1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)
You have free access to this content
Open or laparoscopic colposuspension for stress incontinence: new evidence too late?
Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01049.x
Issue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 113, Issue 9, pages 985–987, September 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Tincello, D. (2006), Open or laparoscopic colposuspension for stress incontinence: new evidence too late?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113: 985–987. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01049.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006
- Accepted 10 July 2006.
References
- 1, , . Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD002912 [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912].
- 2, , , . Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;CD002239 [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002239].
- 3, , , , , , et al. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006;113:999–1006.
- 4, , , , , , et al. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension—results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006;113:1007–1013.
- 5, . Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 2002;325:67–70.
- 6, , , , , . Cost-effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2006;113:1014–1022.
- 7, , . A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:345–50.
- 8, , , . A cost-utility analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence. BJOG 2003;110:255–62.
- 9; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;190:324–31.
- 10, , , . Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1249–58.
- 11, , , . Cost-analyses based on a prospective, randomised study comparing laparoscopic colposuspension with tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:1066–73.
- 12, , , . Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic Burch urethropexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:386–9.
- 13, , , , , . Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:42–9.
- 14, . Good practice guidelines for urogynaecological and female pelvic reconstructive surgery with particular reference to the introduction of new procedures. 2006 [www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/practice_guidelines_june06.pdf]. Accessed 21 June 2006.