SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Anthony S, Amelink-Verburg MP, Jacobusse GW, Van Der Pal-de Bruin KM. De thuisbevalling in Nederland 1995-2002. Leiden, the Netherlands: St Perinatale Registratie Nederland en TNO Kwaliteit van Leven, 2005.
  • 2
    Coffie DSV, Wiegers TA, Schellevis FG. Verloskunde uit de eerste lijn. Verschuiving in taakopvatting van huisartsen. Medisch Contact 2003;58:8034.
  • 3
    Wiegers TA. Steeds minder huisartsen verloskundig actief. Huisarts en wetenschap 2003;46:4324.
  • 4
    Commissie Verloskunde van het CVZ. Verloskundig Vademecum 2003. Diemen, the Netherlands: College voor Zorgverzekeringen, 2003.
  • 5
    Obstetric Manual. Final Report of the Obstetric Working Group of the National Health Insurance Board of The Netherlands (abridged version). 1999 [www.europe.obgyn.net/nederland/default.asp?page=nederland/richtlijnen/vademecum_eng].
  • 6
    Bais JMJ. Obstetric outcome in nulliparous and multiparous women with singleton pregnancies, according to risk selection. Risk selection and detection. A critical appraisal of the Dutch obstetric system. Thesis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Academisch Medisch Centrum, 2004, pp 59112.
  • 7
    Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, Van Der Zee J, Berghs GAH. Outcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands. BMJ 1996;313:130913.
  • 8
    Treffers PE. Selection as the basis of obstetric care in the Netherlands. In: Abraham-van der MarkE, editor. Successful Home Birth and Midwifery; The Dutch Model. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Het Spinhuis Publishers; 1996:97113.
  • 9
    Buitendijk SE. How safe are Dutch home births? In: Abraham-van der MarkE, editor. Successful Home Birth and Midwifery. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Het Spinhuis; 1996, pp 11528.
  • 10
    Eskes M, Van Alten D, Treffers PE. The Wormerveer study; perinatal mortality and non-optimal management in a practice of independent midwives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;51:915.
  • 11
    Eskes M. Het Wormerveer onderzoek. Meerjarenonderzoek naar de kwaliteit van de verloskundige zorg rond een vroedvrouwenpraktijk. Thesis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1989.
  • 12
    Berghs GAH, Spanjaards EWM. De normale zwangerschap: bevalling en beleid. Thesis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 1988.
  • 13
    Nijhuis JG. De foetus verdient meer. Inaugurele rede. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Universitair Medisch Centrum Maastricht, 2000.
  • 14
    Merkus JMWM. Het einde van de thuisbevalling. Afscheidsrede. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Universitair Medisch Centrum Nijmegen, 2000.
  • 15
    Reuwer PJHM, Bruinse HW. Preventive Support of Labour. Een uitdaging voor verloskundigen, gynaecologen en beleidsmakers. Alphen aan de Rijn, the Netherlands: Van Zuiden Communications BV, 2002.
  • 16
    Lems AA, Borkent-Polet M, Van Hemel OJS, Verwey RA, De Boer MG, Buitendijk SE, et al. Obstetrics in The Netherlands, Trends 1989-1993. Utrecht, the Netherlands: SIG Zorginformatie, 1996.
  • 17
    Borkent-Polet M, Van Der Schoot F, Swenne-van Ingen MME, School M, Linden HHW. Obstetrics in The Netherlands, Trends 1995-1999. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, 2005.
  • 18
    Davies J, Hey E, Reid W, Young G. Prospective regional study of planned home births. Home Birth Study Steering Group. BMJ 1996;313:13026.
  • 19
    Ackermann-Liebrich U, Voegeli T, Gunter-Witt K, Kunz I, Zullig M, Schindler C et al. Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team. BMJ 1996;313:131318.
  • 20
    Olsen O, Jewell MD. Home versus hospital birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;CD000352.
  • 21
    Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson DF, Peacock D et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ 2002;166:31523.
  • 22
    Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005;330:1416.
  • 23
    Hildingsson I, Waldenstrom U, Radestad I. Swedish women’s interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care. Birth 2003;30:1122.
  • 24
    Pang JW, Heffelfinger JD, Huang GJ, Benedetti TJ, Weiss NS. Outcomes of planned home births in Washington State: 1989-1996. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:2539.
  • 25
    Waldenstrom U, Nilsson CA, Winbladh B. The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:4108.
  • 26
    Reddy K, Reginald PW, Spring JE, Nunn L, Mishra N. A free-standing low-risk maternity unit in the United Kingdom: does it have a role? J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:3606.
  • 27
    Morano S, Cerutti F, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Benussi M, Costantini S et al. Outcomes of the first midwife-led birth centre in Italy: 5 years’ experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:3337.
