SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Vancaille TG, Schuessler W. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg 1991;1: 169173.
  • 2
    Schwayder JM. Laparoscopic Burch cystourethropexy compared with the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(Suppl. 4):S46S47.
  • 3
    Persson J, Wolner-Hansson P. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomised comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynaecol 2000;95: 151155.
  • 4
    Liu CY, Paek W. Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1993;1: 3135.
  • 5
    O'Shea RT, Seman E, Taylor J. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3(Suppl. 4):S36.
  • 6
    Ross JW. Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91: 5559.
  • 7
    O'Sullivan RJ, Wynn-Williams M, Cario G, et al. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Prospective 5–10 year follow up. Proceedings of the 28th International Meeting. International Urogynaecological Association, 2003. Int Urogyn J 2003.
  • 8
    Burton G. A three-year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16: 353354.
  • 9
    Su TH, Wang KG, Hsu CY, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76: 789798.
  • 10
    Carey M, Rasmilia A, Maher C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: a prospective randomised multi-centre single blind comparison. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;4: 389391.
  • 11
    Hawthorn RJS, Donaldson KF, Ramsay IN. Randomised trial of laparoscopic extra-peritoneal colposuspension versus open colposuspension. Rev Gynaecol Prac 2002;2: 5459.
  • 12
    Morris A, et al. 5–7 year follow up of a randomised trial comparing laparoscopic colposuspension versus open colposusension in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;3(Suppl. 3):231232.
  • 13
    Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson PD. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. Br J Obs Gynecol 2003;110: 230235.
  • 14
    Kohli N, Jacobs PA, Sze EH, et al. Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: a cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90: 411415.
  • 15
    Kung RC, Lie K, Lee P, et al. The cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3: 537544.
  • 16
    Loveridge K, Malouf A, Kennedy C, et al. Laparoscopic colposuspension. Is it cost effective? Surg Endosc 1997;11: 762765.
  • 17
    Paraiso MF, Walters M, Karram M. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus the tension free vaginal tape procedure: a randomised clinical trial. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Continence Society Meeting, Florence, 2003.
  • 18
    Adile B, Cucinella C, Granese R. A prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic Burch versus TVT. Short and long term follow up. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Urogynaecology Association Meeting, Buenos Aires, 2003.
  • 19
    Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, et al. Comparison of tension free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension—a randomised clinical trial: one year results. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Urogynaecology Association Meeting, Buenos Aires, 2003.
  • 20
    Ankardal M, Ekerydy A, Crafoord K, Milsom I, et al. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111: 974981.