SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Hage ML. Interpretation of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 153155.
  • 2
    Paneth N, Bommarito M, Stricker J. Electronic fetal monitoring and later outcome. Clin InvestMed 1993; 16: 159165.
  • 3
    Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1987; 25: 159167.
  • 4
    Spencer JAD, Badawi N, Burton P, Keogh J, Pemberton P, Stanley F. The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 2528.
  • 5
    Grant JM. The fetal heart rate is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancer 1991; 337 215218.
  • 6
    Shoukri MM, Edge VL. Statistical Methods for Health Sciences. New York : CRC Press; 1996.
  • 7
    Keith RDF, Beckley S, Garibald JM, Westgate JA, Ifeachor EC, Greene KR. A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the cardiotocogram. Br J Obsret Gynaecol 1995; 102: 688700.
  • 8
    Barrett JFR, Jarvis GJ, MacDonald HN, Buchan PC, Tyrrell SN, Lilford RJ. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics. Lancet 1990; 336: 549551. 1985; 153: 153–155.