, , The Allitt Inquiry. London : HMSO, 1994.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)