SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Kara D. Sizing and Seizing the Robotic Opportunity. Robonexus. 2005. [www.robonexus.com/roboticsmarket.htm]. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  • 2
    Fisher SS, McGreevy MM, Humphries J. Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on Interactive 3-Dimensional Graphics. 1987;112. ISBN 0897912284.
  • 3
    Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988;35:15360.
  • 4
    Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Ng WS, Timoney AG, Wickham JE. The development of a surgeon robot for prostatectomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1991;205:358.
  • 5
    Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, Musits B, Taylor RH, Kazanzides P, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;285:5766.
  • 6
    Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP)z in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 1998;13:274850.
  • 7
    Sackier JM, Wang Y. Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc 1994;8:636.
  • 8
    Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Surg Endosc 2000;14:37581.
  • 9
    Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:126770.
  • 10
    Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Detter C, Arnold M, Gulbins H, Meiser B, et al. Clinical use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:198202.
  • 11
    Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy–critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 2006;49:61224.
  • 12
    Morino M, Benincà G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2004;18:17426.
  • 13
    Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, et al. Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 2006;20:11924.
  • 14
    Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 2008;53:51421.
  • 15
    Klingler DW, Hemstreet G, Balaji KC. Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy–initial results of single-institution pilot study. Urology 2005;65:10869.
  • 16
    Horgan S, Benedetti E, Moser F. Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 2004;188:45S51S.
  • 17
    Thaly R, Shah K, Patel VR. Applications of robots in urology. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:317.
  • 18
    Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2001;87:40810.
  • 19
    Borin JF, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;70:1737.
  • 20
    Joseph JV, Rosenbaum R, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 2006;175:94550.
  • 21
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51:64857.
  • 22
    Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99:110912.
  • 23
    Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007;51:75562.
  • 24
    Box GN, Ahlering TE. Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:1739.
  • 25
    Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007;51:4555.
  • 26
    Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, et al. Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 2007;25:14960.
  • 27
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J; The VIP Team. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169:228992.
  • 28
    Tewari A, Menon M. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results. Curr Urol Rep 2003;4:11923.
  • 29
    Goldstraw MA, Patil K, Anderson C, Dasgupta P, Kirby RS. A selected review and personal experience with robotic prostatectomy: implications for adoption of this new technology in the United Kingdom. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007;10:2429.
  • 30
    Capello SA, Boczko J, Patel HR, Joseph JV. Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21:1199202.
  • 31
    Lam TB, Singh A, Piacente PM, Narula N, Gofrit ON, Taylor RH et al. Surgical management of localized prostate cancer (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;Art. No.: CD007021:DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007021.
  • 32
    Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, El-Tabey NA, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:2326.
  • 33
    Guru KA, Kim HL, Piacente PM, Mohler JL. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology 2007;69:46974.
  • 34
    Hemal AK, Abol-Enein H, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, Ghoneim MA, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:71929.
  • 35
    Lowentritt BH, Castle EP, Woods M, Davis R, Thomas R. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy in women: technique and initial experience. J Endourol 2008;22:70912.
  • 36
    Rhee JJ, Lebeau S, Smolkin M, Theodorescu D. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int 2006;98:105963.
  • 37
    Abraham JB, Young JL, Box GN, Lee HJ, Deane LA, Ornstein DK. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Endourol 2007;21:147380.
  • 38
    Hemal AK, Kolla SB, Wadhwa P, Dogra PN, Gupta NP. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion: a single center experience of 48 cases with three years of follow-up. Urology 2008;71:416.
  • 39
    Mottrie A, Carpentier P, Schatteman P, Fonteyne E, Suttmann H, Stöckle M, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: initial experience on 27 consecutive patients. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:197201.
  • 40
    Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int 2008;101:8993.
  • 41
    Elhage O, Murphy D, Challacombe B, Rimington P, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Robotic urology in the United Kingdom: experience and overview of robotic-assisted cystectomy. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:23542.
  • 42
    Palese MA, Munver R, Phillips CK, Dinlenc C, Stifelman M, DelPizzo JJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. JSLS 2005;9:2527.
  • 43
    Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 2005;66:459.
  • 44
    Weise ES, Winfield HN. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2006;20:81319.
  • 45
    Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, Bagley DH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technical considerations and outcomes. J Endourol 2008;22:12916.
  • 46
    Palese MA, Stifelman MD, Munver R, Sosa RE, Philipps CK, Dinlenc C, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience. J Endourol 2005;19:3826.
