SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH. Fetal macrosomia: prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61: 715722.
  • 2
    Neiger R. Fetal macrosomia in the diabetic patient. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35: 138150.
  • 3
    Zimmer EZ, Divon MY. Sonographic diagnosis of IUGR-macrosomia. Clinic Obstet Gynecol 1992;35: 172184.
  • 4
    Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ. Macrosomia—maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66: 158161.
  • 5
    Sacks DA, Chen W. Estimating fetal weight in the management of macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55: 229239.
  • 6
    Landon MB, Gabbe SG, Sachs L. Management of diabetes mellitus and pregnancy: a survey of obstetricians and maternal–fetal specialists. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75: 635640.
  • 7
    Deter RL, Hadlock FP. Use of ultrasound in the detection of macrosomia: a review. J Clin Ultrasound 1985;13: 519524.
  • 8
    Landon MB. Prenatal diagnosis of macrosomia in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. J Matern-Fetal Med 2000;9: 5254.
  • 9
    Rasmussen TL. The use of ultrasound to identify fetuses with macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies: a review of current literature. J Diagn Med Sonogr 2000;16: 7679.
  • 10
    Lurie S, Zalel Y, Hagay ZJ. The evaluation of accelerated fetal growth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1995;7: 477481.
  • 11
    O'Reilly-Green C, Divon M. Sonographic and clinical methods in the diagnosis of macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43: 309320.
  • 12
    Johnstone FD. Prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancy. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol 1997;9: 113120.
  • 13
    Chervenak JL. Macrosomia in the postdates pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35: 151155.
  • 14
    Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282: 10611066.
  • 15
    Cochrane Methods Working Group on Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Screening and diagnostic tests: recommended methods 1996.
  • 16
    Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323: 157162.
  • 17
    Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994;120: 667676.
  • 18
    Khan KS, Dinnes J, Kleijnen J. Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;95: 611.
  • 19
    Rennie D. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative. JAMA 2003;289: 8990.
  • 20
    Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993;12: 12931316.
  • 21
    Petitti DB. Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • 22
    Vamvakas EC. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122: 675686.
  • 23
    de Vries SO, Hunink MG, Polak JF. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease. Acad Radiol 1996;3: 361369.
  • 24
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271: 389391.
  • 25
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271: 703707.
  • 26
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7: 177188.
  • 27
    Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. Health Technol Assess 1998;2: 1276.
  • 28
    Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol Rev 1987;9: 130.
  • 29
    Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough. Lancet 1998;351: 123127.
  • 30
    Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315: 629634.
  • 31
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151: 333337.
  • 32
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150: 535540.
  • 33
    Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142: 4754.
  • 34
    Rose BI, McCallum WD. A simplified method for estimating fetal weight using ultrasound measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69: 671675.
  • 35
    Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984;152: 497501.
  • 36
    Birnholz JC. An algorithmic approach to accurate ultrasonic fetal weight estimation. Invest Radiol 1986;21: 571576.
  • 37
    Chauhan SP, Cowan BD, Magann EF, et al. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;35: 266270.
  • 38
    Chauhan SP, Lutton PM, Bailey KJ, Guerrieri JP, Morrison JC. Intrapartum clinical, sonographic, and parous patients' estimates of newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79: 956958.
  • 39
    Hansmann M. Ultraschalbiomitrie im II and III. Trimester der Schwargerschaft. Gynaecologia 1976;9: 133155.
  • 40
    Hsieh FJ, Chang FM, Huang HC, Lu CC, Ko TM, Chen HY. Computer-assisted analysis for prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound-comparison of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi 1987;86: 957964.
  • 41
    Rossavik IK. Patterns and principles of fetal growth [thesis]. University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 1982.
  • 42
    Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Dooley SL, Vaisrub N, Socol ML, Depp R. Real-time ultrasound estimations of weight in fetuses of diabetic gravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153: 5760.
  • 43
    Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, Bors-Koefoed R, Nochimson DJ. Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157: 410414.
  • 44
    Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128: 881892.