• 1
    Wilkinson C, McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:4552.
  • 2
    Arias E, MacDorman MF, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics—2002 [see comment]. Pediatrics 2003;112:121530.
  • 3
    Marieskind H. An Evaluation of Cesarean Section in the United States. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979.
  • 4
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Cesarean Childbirth. Report No. 82-2067. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1981.
  • 5
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s health. Caesarean Section: Clinical Guidelines. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology, 2004.
  • 6
    Belizan JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ 1999;319:1397400.
  • 7
    Merchant KM, Villar J, Kestler E. Maternal height and newborn size relative to risk of intrapartum caesarean delivery and perinatal distress. BJOG 2001;108:68996.
  • 8
    Kirby RS. Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down? Birth 2004;31:14851.
  • 9
    Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor [update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000063; PMID: 10796109]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;CD000063.
  • 10
    Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Obstetricians’ personal choice and mode of delivery [see comment]. Lancet 1996;347:544.
  • 11
    Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ 2000;321:15015.
  • 12
    Turcotte L, Robst J, Polachek S. Medicaid coverage and medical interventions during pregnancy. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2005;5:25571.
  • 13
    Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S. Indications for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001;15:115.
  • 14
    Victora CG, Barros FC. Beware: unnecessary caesarean sections may be hazardous [comment]. Lancet 2006;367:17967.
  • 15
    Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Why Mothers Die 2000-2002: The Sixth Report of Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press, 2004.
  • 16
    Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Why Mothers Die 1997-1999: The Fifth Report of Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
  • 17
    Li T, Rhoads GG, Smulian J, Demissie K, Wartenberg D, Kruse L. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:120412.
  • 18
    Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America [see comment]. Lancet 2006;367:181929.
  • 19
    Anderson GM, Lomas J. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. N Engl J Med 1984;311:88792.
  • 20
    Sakala C. Medically unnecessary cesarean section births: introduction to a symposium. Soc Sci Med 1993;37:117798.
  • 21
    McIlwaine G, Boulton-Jones C, Cole S, Wilkinson C. Caesarean Section in Scotland 1994/5: A National Audit. Edinburgh: Scottish Programme for Clinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health, 1995.
  • 22
    Notzon FC, Placek PJ, Taffel SM. Comparisons of national cesarean section rates. N Engl J Med 1987;316:3869.
  • 23
    Biringer A, Davies B, Nimrod C, Sternberg C, Youens W. Attaining and Maintaining Best Practices in the Use of Caesarean Sections. An Analysis of Four Ontario Hospitals. Ottawa, Canada: Caesarean Section Working Group of the Ontario Women’s Health Council, 2000.
  • 24
    Stanley FJ, Croft ML, Gibbins J, Read AW. A population database for maternal and child health research in Western Australia using record linkage. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1994;8:43347.
  • 25
    Blair E, Liu Y, Cosgrove P. Choosing the best estimate of gestational age from routinely collected population-based perinatal data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004;18:2706.
  • 26
    Roberts CL, Algert CS, Douglas I, Tracy SK, Peat B. Trends in labour and birth interventions among low-risk women in New South Wales. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:17681.
  • 27
    Meikle SF, Steiner CA, Zhang J, Lawrence WL. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:7516.
  • 28
    Odlind V, Haglund B, Pakkanen M, Otterblad Olausson P. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973-2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register [see comment]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:51628.
  • 29
    MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Malloy MH. Trends and characteristics of induced labour in the United States, 1989-98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:26373.
  • 30
    Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:8837.
  • 31
    Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:28793.
  • 32
    Rosenthal AN, Paterson-Brown S. Is there an incremental rise in the risk of obstetric intervention with increasing maternal age? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:10649.
  • 33
    Patel R, Peters T, Murphy D, ALSPAC. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:35367.
  • 34
    Cnattingius R, Hoglund B, Kieler H. Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:45662.
  • 35
    Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, 2001.
  • 36
    Minkoff H, Powderly KR, Chervenak F, McCullough LB. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery [see comment]. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:38792.
  • 37
    MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B. Indications for caesarean section in a consultant obstetric unit over three decades. J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;23:2338.
  • 38
    Lavender T, Kingdon C, Hart A, Gyte G, Gabbay M, Neilson JP. Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery [see comment]. BMJ 2005;331:4901.
  • 39
    Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;CD004224.
  • 40
    Rowe RE, Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. J Public Health Med 2003;25:11319.
  • 41
    Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions [see comment]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:62833.
  • 42
    Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:6007.
  • 43
    RCOG. Induction of Labour. Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Number 9. London: Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2001.
  • 44
    ACOG. Induction of Labor: ACOG Practice Bulletin; No. 10. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 1999 []. Accessed 4 August 2006 and 22 March 2007.
  • 45
    Hall LF, Neubert AG. Obesity and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60:25360.
  • 46
    Read AW, Prendiville WJ, Dawes VP, Stanley FJ. Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia. Am J Public Health 1994;84:3742.
  • 47
    Di Cianni G, Volpe L, Lencioni C, Miccoli R, Cuccuru I, Ghio A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for gestational diabetes assessed by universal screening. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003;62:1317.
  • 48
    Glazer NL, Hendrickson AF, Schellenbaum GD, Mueller BA. Weight change and the risk of gestational diabetes in obese women. Epidemiology 2004;15:7337.