• 1
    Benson-Harer W. Patient choice caesarean. ACOG Clin Rev 2000;5:115.
  • 2
    Annandale E. The Sociology of Health and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
  • 3
    Kalish RB, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet 2006;367:8835.
  • 4
    National Institutes of Health. State-of-the-Science-Conference: cesarean delivery on maternal request: final statement. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:138697.
  • 5
    Moorhead J. Are you too posh to push? The way you give birth has become a status symbol of our times. And by 2010 half of all women will refuse to endure the pain of natural birth. Daily Mail 1999 January 26;3637.
  • 6
    Potter JE, Berquó E, Perpétuo IHO, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, et al. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: a prospective study. Br Med J 2001;323:11558.
  • 7
    Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women’s request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 2000;27:25663.
  • 8
    McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, Creedy D. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2007;34:6579.
  • 9
    Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Yaser A, Carty V, Svigos JM, Robinson JS. Women’s role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section. Med J Aust 1999;170:5803.
  • 10
    Edwards GJ, Davies NJ. Elective caesarean section—the patient’s choice. J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;21:1289.
  • 11
    Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinal Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
  • 12
    Pang MW, Lee TS, Leung AKL, Leung TY, Lau TK, Leung TN. A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women. BJOG 2007;114:6239.
  • 13
    Childbirth Connection. Listening to Mothers II. Survey Report. New York: Childbirth Connection, 2006.
  • 14
    Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians’ personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1997;73:14.
  • 15
    Gabbe SG, Holzman GB. Obstetricians choice of delivery. Lancet 2001;357:722.
  • 16
    Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologist’s knowledge, perception and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:5766.
  • 17
    Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, et al. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians’ attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG 2006;113:64756.
  • 18
    Gossman GL, Joesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:150616.
  • 19
    Declercq G, Norsigian J. Mothers aren’t behind a vogue for caesareans. Boston Globe 2006;A15.
  • 20
    Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003;348:94650.
  • 21
    Department of Health. Maternity Statistics, England: 2003–04. London: Office of National Statistics, 2005.
  • 22
    Department of Health. Changing Childbirth: Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993.
  • 23
    Department of Health. NHS choices: delivering for the NHS. 2008 []. Accessed 8 April 2008.
  • 24
    Department of Health. Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service. HMSO, 2007. []. Accessed 3 March 2009.
  • 25
    National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Caesarean Section Clinical Guideline 2004. London: RCOG Press, 2004.
  • 26
    Maddocks J. Merseyside and Cheshire Perinatal Annual Report (Including the Isle of Man). Liverpool: Merseyside Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2002.
  • 27
    Bennett A. The birth of a first child: do women’s reports change over time? Birth 1985;12:15385.
  • 28
    Simkin P. Just another day in a woman’s life? Part II: Nature and consistency of women’s long-term memories of their first birth experiences. Birth 1992;19:6481.
  • 29
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994.
  • 30
    Chesler M. Professionals’ Views of the “Dangers” of Self-Help Groups (CRSO Paper 345). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Social Organisation, 1987.
  • 31
    Kukartz U. [Developer] WinMax Pro software for qualitative data analysis. Berlin, Germany, 1998. (Successor Versions since 2001: MAXqda) []. Accessed 1 August 2006.
  • 32
    Baker L Women’s views towards participating in research in a maternity setting: A longitudinal cohort study. MPhil Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 2007.
  • 33
    Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 2006;114:8693.