SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod 2005;20:11447.
  • 2
    Wiegerinck MA, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Heineman MJ. How concordant are the estimated rates of natural conception and in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer success? Hum Reprod 1999;14:68993.
  • 3
    Eimers JM, Te Velde ER, Gerritse R, Vogelzang ET, Looman CW, Habbema JDF. The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples. Fertil Steril 1994;61:4452.
  • 4
    Wichmann L, Isola J, Tuohimaa P. Prognostic variables in predicting pregnancy. A prospective follow up study of 907 couples with an infertility problem. Hum Reprod 1994;9:11028.
  • 5
    Collins JA, Burrows EA, Wilan AR. The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1995;64:228.
  • 6
    Snick HK, Snick TS, Evers JL, Collins JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997;12:15828.
  • 7
    Hunault CC, Habbema JDF, Eijkemans MJC, Collins JA, Evers JL, Te Velde ER. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod 2004;19:201926.
  • 8
    Steures P, Van Der Steeg JW, Mol BWJ, Eijkemans MJC, Van der Veen F, Habbema JDF, et al. Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2004;82:4551.
  • 9
    Haan G, Bernardus RE, Hollanders JM, Leerentveld RA, Prak FM, Naaktgeboren N. Results of IVF from a prospective multicentre study. Hum Reprod 1991;6:80510.
  • 10
    Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet 1996;348:14026.
  • 11
    Stolwijk AM, Zielhuis GA, Hamilton CJ, Straatman H, Hollanders JM, Goverde HJ, et al. Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2298303.
  • 12
    Stolwijk AM, Straatman H, Zielhuis GA, Jansen CA, Braat DD, Van Dop PA, et al. External validation of prognostic models for ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:35429.
  • 13
    Hunault CC, Eijkemans MJC, Te Velde ER, Collins JA, Habbema JDF. Validation of a model predicting spontaneous pregnancy among subfertile untreated couples. Fertil Steril 2002;78:5006.
  • 14
    Hunault CC, Laven JS, Van Rooij IA, Eijkemans MJC, Te Velde ER, Habbema JDF. Prospective validation of two models predicting pregnancy leading to live birth among untreated subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 2005;20:163641.
  • 15
    Addelman S. Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial plans. Technometrics 1962;4:4758.
  • 16
    Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley, 1981.
  • 17
    Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:46.
  • 18
    Te Velde ER, Cohlen BJ. The management of infertility. N Engl J Med 1999;340:2246.
  • 19
    Van Der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJC, Habbema JDF, Bossuyt PMM, Hompes PGA, et al. Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in subfertility? Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:47380.
  • 20
    Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002;347:6616.
  • 21
    Eimers JM, Te Velde ER, Gerritse R, Van Kooy RJ, Kremer J, Habbema JDF. The validity of the postcoital test for estimating the probability of conceiving. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:6570.
  • 22
    Oei SG, Helmerhorst FM, Bloemenkamp KW, Hollants FA, Meerpoel DE, Keirse MJ. Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1998;317:5025.