SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Health briefing. Abortion Statistics Scotland 1968–1998. Edinburgh: Information and Statistics Division of the NHS in Scotland, 2000.
  • 2
    Penney GC, Glasier A, Templeton A. A multi-centre, criterion-based audit of the management of induced abortion in Scotland. BMJ 1994;309: 1518.
  • 3
    Cameron IT, Baird DT. The return to ovulation following early abortion: a comparison between vacuum aspiration and prostaglandin. Acta Endocrinol 1988;118: 161167.
  • 4
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Guideline No. 7. London: RCOG, 2000.
  • 5
    Grimshaw J, Russell I. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342: 13171322.
  • 6
    Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8(6).
  • 7
    Effective health care. Getting Evidence into Practice. York: University of York, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 1999.
  • 8
    Penney GC, Calder AA. The Scottish Programme for clinical effectiveness in reproductive health: lessons from a three-year programme. Health Bull 2000;58: 261266.
  • 9
    Zapka JG, Lemon S, Peterson LE, Palmer H, Goldman MB. The silent consumer. Women's reports and ratings of abortion services. Med Care 2001;39: 5060.
  • 10
    Goldstein H. Multi-level Statistical Models. 2nd edition. New York: Arnold, 1995.
  • 11
    Campbell MK, Mollison J, Steen N, Grimshaw JM, Eccles M. Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach. Fam Pract 2000;17: 192196.
  • 12
    Brown MB, Forsythe AB. Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Assoc 1974;69: 364376.
  • 13
    Sculpher M. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Fam Pract 2000;17(Suppl 1):S26S31.
  • 14
    Mason J, Wood J, Freemantle N. Designing evaluations of interventions to change professional practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999;4: 106112.
  • 15
    Penney GC, Glasier A, Templeton A. Patients' views on abortion care in Scottish hospitals. Health Bull 1994;52: 431435.
  • 16
    Wilson B, Thornton JG, Hewison J, et al. The Leeds University maternity audit project. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14: 175181.
  • 17
    Wyatt JC, Paterson-Brown S, Johanson R, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ, Fisk NM. Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units. BMJ 1998;317: 10411046.
  • 18
    Cheater F, Baker R, Hearnshaw H, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. [protocol for a Cochrane review]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2003.
  • 19
    Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q 2001;79(2):281315.
  • 20
    RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Audit of Induced Abortion 2000. Report of England and Wales. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2001.
  • 21
    Donaldson LJ, Muir Gray JA. Clinical governance: a quality duty for health organisations. Qual Health Care 1998;7(Suppl):S37S44.