SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Quinn MJ, Babb PJ, Jones J, Baker A, Ault C. Cancer 1971-1997. Registrations of Cancer Cases and Deaths in England and Wales by Sex, Age, Year, Health Region and Type of Cancer (CD-ROM). London: Office for National Statistics, 1999.
  • 2
    Bray F, Carstensen B, Moller H, Zappa M, Zakelj MP, Lawrence G, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:21929.
  • 3
    Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, et al. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:67786.
  • 4
    Cancer of the cervix: death by incompetence (editorial). Lancet 1985;2:3634.
  • 5
    Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different age groups: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003;89:8893.
  • 6
    NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Audit of Invasive Cervical Cancers. NHSCSP Publication no. 28. Sheffield: 2006.
  • 7
    Herbert A, Breen C, Bryant TN, Hitchcock A, Macdonald H, Millward-Sadler GH, et al. Invasive cervical cancer in Southampton and South West Hampshire: effect of introducing a comprehensive cervical screening programme. J Med Screen 1996;3:238.
  • 8
    Herbert A, Singh N, Smith JAE. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix compared with squamous cell carcinoma: a 12-year study in Southampton and South-West Hampshire. Cytopathology 2001;12:2636.
  • 9
    Sigurdsson K, Hrafnkelsson J, Geirsson G, Gudmundsson J, Salarsdottir A. Screening as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors based on Icelandic population data 1964-1988. Gynecol Obstet 1991;43:6470.
  • 10
    Pretorius R, Semrad N, Watring W, Fotheringham N. Presentation of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1991;42:4853.
  • 11
    Wessex Regional Health Authority. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Mid Year Population Estimates 1985–1996.
  • 12
    Herbert A, Anshu, Gregory M, Gupta SS, Singh N. Invasive cervical cancer audit: a relative increase in interval cancers while coverage increased and incidence declined. BJOG 2009;116:845853.
  • 13
    Department of Health. Summary data from Form KC53 (Adult Screening Programme). Cervical cytology—1992-93: part one.
  • 14
    Herbert A, Stein K, Bryant TN, Breen C, Old P. Relation between the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and the screening interval: is a five year interval too long? J Med Screen 1996;3:1405.
  • 15
    Herbert A, Bryant TN, Campbell MJ, Smith J. Investigation of the effect of occult invasive cancer on the progress towards successful cervical screening. J Med Screen 1998;5:928.
  • 16
    deSouza NM, Soutter WP, McIndoe GA, Gilderdale DJ, Krausz T. Stage 1 cervical cancer: tumour volume by magnetic resonance imaging of screen-detected versus symptomatic lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:131415.
  • 17
    Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83 (Suppl 1):4178.
  • 18
    Herbert A, Holdsworth G, Kubba AA. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:215.