  • 47
    Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006;243:48691.
  • 48
    Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 2008;22:16906.
  • 49
    Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1:54954.
  • 50
    Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 2007;21:17018.
  • 51
    van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Giezeman MJ, Borel Rinkes IH. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006;20:14359.
  • 52
    Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Shamoun DM, Campos JH. The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 2007;21:228592.
  • 53
    Augustin F, Schmid T, Bodner J. The robotic approach for mediastinal lesions. Int J Med Robot 2006;2:26270.
  • 54
    Cadière GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Leman G, et al. Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2001;15:91823.
  • 55
    Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RC, Simmermacher RK, Gooszen HG, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2006;93:13519.
  • 56
    Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, Garrone C, Rebecchi F. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006;93:5538.
  • 57
    Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, Bintintan VV, Köninger J, Büchler MW, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2007;21:18005.
  • 58
    Nakadi IE, Mélot C, Closset J, DeMoor V, Bétroune K, Feron P, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 2006;30:10504.
  • 59
    Wykypiel H, Bodner J, Wetscher G, Schmid T. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1407.
  • 60
    Marescaux J, Smith MK, Fölscher D, Jamali F, Malassagne B, Leroy J. Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Ann Surg 2001;234:17.
  • 61
    Nio D, Bemelman WA, Busch OR, Vrouenraets BC, Gouma DJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2004;18:37982.
  • 62
    Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, et al. Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2006;5:11518.
  • 63
    Bodner J, Hoeller E, Wykypiel H, Klingler P, Schmid T. Long-term follow-up after robotic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 2005;71:2815.
  • 64
    Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008;247:98793.
  • 65
    Langer D, Pudil J, Ryska M. [Robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Rozhl Chir 2006;85:4504.
  • 66
    Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 2006;136:1728.
  • 67
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Davidsaon BR. Robot assistant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;Art. No.: CD006578:DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006578.
  • 68
    Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, Realli M, Laborde F. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:3626.
  • 69
    Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, Smith CR, Argenziano M, Starnes VA, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1395404.
  • 70
    Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR. Outcomes in robotic cardiac surgery. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:1923.
  • 71
    Anderson CA, Kypson AP, Chitwood WR Jr. Robotic mitral surgery: current and future roles. Curr Opin Cardiol 2008;23:11720.
  • 72
    Diks J, Nio D, Jongkind V, Cuesta MA, Rauwerda JA, Wisselink W. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta: the early learning curve. Surg Endosc 2007;21:17603.
  • 73
    Stádler P, Matous P, Vitásek P, Spacek M. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:91519.
  • 74
    Anderberg M, Kockum CC, Arnbjörnsson E. Robotic fundoplication in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23:1237.
  • 75
    Meehan JJ, Sandler A. Pediatric robotic surgery: a single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2008;22:17782.
  • 76
    Woo R, Le D, Krummel TM, Albanese C. Robot-assisted pediatric surgery. Am J Surg 2004;188:27S37S.
  • 77
    Sinha CK, Haddad M. Robot-assisted surgery in children: current status. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:2336.
  • 78
    McLeod IK, Melder PC. Da Vinci robot-assisted excision of a vallecular cyst: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2005;84:1702.
  • 79
    Tanna N, Joshi AS, Glade RS, Zalkind D, Sadeghi N. Da Vinci robot-assisted endocrine surgery: novel applications in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:6335.
  • 80
    Karas CS, Chiocca EA. Neurosurgical robotics: a review of brain and spine applications. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:3943.
  • 81
    Goto T, Hongo K, Kakizawa Y, Muraoka H, Miyairi Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Clinical application of robotic telemanipulation system in neurosurgery. Case report. J Neurosurg 2003;99:10824.
  • 82
    Nathoo N, Cavuşoğlu MC, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH. In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery 2005;56:42133.
  • 83
    Zimmermann M, Krishnan R, Raabe A, Seifert V. Robot-assisted navigated endoscopic ventriculostomy: implementation of a new technology and first clinical results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146:697704.
  • 84
    Bargar WL. Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;463:316.
  • 85
    Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000;73:10402.
  • 86
    Goldberg JM, Falcone T. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1457.
  • 87
    Rodgers AK, Goldberg JM, Hammel JP, Falcone T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:137580.
  • 88
    Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadière GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:10203.
  • 89
    Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:146777.
  • 90
    Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:6548.
