SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Greenleaf JE. Physiological responses to prolonged bed rest and fluid immersion in humans. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57: 619633.
  • 2
    Epstein M. Renal effects of head-out water immersion in man: implications for an understanding of volume homeostasis. Physiol Rev 1978; 58: 529581.
  • 3
    Hall J, Bisson D, O'Hare P. The physiology of immersion. Physiotherapy 1990; 76: 517521.
  • 4
    Rabelink AJ. On the renal response to head-out water immersion. PhD thesis; Utrecht University: 1990.
  • 5
    Duvekot JJ, Peeters LH. Renal hemodynamics and volume hemostasis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49: 830839.
  • 6
    Katz VL, Ryder RM, Cefalo RC, Carmichael SC, Goolsby R. A comparison of bed rest and immersion for treating the edema of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 147151.
  • 7
    Katz VL, Rozas L, Ryder RM, Cefalo RC. Effect of daily immersion on the edema of pregnancy. Am J Perinat 199; 9: 225227.
  • 8
    Katz VL, McMurray R, Berry MJ, Cefalo RC. Fetal and uterine responses to immersion and exercise. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 225230.
  • 9
    Goodlin RC, Engdahl Hoffmann KL, Williams NE, Buchan P. Shoulderout immersion in pregnant women. J Perinat Med 1984; 173: 173177.
  • 10
    Strong TH. Reversal of oligohydramnios with subtotal immersion. A report of five cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 15951597.
  • 11
    Goodlin RC, Anderson JC, Gallagher TF. Relationship between amniotic fluid volume and maternal plasma volume expansion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 505511.
  • 12
    Franx A, Van der Post JAM, Elfering IM et al. Validation of automated blood pressure recording in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 6669.
  • 13
    Shernan AH, Kissane J, De Swiet M. Validation of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 904908.
  • 14
    O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Halligan A, O'Malley K. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hypertens 1993; 11 (Suppl 5): S282S283.
  • 15
    Heethaar RM, van Oppen ACC, Ottenhoff FA, Brouwer FAS, Bruinse HW. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: suitable for monitoring stroke volume during pregnancy Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 58: 183190.
  • 16
    van Oppen ACC, van der Tweel I, Duvekot JJ, Bruinse HW. Use of cardiac index in pregnancy: Is it justified Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 923928.
  • 17
    Arduini D, Rizzo G, Piana G, Bonalumi A, Brambilla P, Romanini C. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate: I. Description of the system (2 CTG). J Matern Fetal Invest 1993; 3: 165168.
  • 18
    Arduini D, Rizzo G, Giannini F, Garzetti GG, Romanini C. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate: II Comparison with the interpretation of Experts. J Matern Fetal Invest 1993; 3: 165168.
  • 19
    Hays WL. Statistics. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1989.
  • 20
    Crowther CA, Bouwmeester AM, Ashurst HM. Does admission to hospital for bed rest prevent disease progression or improve fetal outcome in pregnancy complicated by non-proteinuric hypertension Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 1317.
  • 21
    Laurin J, Persson PH. The effect of bedrest in hospital on fetal outcome in pregnancies complicated by intra-uterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 407411.
  • 22
    Karsdorp VHM, van Vught JMG, Dekker GA, van Geyn HP. Reappearance of end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery following maternal volume expansion: a preliminary study. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 679683.