SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Crowley P. Interventions to prevent or improve outcome from labour at or beyond term. The Cochrane Library, Oxford: Update Software Issue 1:2001.
  • 2
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson S, Milner R, Willan A, Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 15871592.
  • 3
    Maternal–Fetal Medicine Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Post-term pregnancy (Committee Opinion). SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines, No. 15, 1997.
  • 4
    Hall PF. The consensus cult. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 2000;22: 8.
  • 5
    Feldman GB. Prospective risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79: 547553.
  • 6
    Minakami H, Kimura H, Honma Y, Tamada T, Sato I. When is the optimal time for delivery?—purely from the fetuses' perspective. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995;40: 174178.
  • 7
    Ingemarsson I, Kallen K. Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 post term pregnancies in Sweden, 1982–1991: a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76: 658662.
  • 8
    Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 169173.
  • 9
    Widjaja AH, Mantell CD. Stillbirths in Auckland 1983–1986. NZ Med J 1988;101: 768770.
  • 10
    Yudkin PL, Wood L, Redman CWG. Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages. Lancet 1987;1: 11921194.
  • 11
    Henry GR. A controlled trial of surgical induction of labour and amnioscopy in the management of prolonged pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1969;76: 795798.
  • 12
    Bergsjø P, Gui-dan H, Su-qin Y, Zhi-zeng G, Bakketeig L. Comparison of induced versus non-induced labour in post-term pregnancy: a randomized prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68: 683687.
  • 13
    Dyson DC, Miller PD, Armstrong MA. Management of prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor versus antepartum fetal testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156: 928934.
  • 14
    Cardozo L, Fysh J, Pearce JM. Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate. BMJ 1986;293: 10591063.
  • 15
    Hannah ME. Postterm pregnancy: should all women have labour induced? A review of the literature. Fet Mat Med Rev 1993;5: 317.
  • 16
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • 17
    Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw SA. A randomized controlled trial of simple compared with complex antenatal fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102: 638643.
  • 18
    Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Sykora K. Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance: pathophysiology or practice style?. JAMA 1996;275: 11991200.
  • 19
    Levine AB, Lockwood CJ, Brown B, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Sonographic diagnosis of the large for gestational age fetus at term: does it make a difference?. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79: 5558.
  • 20
    Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P. Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77: 643648.
  • 21
    Cnattingius R, Cnattingius S, Notzon FC. Obstacles to reducing cesarean rates in a low-cesarean setting: the effect of maternal age, height, and weight. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92: 501506.
  • 22
    Agustsson T, Geirsson RT, Mires G. Obstetric outcome of natural and assisted conception twin pregnancies is similar. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76: 4549.
  • 23
    Stewart PJ, Duhlberg C, Arnett AC, Elmslie T, Hall PF. Diagnosis of dystocia and management with caesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa Carleton. CMAJ 1990;142: 459463.
  • 24
    Xenakis EM-J, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavourable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90: 235239.
  • 25
    Smith LP, Nagourney BA, McLean FH, et al. Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148: 579585.
  • 26
    Macer J, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166: 16901697.
  • 27
    Buist R, Ranchhod N. Induction of labour: indications and obstetric outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital. N Z Med J 1999;112: 151153.
  • 28
    Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95: 917922.
  • 29
    Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182: 13551362.
  • 30
    Seyb ST, Berca RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94: 600607.
  • 31
    Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 628633.
  • 32
    Lange I, Page R, Mah A, Yee J. Comparison of LSCS rates for induced vs spontaneous labour in low risk primigravids [poster presentation SOGC Conference, Calgary, Alberta]Southern Alberta Perinatal Audit Program Bulletin 1995: 5(2)
  • 33
    Stephenson PA, Bakoula C, Hemminki E, et al. Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1993;7: 4554.
  • 34
    Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 278281.
  • 35
    Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Brumfield CG, Foster JM. Prematurity, postdates, and growth retardation: the influence of use of ultrasonography on reported gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160: 462470.
  • 36
    McIntyre KM. Medicolegal implications of consensus statements. Chest 1995;108(Suppl):502S505S.
  • 37
    Hyams AL, Brandenburg JA, Lipsitz SR, Shapiro DW, Brennen TA. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med 1995;122: 450455.
  • 38
    Hirshfeld EB. Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation?. JAMA 1991;266: 28862891.
  • 39
    Cook RI, Woods DD. Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In: BognerMS, editor. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994: 255310.
  • 40
    Woolf SH, Kamerow DB. Testing for uncommon conditions: the heroic search for positive results. Arch Int Med 1990;150: 24512458.
  • 41
    Menticoglou SM, Perlman M, Manning FA. High cervical spinal cord injury in neonates delivered with forceps: report of 15 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86: 589594.
  • 42
    Bergsjø P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O. Duration of human singleton pregnancy: a population based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990;69: 197207.
  • 43
    Baskett TF, Nagele F. Naegele's rule: a reappraisal. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 14331435.
  • 44
    Stubblefield PG, Berek JS. Perinatal mortality in term and post-term births. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56: 676682.
  • 45
    Chalmers I, Richards M. Intervention and causal inferences in obstetric practice. In: ChardT, editor. Benefits and hazards of the new obstetrics Clin Devel Med 1977: 64: 3461.