What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries
Article first published online: 22 DEC 2003
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 109, Issue 5, pages 498–504, May 2002
How to Cite
MacKenzie, I.Z. and Cooke, I. (2002), What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 109: 498–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01323.x
- Issue published online: 22 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 22 DEC 2003
- Accepted 13 February 2002
- 1Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. Can Med Assoc J 1986;134: 1348–1352., , , et al.
- 2Maternal & Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. 7th Annual Report, 2000:41–52.
- 4Has ‘Changing Childbirth’ increased caesarean section rates?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105(Suppl 17):65., , .
- 5Caesarean section for fetal distress, the interval from decision to delivery, and the relative risk of poor neonatal condition. J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;11: 241–244., , , , .
- 10Intrapartum cardiotocogram, Apgar score and acidaemia at birth: relationship to neonatal neurological morbidity. In: KubliF, et al, editors. Perinatal Events and Brain Damage. Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag, 1987: 168., .