  • 91
    Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, Rossi E, Venturoli S, Bulletti C, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:26638.
  • 92
    Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:51118.
  • 93
    Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S IV, Ransom SB. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:698705.
  • 94
    Senapati S, Advincula AP. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with the da Vinci® surgical system. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:6974.
  • 95
    Mao SP, Lai HC, Chang FW, Yu MH, Chang CC. Laparoscopy-assisted robotic myomectomy using the da Vinci system. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2007;46:1746.
  • 96
    Sroga J, Patel SD. Robotic applications in reproductive endocrinology and infertility. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:310.
  • 97
    Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril;18:2008.
  • 98
    Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2002;16:12713.
  • 99
    Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 2005;9:1315.
  • 100
    Marchal F, Rauch P, Vandromme J, Laurent I, Lobontiu A, Ahcel B, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc 2005;19:82631.
  • 101
    Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:603.
  • 102
    Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 2006;191:55560.
  • 103
    Advincula AP. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2006;2:30511.
  • 104
    Advincula AP, Reynolds RK. The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in the patient with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac. JSLS 2005;9:28791.
  • 105
    Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS 2006;10:31720.
  • 106
    Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:11314.
  • 107
    Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:28691.
  • 108
    Molpus KL, Wedergren JS, Carlson MA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. JSLS 2003;7:5962.
  • 109
    Barmat L, Glaser G, Davis G, Craparo F. Da Vinci-assisted abdominal cerclage. Fertil Steril 2007;88:14373.
  • 110
    Melamud O, Eichel L, Turbow B, Shanberg A. Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction. Urology 2005;65:1636.
  • 111
    Schimpf MO, Morgenstern JH, Tulikangas PK, Wagner JR. Vesicovaginal fistula repair without intentional cystotomy using the laparoscopic robotic approach: a case report. JSLS 2007;11:37880.
  • 112
    Sundaram BM, Kalidasan G, Hemal AK. Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: case series of five patients. Urology 2006;67:9703.
  • 113
    Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 2004;63:3736.
  • 114
    Elliott DS, Frank I, Dimarco DS, Chow GK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 2004;188 (4A Suppl):52S6S.
  • 115
    Elliott DS, Chow GK, Gettman M. Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology. World J Urol 2006;24:18892.
  • 116
    Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 2006;176:6559.
  • 117
    Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Boissel P. Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19:12003.
  • 118
    Draaisma WA, Nieuwenhuis DH, Janssen LWM, Broeders IAMJ. Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse: a prospective cohort study on feasibility and safety. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:2737.
  • 119
    Moreno Sierra J, Galante Romo I, Ortiz Oshiro E, Núñez Mora C, Silmi Moyano A. [Robotic assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse]. Arch Esp Urol 2007;60:4818.
  • 120
    Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, Hernandez JD, Martin S, Darzi A, et al. Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 2004;187:8892.
  • 121
    Decloedt J, Vergote I. Laparoscopy in gynaecologic oncology: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1999;31:1526.
  • 122
    Reynolds RK, Burke WM, Advincula AP. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies. JSLS 2005;9:14958.
  • 123
    Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C. Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2007;21:2446.
  • 124
    Boggess JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:317.
  • 125
    Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Valmadre S, Richardson DL, Jayjohn LA, Jenson C, et al. Robotic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: technical aspects and details of success – the Ohio State University method. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:716.
  • 126
    Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Dreschner CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:679.e1679.e10.
  • 127
    Vergote I, Pouseele B, Van Gorp T, Vanacker B, Leunen K, Cadron I, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:7837.
  • 128
    Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:5313.
  • 129
    Sert B, Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 2007;3:2248.
  • 130
    Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:8691.
  • 131
    Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:31216.
  • 132
    Kowalski L, Falkner CA, Wishnev SA. Robotic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for gynaecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108 (Suppl Abstract 141):S32S155.
  • 133
    Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robot radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:649.e1649.e4.
  • 134
    Danic MJ, Chow M, Alexander G, Bhandari A, Menon M, Brown M. Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1,500 cases. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:11923.
  • 135
    Meininger D, Byhahn C, Mierdl S, Westphal K, Zwissler B. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:77883.
  • 136
    Baltayian S. A brief review: anesthesia for robotic prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:5961.
  • 137
    Prewitt R, Bochkarev V, McBride CL, Kinny S, Oleynikov D. The patterns and costs of the Da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:1720.
