Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing NovaSure and ThermaChoice endometrial ablation
Article first published online: 6 JUL 2007
RCOG 2007 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Special Issue: Health of women and babies: long-term and intergenerational perspectives
Volume 115, Issue 2, pages 193–198, January 2008
How to Cite
Kleijn, J., Engels, R., Bourdrez, P., Mol, B. and Bongers, M. (2008), Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing NovaSure and ThermaChoice endometrial ablation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 115: 193–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01427.x
- Issue published online: 7 DEC 2007
- Article first published online: 6 JUL 2007
- Accepted 15 May 2007. Published OnlineEarly 6 July 2007.
- long follow-up;
- second generation ablation technique
Objective We have previously reported that NovaSure® was more effective than balloon ablation at 12 months follow up in the treatment of menorrhagia. In this paper, we report the 5-year outcome of this study. The objective was to evaluate amenorrhoea rates, hysterectomy rate, and quality of life associated with the bipolar impedance-controlled endometrial ablation technique (NovaSure) in comparison with balloon ablation technique (ThermaChoice®) at 5 years after administration.
Design Double-blind randomised controlled trial, 2:1 randomisation NovaSure versus ThermaChoice.
Setting A teaching hospital with 500 beds in the Netherlands.
Population A total of 126 premenopausal women suffering from menorrhagia with a pictorial blood loss assessment count ≥150 without intracavitary abnormalities.
Methods Women were randomly allocated to bipolar radio-frequency ablation and balloon ablation in a 2:1 ratio.
Main outcome measures The main outcome measures were amenorrhoea rate, hysterectomies, and health-related quality of life (HRQol) as reported at 5 year follow up.
Results At 5 years of follow up, the total response rate was 96% in the bipolar group and 90% in the balloon group. Amenorrhoea was reported in the bipolar group by 48% of women and in the balloon arm by 32% (relative risk 1.6 [.93–2.6]). There were eight women in the bipolar group (9.8%) and five in the balloon group (12.9%) who had undergone a hysterectomy. Furthermore, there was a significant equal improvement of HRQoL over time in both groups.
Conclusions At 5 years follow up, bipolar thermal ablation was superior over balloon ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia.