• 1
    Martin PM, Welch HG. Probabilities for singleton and multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998;70:47881.
  • 2
    Anderson AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, De Mouzon J, Nygren KG. The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2006;21:168097.
  • 3
    Blondel B, Kaminsky M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:23949.
  • 4
    Ledger WL, Anumba D, Marlow N, Thomas CM, Wilson EC; Cost of Multiple Births Study Group (COMBS Group). The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. BJOG 2006;113:215.
  • 5
    Pandian Z, Templeton A, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2005;20:26817.
  • 6
    Gerris JM. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2005;11:10521.
  • 7
    Braude P. One Child at a Time: Reducing Multiple Births after IVF. Report of the Expert Group on Multiple Births After IVF. HFEA, 2006 []. Accessed 15 November 2006.
  • 8
    Murray S, Shetty A, Rattray A, Taylor V, Bhattacharya S. A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004;19:91116.
  • 9
    Porter M, Bhattacharya S. Investigations of staff and patients’ opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2005;20:252330.
  • 10
    Gleicher N, Barad D. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2006;21:133744.
  • 11
    Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Andersen AN. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2003;18:6217.
  • 12
    Leiblum SR, Kemmann E, Taska L. Attitudes toward multiple births and pregnancy concerns in infertile and non-infertile women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1990;11:197210.
  • 13
    Hartshorne GM, Lilford RJ. Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2002;17:102330.
  • 14
    Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 15
    Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, Barr R, Horsman J. Guide to Design and Development of Health-State Utility Instrumentation. CHEPA Working Paper; 90. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University, 1990.
  • 16
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:9238.
  • 17
    Ryan GL, Zhang SH, Dokras A, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil Steril 2004;81:5004.
  • 18
    Gleicher N, Cambell DP, Chan CL, Karande V, Rao R, Balin M, et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum Reprod 1995;10:107984.
  • 19
    ESHRE Campus Report. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2001;16:790800.
  • 20
    Pham CT, Crowther CA. Birth outcomes: utility values that postnatal women, midwives and medical staff express. BJOG 2003;110:1217.
  • 21
    Vandenbussche FP, De Jong-Potjer LC, Stiggelbout AM, Le Cessie S, Keirse MJ. Differences in the valuation of birth outcomes among pregnant women, mothers, and obstetricians. Birth 1999;26:17883.
  • 22
    Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D, Furlong W, Burrows E, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents and adolescents. JAMA 1999;281:19917.
  • 23
    Kuppermann M, Shiboski S, Feeny D, Elkin EP, Washington AE. Can preference scores for discrete states be used to derive preference scores for an entire path of events? An application to prenatal diagnosis. Med Decis Making 1997;17:4255.
  • 24
    Scotland GS, McNamee P, Bhattacharya S. Is elective single embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative to double embryo transfer? BJOG 2007;114:57.
  • 25
    Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004;19:37.
  • 26
    Heijnen EMEW, Eijkemans MJC, De Klerk C, Polinder S, Beckers NGM, Klinkert ER, et al. A randomised trial comparing a standard vs. a mild treatment strategy, considering term live birth, cost and discomfort during 1 year treatment. Hum Reprod 2006;21 (Suppl 1):Abstract O–207.
  • 27
    Newton CR, McBride J, Feyles V, Tekpetey F, Power S. Factors affecting patients’ attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2007;87:26978.
  • 28
    Blennborn M, Nilsson S, Hillervik C, Hellberg D. The couple’s decision making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? Hum Reprod 2005;20:12927.