  • 28
    Stewart M, McCandlish R, Henderson J, Brocklehurst P. Review of Evidence About Clinical, Psychosocial and Economic Outcomes for Women with Straightforward Pregnancies Who Plan to Give Birth in an Midwife-led Birth Centre, and Outcomes for Their Babies. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford, 2005.
  • 29
    Hodnett ED, Downe S, Edwards N, Walsh D. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;CD000012.
  • 30
    Kateman H, Herschderfer K. Multidisciplinary Collaborative Primary Maternity Care Project. Current Practice in Europe and Australia. Den Haag, the Netherlands: International Confederation of Midwives, 2005.
  • 31
    The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Perinatal Care in The Netherlands 2001. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, 2005.
  • 32
    Pel M, Heres MHB. OBINT. A study of obstetric intervention. Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1995.
  • 33
    The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Perinatal Care in The Netherlands 2002. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, 2005.
  • 34
    The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Perinatal Care in The Netherlands 2003. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: the Netherlands Perinatal Registry, 2006.
  • 35
    Anthony S, Van Der Pal-de Bruin KM, Graafmans WC, Dorrepaal CA, Borkent-Polet M, Van Hemel OJS, et al. The reliability of perinatal and neonatal mortality rates: differential under-reporting in linked professional registers vs Dutch civil registers. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:30614.
  • 36
    Anthony S. The Dutch Perinatal and Neonatal Registers: applications in perinatal epidemiology. Thesis, Leiden, the Netherlands: Universiteit, Leiden, 2005.
  • 37
    Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Use and abuse of the Apgar score. Pediatrics 1996;98:1412.
  • 38
    ACOG Committee Opinion #303. Inappropiate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:903.
  • 39
    Leeman LD, Waelput AJM, Eskes M, Achterberg PW. Op weg naar de landelijke invoering van perinatale audit. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: RIVM, 2007.
  • 40
    Van Der Hulst LAM, Van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Bleker OP. Does a pregnant woman’s intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions? Birth 2004;31:2833.
  • 41
    Damstra-Wijmenga SMI. Veilig bevallen. Een vergelijkende studie tusasen de thuisbevalling en de klinische bevalling. Groningen, the Netherlands: Universiteit van Groningen, 1982.
  • 42
    Kleiverda G, Steen AM, Andersen I, Treffers PE, Everaerd W. Place of delivery in The Netherlands: actual location of confinement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;39:13946.
  • 43
    Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. Nota Normpraktijk Gynaecologie 2000. Utrecht, the Netherlands: NVOG, 2000.
  • 44
    KNMG. Voorstel voor normstelling aanrijtijd hulpverleners bij het verlenen van noodzakelijke medische hulp. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Koninklijke Nederlandse Maatschappij tot bevordering van de Geneeskunst, 2004.
  • 45
    Chardon AJ, Wildschut HI, Stolwijk AJ, Deckers CM, Relyveld RM, Van Der Meulen JH. Duur van ambulancevervoer van verloskundige patiënten. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1994;138:20537.
  • 46
    Nijhuis JG. Epiduraal analgesie tijdens de bevalling. Bepaald geen luxe. Medisch Contact 2005;60:6113.
  • 47
    Groenen C, Van Der Stouwe R. Reanimatie van de pasgeborenen in de thuissituatie of vergelijkbare omstandigheden (KNOV-standpunt). Bilthoven, Utrecht, the Netherlands: Koninklijke Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskundigen, 2005.
  • 48
    NVK Werkgroep. ‘Ontwikkeling evidence based Nederlandse richtlijn reanimatie van pasgeborenen’. Richtlijn reanimatie van pasgeborenen. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde, 2004.
  • 49
    Kleiverda G, Steen AM, Andersen I, Treffers PE, Everaerd W. Confinement in nulliparous women in the Netherlands: subjective experiences related to actual events and post-partum well-being. Transition to parenthood. Thesis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 89116.
  • 50
    Wiegers TA, Van Der Zee J, Keirse MJ. Transfer from home to hospital: what is its effect on the experience of childbirth? Birth 1998;25:1924.
  • 51
    Richardus JH, Graafmans WC, Bergsjo P, Lloyd DJ, Bakketeig LS, Bannon EM et al. Suboptimal care and perinatal mortality in ten European regions: methodology and evaluation of an international audit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;14:26776.
  • 52
    Richardus JH, Graafmans WC, Van Der Pal-de Bruin KM, Amelink-Verburg MP, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Mackenbach JP. An European concerted action investigating the validity of perinatal mortality as an outcome indicator for the quality of antenatal and perinatal care. J Perinat Med 1997;25:31324.
  • 53
    Amelink-Verburg MP, Van Roosmalen J, Roelofsen JM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Evaluatie en validatie van perinatale-sterfte-audit door terugkoppeling naar zorgverleners [Evaluation and validation of a perinatal death audit by means of feedback to the caregivers]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2003;147:23337.