The study was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology in Istanbul, Turkey, September 2005.
Feasibility of screening for ovarian cancer using symptoms as selection criteria*
Article first published online: 6 DEC 2006
RCOG 2007 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 114, Issue 1, pages 59–64, January 2007
How to Cite
Rufford, B., Jacobs, I. and Menon, U. (2007), Feasibility of screening for ovarian cancer using symptoms as selection criteria. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114: 59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01153.x
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 2006
- Article first published online: 6 DEC 2006
- Accepted 3 October 2006.
- ovarian cancer;
Objective Retrospective studies have reported that 95% of women with ovarian cancer have symptoms prior to diagnosis and that women with these symptoms are at an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Failure to recognise these symptoms may result in a delay in referral and diagnosis. We assess the feasibility of screening for ovarian cancer using symptoms as selection criteria.
Design A randomised controlled trial.
Setting General practices in East London.
Population Three hundred and ninety GPs.
Methods GPs were randomised by practice, and those in the study group were given rapid access to ultrasound and CA125 test for women, >45 years, suffering from symptoms that may be caused by ovarian cancer.
Main outcome measures Symptoms leading to referral, ultrasound and CA125 results and ovarian cancer diagnosis.
Results Seventy nine practices containing 197 GPs were randomised to the study arm. Three hundred and seventeen women were referred, of which 315 were eligible. Women reported the following symptoms: abdominal 87%, gastrointestinal 41% and constitutional 29%. Twenty-three women had abnormal findings on ultrasound: 20 were managed conservatively and 3 surgically. Histology revealed a mucinous cystadenoma, a Brenner tumour and a serous cystadenoma. Incidental findings included endometrial pathology in 13 women and bladder pathology in 2. Ninety five percent of CA125 results were <35 units/ml.
Conclusions This pilot study confirms the feasibility of screening for ovarian cancer using symptoms as selection criteria. Specificity was high and patient compliance good. Initial concerns about referral volumes and additional investigations and referrals generated were not confirmed. No ovarian cancers were detected in this pilot study, and this may be due to the size of the cohort.