• 1
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007;56.
  • 2
    Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National US Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York, NY: Childbirth Connection, 2006.
  • 3
    Anonymous. BMJ clinical evidence systematic reviews. 2007[]. Accessed 10 December 2007.
  • 4
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Critical appraisal: notes and checklists. 2007 []. Accessed 10 December 2007.
  • 5
    Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence: Number Needed to Treat (NNT). Oxford: Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. []. Accessed 11 February 2008.
  • 6
    Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, Kunz R, Magrini N, Schunemann H. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? Evid Based Med 2006;11:24.
  • 7
    Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest 2006;129:17481.
  • 8
    Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328:1490.
  • 9
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, Kaunitz AM. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:131218.
  • 10
    Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD004945.
  • 11
    Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson L-A, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KA. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:60917.
  • 12
    Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson L-A, Salvesen KA. Women’s experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labour for post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:9506.
  • 13
    Mozurkewich EL, Wolf FM. Premature rupture of membranes at term: a meta-analysis of three management schemes. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:103543.
  • 14
    Lin MG, Nuthalapaty FS, Carver AR, Case AS, Ramsey PS. Misoprostol for labour induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:593601.
  • 15
    Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA, Flenady VJ, Varatharaju B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD005302.
  • 16
    da Graca Krupa F, Cecatti JG, de Castro Surita FG, Milanez HMBP, Parpinelli MA. Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term. BJOG 2005;112:128490.
  • 17
    Levy R, Vaisbuch E, Furman B, Brown D, Volach V, Hagay ZJ. Induction of labour with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term in women with unfavourable cervix: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Perinat Med 2007;35:1269.
  • 18
    Hartling L, Chari R, Friesen C, Vandermeer B, Lacaze-Masmonteil T. A systematic review of intentional delivery in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:17787.
  • 19
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM. Expectant management versus labour induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:9971002.
  • 20
    Irion O, Boulvain M. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD000938.
  • 21
    Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Elective delivery of women with a twin pregnancy from 37 weeks’ gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD003582.
  • 22
    Ek S, Andersson A, Johansson A, Kublicas M. Oligohydramnios in uncomplicated pregnancies beyond 40 completed weeks. A prospective, randomised, pilot study on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:1825.
  • 23
    Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O. Elective delivery in diabetic pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD001997.
  • 24
    Rioseco A, Ivankovic MB, Manzur A, Hamed F, Kato SR, Parer JT, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study of perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:8905.
  • 25
    Roncaglia N, Arreghini A, Locatelli A, Bellini P, Andreotti C, Ghidini A. Obstetric cholestasis: outcome with active management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;100:16770.
  • 26
    Oron G, Hirsch R, Ben-Haroush A, Hod M, Gilboa Y, Davidi O, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with heart disease undergoing induction of labour. BJOG 2004;111:66975.
  • 27
    Rush RW, Mabin T, Bennett MJ. Induction of labour in pregnancy complicated by heart disease. S Afr Med J 1983;64:7368.
  • 28
    Sau AK, Vasishta K, Dhar KK, Khunnu B. Induction of labour in pregnancy complicated by cardiac disease. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;33:379.
  • 29
    Odendaal HJ, Pattinson RC, Bam R, Grove D, Kotze TJ. Aggressive or expectant management for patients with severe preeclampsia between 28-34 weeks’ gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:10705.
  • 30
    Sibai BM, Mercer BM, Schiff E, Friedman SA. Aggressive versus expectant management of severe preeclampsia at 28 to 32 weeks’ gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:81822.
  • 31
    Alexander JM, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Severe preeclampsia and the very low birth weight infant: is induction of labour harmful? Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:4858.
  • 32
    Blackwell SC, Redman ME, Tomlinson M, Landwehr JB Jr, Tuynman M, Gonik B, et al. Labor induction for the preterm severe pre-eclamptic patient: is it worth the effort? J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:30511.
  • 33
    Coppage KH, Polzin WJ. Severe preeclampsia and delivery outcomes: is immediate caesarean delivery beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:9213.
  • 34
    Mashiloane CD, Moodley J. Induction or caesarean section for preterm pre-eclampsia? J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:3536.
  • 35
    Nassar AH, Adra AM, Chakhtoura N, Gomez-Marin O, Beydoun S. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labour induction or elective caesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:12103.
  • 36
    Hall DR, Odendaal HJ, Steyn DW. Delivery of patients with early onset, severe pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;74:14350.
  • 37
    Magann EF, Roberts WE, Perry KG Jr, Chauhan SP, Blake PG, Martin JN Jr. Factors relevant to mode of preterm delivery with syndrome of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:182832.
  • 38
    Tukur J, Umar NI, Khan N, Musa D. Comparison of emergency caesarean section to misoprostol induction for the delivery of antepartum eclamptic patients: a pilot study. Niger J Med 2007;16:3647.
  • 39
    GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003;110:2732.
  • 40
    Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Spiegelhalter DJ, Levene M; GRIT Study Group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:51320.
  • 41
    van den Hove MML, Willekes C, Roumen FJME, Scherjon SA. Intrauterine growth restriction at term: induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;125:548.
  • 42
    Logghe HL, Mason GC, Thornton JG, Stringer MD. A randomized controlled trial of elective preterm delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:172631.
  • 43
    Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, et al. Induction of labour compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996;334:100510.
  • 44
    Spinnato JA, Shaver DC, Bray EM, Lipshitz J. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes with fetal pulmonary maturity present: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:196201.
  • 45
    Mercer BM, Crocker LG, Boe NM, Sibai BM. Induction versus expectant management in premature rupture of the membranes with mature amniotic fluid at 32 to 36 weeks: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:77582.
  • 46
    Cox SM, Leveno KJ. Intentional delivery versus expectant management with preterm ruptured membranes at 30-34 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:8759.
  • 47
    Naef RW III, Allbert JR, Ross EL, Weber BM, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Premature rupture of membranes at 34 to 37 weeks’ gestation: aggressive versus conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:12630.
  • 48
    van der Ham DP, Nijhuis JG, Mol BWJ, van Beek JJ, Opmeer BC, Bijlenga D, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:11.
  • 49
    Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labour versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000;49:247.
  • 50
    Kjos S, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA, Mestman JH. Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labour and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:61115.
  • 51
    Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Aarnoudse JG, van Beek E, Bekedam DJ, van den Berg PP, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring in women with pregnancy induced hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term: the HYPITAT trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:14.
  • 52
    Boers KE, Bijlenga D, Mol BWJ, LeCessie S, Birnie E, van Pampus MG, et al. Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term: DIGITAT. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:12.
  • 53
    Leung WC, Lao TT. Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation: nonsensus consensus. [comment]. BJOG 2002;109:141617.
  • 54
    Angstetra D, Ferguson J, Giles WB. Institution of universal screening for Group B streptococcus (GBS) from a risk management protocol results in reduction of early-onset GBS disease in a tertiary obstetric unit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:37882.