SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, Baker P, Bradley J, Cooper C, et al . The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ 2005;330:57680.
  • 2
    Spurgeon P, Hicks C, Barwell F. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care. Midwifery 2001;17:12332.
  • 3
    Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Waldenstrom U. Number of antenatal visits and women’s opinion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:24854.
  • 4
    Clement S, Sikorski J, Wilson J, Das S, Smeeton N. Women’s satisfaction with traditional and reduced antenatal visit schedules. Midwifery 1996;12:1208.
  • 5
    Jewell D, Sharp D, Sanders J, Peters TJ. A randomised controlled trial of flexibility in routine antenatal care. BJOG 2000;107:12417.
  • 6
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.
  • 7
    Scott S, Prior L, Wood F, Gray J. Repositioning the patient: the implications of being ‘at risk’ Soc Sci Med 2005;6:8691879.
  • 8
    Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C, Sachs L. Women’s experiences of cervical cellular changes: an unintentional transition from health to liminality? Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:30625.
  • 9
    Stahl A, Hundley V. Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy—so we scare because we care? Midwifery 2003;19:298309.
  • 10
    Schutz A. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • 11
    Department of Health. Changing Childbirth, Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993.