  • 138
    Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:182530.
  • 139
    Heemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JW, Jacobs MJ, et al. First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 2005;22:42631.
  • 140
    Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:1714.
  • 141
    Morgan JA, Thornton BA, Peacock JC, Hollingsworth KW, Smith CR, Oz MC, et al. Does robotic technology make minimally invasive cardiac surgery too expensive? A hospital cost analysis of robotic and conventional techniques. J Card Surg 2005;20:24651.
  • 142
    Burgess SV, Atug F, Castle EP, Davis R, Thomas R. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006;20:82730.
  • 143
    Joseph JV, Leonhart A, Patel HRH. The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:214.
  • 144
    Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005;174:23239.
  • 145
    Bhayani SB, Link RE, Varkarakis JM, Kavoussi LR. Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis. J Endourol 2005;19:32732.
  • 146
    Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III, Heaney JA, Seigne JD. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS 2008;12:912.
  • 147
    Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle IW, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008;72:106872.
  • 148
    Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 2004;18:48594.
  • 149
    Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg 2006;106:6624.
  • 150
    Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB, Nyssen AS. Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance. Surg Endosc 2007;21:187582.
  • 151
    Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2003;17:15959.
  • 152
    Vlaovic PD, Sargent ER, Boker JR, Corica FA, Chou DS, Abdelshehid CS, et al. Immediate impact of an intensive one-week laparoscopy training program on laparoscopic skills among postgraduate urologists. JSLS 2008;12:18.
  • 153
    Blaschko SD, Brooks HM, Dhuy SM, Charest-Shell C, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Coordinated multiple cadaver use for minimally invasive surgical training. JSLS 2007;11:4037.
  • 154
    Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl RK, Park JJ, Prasad LM. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 2007;193:34955.
  • 155
    Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, Kashfi A, Kienle P, Konstantinides L, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 2006;20:137682.
  • 156
    Albani JM, Lee DI. Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation. J Endourol 2007;21:2857.
  • 157
    Mimic Technologies, Inc. [www.mimic.ws]. Accessed 16 June 2008.
  • 158
    Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C. VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:2424.
  • 159
    Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C. Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:1459.
  • 160
    SimSurgery AG. [www.simsurgery.com]. Accessed 16 June 2008.
  • 161
    Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Dalinin VV, Mørk BE, Sørhus V, Røtnes JS, et al. Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills. Surg Endosc 2006;20:15659.
  • 162
    Katsavelis D, Siu KC, Brown-Clerk B, Lee IH, Lee YK, Oleynikov D, et al. Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment. Surg Endosc 2008.
  • 163
    Brown-Clerk B, Siu KC, Katsavelis D, Lee I, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Validating advanced robot-assisted laparoscopic training task in virtual reality. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:459.
  • 164
    Sun LW, Van Meer F, Schmid J, Bailly Y, Thakre AA, Yeung CK. Advanced da Vinci Surgical System simulator for surgeon training and operation planning. Int J Med Robot 2007;3:24551.
  • 165
    Fiedler MJ, Chen SJ, Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;125:1279.
  • 166
    Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CB, Smith CD. Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg Endosc 2007;22:12947.
  • 167
    Harper JD, Kaiser S, Ebrahimi K, Lamberton GR, Hadley HR, Ruckle HC, et al. Prior video game exposure does not enhance robotic surgical performance. J Endourol 2007;21:120710.
  • 168
    Hanly EJ, Miller BE, Kumar R, Hasser CJ, Coste-Maniere E, Talamini MA, et al. Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:44551.
  • 169
    Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback. Surg Innov 2008;15:5968.
  • 170
    Ali MR, Loggins JP, Fuller WD, Miller BE, Hasser CJ, Yellowlees P, et al. 3-D telestration: a teaching tool for robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:10712.
  • 171
    Training Centres, Intuitive Surgical. [www.intuitivesurgical.com]. Accessed 16 June 2008.
  • 172
    Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, Felger JE, Bailey BM, Ballint T, et al. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg 2001;234:47584.
  • 173
    Donias HW, Karamanoukian RL, Glick PL, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian HL. Survey of resident training in robotic surgery. Am Surg 2002;68:17781.
  • 174
    Patel YR, Donias HW, Boyd DW, Pande RU, Amodeo JL, Karamanoukian RL, et al. Are you ready to become a robo-surgeon? Am Surg 2003;69:599603.
  • 175
    Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE, et al. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: a comparative study. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:96101.
