• 1
    RCOG Recommendations arising from the 26th RCOG study group: fetal blood sampling. In: SpencerJAD, WardRHT, editors. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance. London : RCOG Press, 1993: 392.
  • 2
    Grant A. Monitoring the fetus in labour. In: ChalmersI, EnkinM, KeirseMJNC, editors. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1989: 846882.
  • 3
    Thacker SB, Stroup DF. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation for assessment during labour. In The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 1999. Oxford : Update Software.
  • 4
    Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (1997) 4th Annual Report. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium 1997. Chiltern Court, 188 Baker Street, London NW1 5SD.
  • 5
    Catanzarite VA. FMTUTOR: a computer-aided instructional system for teaching fetal monitor interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 10451048.
  • 6
    Gall SA, Eden RA, Gall SA. Education in electronic fetal heart rate monitoring using the IBM personal microcomputer. Am J Perinatol 1985; 2: 154155.
  • 7
    Murray ML, Higgins P. Computer versus lecture: strategies for teaching fetal monitoring. J Perinatol 1996; 16: 1519.
  • 8
    Keith RDF, Beckley SL, Garibaldi JM, Westgate JA, Ifeachor EC, Greene KR. A multicentre comparative study of 17 experts and an intelligent computer system for managing labour using the car-diotocogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 688700.
  • 9
    Glendon AI, McKenna SP, Hunt K, Blaylock SS. Variables affecting cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill decay. J Occup Psychol 1988; 61: 243255.
  • 10
    Landauer TK, Bjork RA. Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In: GrunenbergMM, MorrisPE, SykesRN, editors. Practical Aspects of Memory. London : Academic Press, 1978.
  • 11
    Rose RJ. Degree of learning, interpolated tests, and rate of forgetting. Mem Cognit 1992; 20: 621632.
  • 12
    Keinan G, Friedland N, Sarig-Naor V. Training for task performance under stress: the effectiveness of phased training methods. J Appl Soc Psychol 1990; 20: 15141529.
  • 13
    Ramirez AG, Weaver FJ, Raizner AE, Dorfman SB, Herrick KL, Gotto A. The efficacy of lay CPR instruction: an evaluation. Am J Public Health 1977; 67: 10931095.
  • 14
    Guild SD. A comprehensive fetal monitoring program for nursing practice and education. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1993; 23: 3441.
  • 15
    Eganhouse DJ. Electronic fetal monitoring. Education and quality assurance. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1990; 20: 1622.
  • 16
    Clark RE. Confounding in educational computing research. J Educ Comp Res 1985; 1: 137148.
  • 17
    Brown RL, Carlson BL. Early diagnosis of substance abuse: evaluation of a course of computer-assisted instruction. Med Educ. 1990; 24: 438446.
  • 18
    Poses RM, Randall DC, Cebul MD et al., Controlled trial using computerised feedback to improve physicians' diagnostic judgements. Acad Med. 1992; 67: 345347.
  • 19
    Lyon HC, Healy JC Bell JR et al., Findings from an evaluation of PlanAlyzer's double cross-over trials of computer-based, self-paced, case-based programs in anemia and chest pain diagnosis [abstract]. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991: 8893.
  • 20
    Desch LW, Esquivel MT, Anderson SK. Comparison of a computer tutorial with other methods for teaching well-newborn care. Am J Dis Child 1991; 145: 12551258.