SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Home and Health Department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1991–3 London : HMSO, 1997.
  • 2
    Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Home and Health department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Report On Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1988–90 London : HMSO, 1994.
  • 3
    Lilford RJ, Van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore P, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97: 883892.
  • 4
    Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Gravenhorst JB. Maternal mortality after caesarean section in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1997;76: 332334.
  • 5
    Hall M. In: ChamberlainG, PatelN, editors. Audit in the Future of the Maternity Services. London : RCOG Press, 1994.
  • 6
    Hall MF, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet 1999;354: 776.
  • 7
    Frigoletto FD, Ryan FJ, Phillipe M. Maternal mortality associated with cesarean section: an appraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136: 969970.
  • 8
    Pettitti DB, Cefalo RC, Shapiro S, Whally P. In hospital maternal mortality in the United States: Time trends and relation to method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1992;59: 612.
  • 9
    Moldin P, Hokegard K, Nielson TF. Cesarean section and maternal mortality in Sweden 1973–1979. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 1984;63: 711.
  • 10
    Rouse DJ, Owen J, Goldberg RL, Cliver SP. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA 1996;276: 14801486.
  • 11
    Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001. Oxford: Update Software.
  • 12
    Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. A case–control study to identify the incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity. BMJ 2001;322: 10891093.
  • 13
    Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit The National Sentinal Caesarean Section Audit Report. London : RCOG Press, 2001: 29.
  • 14
    Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long term effects of cesarean section: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 15691574.
  • 15
    Lo JY, Hartley CC, Wendal GD. Uterine evacuation complicated by hysterectomy: an association with prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(Suppl):S151.
  • 16
    Chen F C-K, von Dehn D, Buscher U, Dudenhausen JW, Miggemann B. Atopy, the use of condoms, and a history of caesarean delivery: potential predisposing factors for latex sensitisation in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181: 14611464.
  • 17
    Scholefield HJ, Sajjad Y, Morgan PR. Cutaneous endometriosis and caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;20(Suppl):S45S46.
  • 18
    Whitted R, Verma U, Boigl B, Mendez L. Does cesarean delivery increase the prevalence of adenomyosis?. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(Suppl):S83.
  • 19
    Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 2000;283: 24112416.
  • 20
    Rouse DJ, Owen J. Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography: a Faustian bargain?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181: 332338.
  • 21
    Iosif S. Stress incontinence during pregnancy and the puerperium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1981;19: 1320.
  • 22
    Beck RP, Hsu N. Pregnancy, childbirth and the menopause related to the development of stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;91: 820823.
  • 23
    King J, Freeman R. Is antenatal bladder neck mobility a risk factor for post partum stress incontinence?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 13001307.
  • 24
    Dimpfl T, Hesse U, Schussler B. Incidence and cause of postpartum urinary stress incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992;43: 2933.
  • 25
    Marshall K, Thompson KA, Walsh DM, Baxter GD. Incidence of urinary incontinence and constipation during pregnancy and post partum: survey of current findings at the Rotunda Lying-in Hospital. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 400402.
  • 26
    Keane DP, Sims TJ, Abrams P, Bailey AJ. Analysis of collagen status in premenopausal nulliparous women with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104: 994998.
  • 27
    Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103: 154161.
  • 28
    Viktrup I, Lose G, Rolf M, Barfoed K. The symptoms of stress incontinence caused by pregnancy or delivery in primiparas. Obstet Gynaecol 1992;79: 945949.
  • 29
    Beck RP, Hsu N. Pregnancy, childbirth and the menopause related to the development of stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965;91: 820823.
  • 30
    Francis WJA. The onset of stress incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1960;67: 899903.
  • 31
    Stanton SL, Kerr-Wilson R, Harris GV. The incidence of urological symptoms in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87: 897900.
  • 32
    Parys BT, Haylen BT, Woolfenden KA, Parsons KF. Vesico-urethral dysfunction after simple hysterectomy. Neurol Urodynam 1989;8: 315316.
  • 33
    Incontinence causes, management and provision of services. Summary of a Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians. J Roy Coll Physicians Lond 1995;4: 272274.
  • 34
    Dwyer PL, Lee ETC, Hay DM. Obesity and urinary incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95: 9196.
  • 35
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308: 887891.
  • 36
    Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartrum CI. Anal sphincter disruption during delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329: 19051911.
  • 37
    Girard M. Episiotomy and faecal incontinence. Lancet 1999;354: 2169.
  • 38
    Smith AR, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genito-urinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92: 824828.
  • 39
    Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence due to external sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor: a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92: 824828.
  • 40
    Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrell DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;97: 770779.
  • 41
    Sultan AH, Monga AK. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104: 754.
  • 42
    Marshall K, Walsh DM, Baxter D. Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104: 870.
  • 43
    Tetzschner T, Lose G. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104(753):754755.
  • 44
    Nygaard IE, Satish SC, Dawson JD. Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30 year retrospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89: 896901.
  • 45
    Johanson JF, Irizzarry BS, Doughty AD. Risk factors for faecal incontinence in a nursing home population. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997;24: 156160.
  • 46
    Read V, Celik AF, Katsinelos P. Constipation and incontinence in the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995;20: 6170.
  • 47
    Johanson J, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91: 3336.
  • 48
    Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103: 731734.
  • 49
    Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 593600.
  • 50
    Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women's sexual health after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 186195.
  • 51
    Hofberg K, Brockington I. Tokophobia: an unreasoning dread of childbirth. Br J Psych 2000;176: 8385.
  • 52
    Sjogren B, Thomassen P. Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76: 948952.
  • 53
    Anwar K, O'Mahoney F. Patient access to their records: rights or risks?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107: 141142.
