SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329:1925.
  • 2
    Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:25819.
  • 3
    Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:38.
  • 4
    Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:1716.
  • 5
    Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG 2007;114:120814.
  • 6
    Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG 2005;112:12218.
  • 7
    Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Öry F, Bloemenkamp KWM, de Vries JIP, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population based study of 371 000 pregnancies. BJOG 2008;115:84250.
  • 8
    The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Perinatal Care in The Netherlands 2005. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Perinatal Registry, 2007.
  • 9
    Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Statline, Central Bureau of Statistics. 2007 [http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/]. Accessed 2 October 2007.
  • 10
    Dutch Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NVOG). Nationwide IVF results. 2005 [http://www.nvog.nl/files/landelijkeivfcijfers2005.pdf]. Accessed 23 October 2007.
  • 11
    Teunissen KK, Lopriore E, Nijman RG, Brouwer PA, van Kamp IL. Silent uterine rupture, an unusual cause of anhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:e89.
  • 12
    Landon MB. Uterine rupture in primigravid women. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:70910.
  • 13
    Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128:25761.
  • 14
    Lewis GG, editor. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mother’s Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer—2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternity Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.
  • 15
    Miller DA, Goodwin TM, Gherman RB, Paul RH. Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:6713.
  • 16
    Ofir K, Sheiner E, Levy A, Katz M, Mazor M. Uterine rupture: differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:4259.
  • 17
    Zwart JJ, van Huisseling HC, Schuttevaer HM, van Roosmalen J, Oepkes D. Nearly fatal uterine rupture during manual removal of the placenta: a case report. J Reprod Med 2007;52:9746.
  • 18
    Weiss J, Nannini A, Fogerty S, Sachs B. Use of hospital discharge data to monitor uterine rupture—Massachusetts, 1990–1997; US Department of Health & Human Services. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000;49:2458.
  • 19
    Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section. BJOG 2005;112:4515.
  • 20
    Grossetti E, Vardon D, Creveuil C, Herlicoviez M, Dreyfus M. Rupture of the scarred uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:5728.
  • 21
    Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, Pollock M, Maas B, Colmorgen G. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:6037.
  • 22
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. 2007 [http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/public/pdf/green_top45_birthafter.pdf]. Accessed 30 November 2007.
  • 23
    Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:137583.
  • 24
    Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:91727.
  • 25
    Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:86471.
  • 26
    Kotaska A. Inappropriateness of randomised trials for complex phenomena: are the results of the term breech trial generalisable? BMJ 2004;329:103942.
  • 27
    Molkenboer JF, Roumen FJ, Smits LJ, Nijhuis JG. Birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcome of children at 2 years of age after planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:6249.