Anti-E in pregnancy
Article first published online: 12 AUG 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11662.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 107, Issue 11, pages 1436–1438, November 2000
Additional Information
How to Cite
Moran, P., Robson, S. C. and Reid, M. M. (2000), Anti-E in pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 107: 1436–1438. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11662.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 12 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 12 AUG 2005
- Accepted 27 July 2000
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Since the introduction of anti-Rhesus (Rh) D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women, other Rh and non-Rh red cell alloantibodies have become relatively more important and are now responsible for the greater proportion of haemolytic disease of the newborn. Anti-C and anti-E are the most commonly implicated non-D Rh antibodies in the pathogenesis of haemolytic disease of the newborn1. In 1977 Pepperell et al.2 reported the outcome of 44 women with anti-E. This is the only published series that investigates the implications of anti-E during pregnancy. The present report presents a retrospective study of the outcome of 122 pregnancies in which anti-E was the sole alloantibody detected.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)