  • 54
    Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
  • 55
    Savage W. Perinatal mortality trends. Medicine in Society 1979;5: 2026.
  • 56
    Thiery M, Derom R. Review on evaluative studies on caesarean section. Part 1: Trends in caesarean section and perinatal mortality. In: KaminskiM, editors. Perinatal Care Delivery Systems: Description and Evaluation in European Community Countries. Oxford : OUP, 1986: 93113.
  • 57
    Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000. DHSS Pub No (PHS) 91-500212, Washington DC, 1991.
  • 58
    World Health OrganizationAppropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2: 436437.
  • 59
    Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. 8th Annual Report. London : HMSO, 2001: 25.
  • 60
    Hilder L, Cotesloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 169173.
  • 61
    Cotzias CS, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Prospective risk of unexplained stillbirth in singleton pregnancies at term: population based analysis. BMJ 1999;19: 287288.
  • 62
    Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. Fourth Annual Report. London: HMSO, 1997.
  • 63
    Paterson-Brown S. Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request?. Yes as long as the woman is fully informed. BMJ 1998;317: 462463.
  • 64
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trail. Lancet 2000;356: 13751383.
  • 65
    McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes Jr WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 689695.
  • 66
    Malloy MH, Hoffman HJ. Prematurity, sudden death syndrome and age of death. Pediatrics 1995;96: 464471.
  • 67
    Stanley F, Watson L. Trends in mortality and cerebral palsy in Western Australia 1967–1985. BMJ 1992;304: 16581662.
  • 68
    Rosen MG, Chil L. The association between cesarean birth and outcome in vertex presentation: Relative importance of birthweight, Dubowitz scores and delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150: 775.
  • 69
    Illingworth RS. A paediatrician asks: why is it called birth injury?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92: 122130.
  • 70
    International Cerebral Palsy Task ForceA template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMJ 1999;319: 10541059.
  • 71
    Andres RL, Saade G, Gilstrap LC, et al. Association between umbilical blood gas parameters and neonatal morbidity and death in neonates with pathologic fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181: 867871.
  • 72
    Ingermarsson I, Herbst A, Thorngran-Jerneck K. Long term outcome after umbilical artery acidaemia at term birth: influence of gender and duration of fetal heart rate abnormalities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104: 11231127.
  • 73
    Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102: 101106.
  • 74
    Annibale DJ, Hulsey TC, Wagner CL, Southgate WM. Comparative neonatal morbidity of abdominal and vaginal deliveries after uncomplicated pregnancies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149: 862867.
  • 75
    Madar J, Richmond S, Hey E. Surfactant deficient respiratory distress after elective delivery at “term”. Acta Pediatr 1999;88: 12441284.
  • 76
    Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanoroff A, Hack M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section and trial of labour. Pediatrics 1997;100: 348353.
  • 77
    Smith JF, Hernandez C, Wax JR. Fetal laceration injury at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90: 344346.
  • 78
    Heritage CK, Cunningham MD. Association of elective repeat cesarean delivery and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152: 627629.
  • 79
    Rosenberg AA, Kennaugh JM, Moreland SG, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of newborn infants treated with inhaled nitric oxide for persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr 1997;131: 7075.
  • 80
    Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, Dero P. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: permenant changes in intestinal flora after caesarean section. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28: 1925.
  • 81
    Murch SH. Toll of allergy reduced by probiotics. Lancet 2001;357: 10571058.
  • 82
    Steer P. Caesarean section: an evolving procedure?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 10521055.
  • 83
    Purdie D. The genesis line. Lancet 1999;353: 404405.
  • 84
    Lilford R, Bryce FC. Teleology of the menopause. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;38: 8990.
  • 85
    Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
  • 86
    Poma PA. Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 13641372.
  • 87
    DeMott RK, Sandmire HF. The Green Bay cesarean section study: I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162: 15931602.
  • 88
    DeMott RK, Sandmire HF. The Green Bay cesarean section study: II. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for failed labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166: 17991810.
  • 89
    Gregory KD, Ramicone E, Chan L, Kahn KL. Cesarean deliveries for Medicaid patients: comparison in public and private hospitals in Los Angeles county. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 11771184.
  • 90
    Roberts CL, Tracy S, Peat B. Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study. BMJ 2000;321: 137141.
  • 91
    Peipert JF, Hogan JW, Gifford D, Chase E, Randall R. Strength of indication for cesarean delivery: Comparison of private physician versus resident service labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181: 435439.
  • 92
    Hopkins K. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean?. Soc Sci Med 2000;51: 725740.
  • 93
    Potter JE, Berquo E, Perpetuo IH, et al. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 2001;323: 11551158.
  • 94
    Oakley A. Women Confined: Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. Oxford : Martin Robertson & Co, 1980: 1014.
  • 95
    Williams AS. Women and Childbirth in the Twentieth Century. Stroud , Gloucestershire : Sutton Publishing Ltd, 1997: 198199
  • 96
    Tew M. Safer Childbirth? A Critical History of Maternity Care. London : Chapman & Hall, 1990.
  • 97
    Cumberledge J. Changing Childbirth. London : HMSO, 1993.
  • 98
    See Carolines Story. Harley Avon Productions Limited, Bristol 1999 (video about handling a request for caesarean section after stillbirth).
  • 99
    Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. The Green Bay cesarean section study: III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170: 17901802.
  • 100
    Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle rate to reduce cesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 199120.
  • 101
    Lagrew DC, Morgan MA. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 184191.
  • 102
    Richman VV. Setting goals for reductions in Canadian cesarean delivery rates: benchmarking medical practice patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181: 635637.