• 1
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
  • 2
    Government Statistical Services for the Department of Health. NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 2003–2004. Accessed 3 October 2006.
  • 3
    Department of Health. Changing Childbirth: Part I: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993.
  • 4
    National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Caesarean Section: Clinical Guideline 13. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence, 2004.
  • 5
    Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise J-M. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: A review of evidence. Birth 2004;31:4960.
  • 6
    Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M, Kurinczuk JJ, Oppenheimer C, Squire P, Waugh J. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians’ and midwives accounts. BJOG 2005;112:17.
  • 7
    York S, Briscoe L, Walkinshaw S, Lavender T. Why women choose to have a repeat caesarean section. Br J Midwifery 2005;13:4405.
  • 8
    Montgomery AA, the DiAMOND Study Group. The DiAMOND trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with a previous caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004;4:25. Accessed 3 October 2006.
  • 9
    Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: BrymanA, BurgessRG, editors. Analyzing Qualitative Data. Oxford, UK: Routledge; 1994. pp. 17394.
  • 10
    Janesick V. The dance of qualitative research design: metaphor, methodolatory and meaning. In: DenzinN, LincolnY, editors. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994. pp. 20919.
  • 11
    Sur S, MacKenzie IZ. Does discussion of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:33841.
  • 12
    Murphy DJ, Pope C, Frost J, Liebling RE. Women’s views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study. Br Med J 2003;327:11326.
  • 13
    Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of maternal views on future mode of delivery following operative delivery in the second stage of labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:5428.
  • 14
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997;44:68192.
  • 15
    Buetow S. To care is to coprovide. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:5535.
  • 16
    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:65161.
  • 17
    Dowie J. The role of patients’ meta-preferences in the design and evaluation of decision support systems. Health Expect 2002;5:1627.
  • 18
    McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335:68995.
  • 19
    Mozurkewich EL, Hutton K. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:118797.