A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labour
Article first published online: 22 DEC 2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01062.x
Issue
1471-0528/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=b4e1d96c46e18c61210d584b63c13ee375cf562b)
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 109, Issue 2, pages 178–181, February 2002
Additional Information
How to Cite
Scheepers, H. C.J., Thans, M. C.J., de Jong, P. A., Essed, G. G.M., Le Cessie, S. and Kanhai, H. H.H. (2002), A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labour. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 109: 178–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.t01-1-01062.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 DEC 2003
- Article first published online: 22 DEC 2003
- Accepted 12 September 2001
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Objective Although there has been much debate on whether women should be allowed to eat and drink during labour, little scientific data are available on the effects of caloric intake on the course of labour.
Design Double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled.
Setting Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Population Two hundred and one consecutive nulliparous women, pregnant of a single fetus in cephalic presentation.
Methods All women were included in early labour (2cm–4cm of cervical dilatation) and were allowed to drink at will.
Main outcome measures The duration of labour, the need for augmentation and pain medication and the incidence of abdominal and vaginal instrumental deliveries.
Results Drinking of carbohydrate solutions was well tolerated, but did not show any beneficial effects regarding labour outcome when compared with the control group. In the carbohydrate group, a higher caesarean section rate was observed (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.29–6.54).
Conclusions Women in the carbohydrate group had worse labour outcome. It is unclear whether a statistical coincidence, a negative effect of the carbohydrate intake or an incorrect carbohydrate intake strategy is responsible for these results. Further studies are necessary before any definite conclusion can be drawn.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)