• 1
    Nyboe Andersen A, Erb K. Register data on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark. Int J Androl 2006;29:1216.
  • 2
    Simmons R, Doyle P, Maconochie N. Dramatic reduction in triplet and higher order births in England and Wales. BJOG 2004;111:8568.
  • 3
    Braude P. One child at a time: reducing multiple births after IVF. Report of the Expert Group on Multiple Births after IVF. London, UK: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2006.
  • 4
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. Clinical guideline No. 11. London: NICE, 2004.
  • 5
    Kennedy R, Kingsland C, Rutherford A, Hamilton M, Ledger W. Implementation of the NICE Guideline—Recommendations from the British Fertility Society for National Criteria for NHS Funding of Assisted Conception. Bristol, UK: British Fertility Society, 2006.
  • 6
    Henderson J, Hockley C, Petrou S, Goldacre M, Davidson L. Economic implications of multiple births: inpatient hospital costs in the first 5 years of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F5425.
  • 7
    Ledger WL, Anumba D, Marlow N, Thomas CM, Wilson EC.; Cost of Multiple Births Study Group (COMBS Group). The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. BJOG 2006;113:215.
  • 8
    Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 2006;21:21016.
  • 9
    Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Hum Reprod 1998;13:8894.
  • 10
    Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Vander Elst J, Mangelschots K, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2004;19:91723.
  • 11
    De Sutter P, Gerris J, Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2002;17:28916.
  • 12
    Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM, Zielhuis GA, Adang EM, Scheenjes E, et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2005;20:7028.
  • 13
    Fiddelers AA, Van Montfoort AP, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Dunselman GA, et al. Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:20907.
  • 14
    Department of Health. Health Secretary welcomes new fertility guidance. Press Release 2004/0069, 2004.]. Accessed 11 December 2006.
  • 15
    Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomas C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2001;16:19003.
  • 16
    Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2392402.
  • 17
    Matorras R, Matorras F, Mendoza R, Rodríguez M, Remohí J, Rodríguez-Escudero FJ, et al. The implantation of every embryo facilitates the chances of the remaining embryos to implant in an IVF programme: a mathematical model to predict pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 2005;20:292331.
  • 18
    Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, Keirse MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004;328:261.
  • 19
    Petterson B, Nelson KB, Watson L, Stanley F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993;307:123943.
  • 20
    Department of Health. NHS Reference Costs. 2004. []. Accessed 13 March 2006.
  • 21
    The Information Centre. Hospital episode statistics. 2004. []. Accessed 13 March 2006.
  • 22
    Curtis L, Netten A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2005. Canterbury, UK: Personal and Social Services Research Unit, 2005.
  • 23
    Her Majesty’s Treasury. The Green Book. Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: The Stationery Office, 2003.
  • 24
    Fenwick E, Byford S. A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:1068.
  • 25
    Scotland GS, McNamee P, Bhattacharya S. Is elective single embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative to double embryo transfer? BJOG 2007;114:57.
  • 26
    Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Evers JL. Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;13:513.
  • 27
    Little SE, Ratcliffe J, Caughey AB. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:593601.
  • 28
    Stevenson RC, Pharoah P, Stevenson CJ, McCabe CJ, Cooke RWI. Cost of care for a geographically determined population of low birthweight infants to age 8-9 years. II. Children with disability. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;74:F11821.
  • 29
    Weaver SM, Clifford E, Hay DM, Robinson J. Psychosocial adjustment to unsuccessful IVF and GIFT treatment. Patient Educ Couns 1997;31:718.
  • 30
    Klock SC. Psychosocial adjustment to twins after infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:64556.
  • 31
    Croucher C, Lass A, Margara R, Winston RM. Predictive value of the results of a first in-vitro fertilization cycle on the outcome of subsequent cycles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:4038.