  • 176
    Rashid HH, Leung YY, Rashid MJ, Oleyourryk G, Valvo JR, Eichel L. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006;68:759.
  • 177
    Thiel DD, Francis P, Heckman MG, Winfield HN. Prospective evaluation of factors affecting operating time in a residency/fellowship training program incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2008;22:13318.
  • 178
    Schroeck FR, de Sousa CA, Kalman RA, Kalia MS, Pierre SA, Haleblian GE, et al. Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate. Urology 2008;71:597601.
  • 179
    Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT. Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:1095108.
  • 180
    Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002;60:3945.
  • 181
    Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB, Nyssen AS. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 2007;194:11521.
  • 182
    DiLorenzo N, Coscarella G, Faraci L, Konopacki D, Pietrantuono M, Gaspari AL. Robotic systems and surgical education. JSLS 2005;9:312.
  • 183
    Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997;84:2738.
  • 184
    Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Datta V, Martin S, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004;18:3728.
  • 185
    Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N. Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 2006;20:96103.
  • 186
    Narula VK, Watson WC, Davis SS, Hinshaw K, Needleman BJ, Mikami DJ, et al. A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 2007;21:225861.
  • 187
    Tavakol M, Mohagheghi MA, Dennick R. Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation. J Surg Educ 2008;65:7783.
  • 188
    Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 2005;66:1057.
  • 189
    Artibani W, Fracalanza S, Cavalleri S, Iafrate M, Aragona M, Novara G, et al. Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008;80:23744.
  • 190
    Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM, Mikhail AA, Gofrit ON, Zagaja GP, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol 2007;21:4417.
  • 191
    Steers WD. Tips on establishing a robotics program in an academic setting. ScientificWorldJournal 2006;6:253141.
  • 192
    Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin GD, Patil N, Patel VR. Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol 2008;22:819824.
  • 193
    Patel VR. Essential elements to the establishment and design of a successful robotic surgery programme. Int J Med Robot 2006;2:2835.
  • 194
    Dickens BM, Cook RJ. Legal and ethical issues in telemedicine and robotics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;94:738.
  • 195
    Andonian S, Okeke Z, Okeke DA, Rastinehad A, Vanderbrink BA, Richstone L, et al. Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database. Can J Urol 2008;15:391216.
  • 196
    Valvo JR, Madeb R, Gilbert R, Nicholson C, Oleyoeryk G, Perrapato S, et al. Policy guidelines suggested for robot-assisted prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:1736.
  • 197
    Herron DM, Marohn M. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2008;22:31325.
  • 198
    World Medical Assocation Statement On The Ethics Of Telemedicine. October 2007 [www.wma.net/e/policy/t3.htm]. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  • 199
    Berlinger NT. Robotic surgery–squeezing into tight places. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2099101.
  • 200
    Gassert R, Burdet E, Chinzei K. MRI-compatible robotics. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008;27:1214.
  • 201
    Sutherland GR, Latour I, Greer AD, Fielding T, Feil G, Newhook P. An image-guided magnetic resonance-compatible surgical robot. Neurosurgery 2008;62:28692.
  • 202
    Hashizume M. MRI-guided laparoscopic and robotic surgery for malignancies. Int J Clin Oncol 2007;12:948.
  • 203
    Melzer A, Gutmann B, Remmele T, Wolf R, Lukoscheck A, Bock M, et al. INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided interventions: principles and evaluation of this MR- and CT-compatible robotic system. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008;27:6673.
  • 204
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:37980.
  • 205
    NASA Prepares for Space Exploration in Undersea Lab. [www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/mar/HQ_06109_NEEMO_9.html]. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  • 206
    Anvari M. Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg 2007;31:154550.
  • 207
    Rentschler ME, Platt SR, Berg K, Dumpert J, Oleynikov D, Farritor SM. Miniature in vivo robots for remote and harsh environments. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2008;12:6675.
  • 208
    NASA project: The RAMS Arms. [www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov/systems/system]. Accessed 20 June 2008.
  • 209
    Sahin E, Winfield A. Special Issue: Swarm Robotics. Swarm Intelligence 2008;2:6972.
  • 210
    Dasgupta P. Robotics in urology. Int J Med Robot 2008;4:12.
  • 211
    Advincula AP. 2007 World Robotic Gyn Symposium: the dawn of a new age in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Robotic Surg 2008;1:1778.