Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda
Article first published online: 4 SEP 2009
© 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2009 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Special Issue: International Reviews
Volume 116, Issue Supplement s1, pages 18–21, October 2009
How to Cite
van den Broek, N. and Graham, W. (2009), Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116: 18–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x
- Issue published online: 4 SEP 2009
- Article first published online: 4 SEP 2009
- Accepted 13 July 2009.
- Quality of Care;
- Maternal and Newborn Health;
- Quality Improvement Tools;
- Developing Countries
The quality of care received by mothers and babies in developing countries is often reported as poor. Yet efforts to address this contributory factor to maternal and newborn mortality have received less attention compared with barriers of access to care. The current heightened concern to achieve Millennium Development Goals 4 & 5 has illuminated the neglected quality agenda. Whilst there is no universally-accepted definition of “quality care”, it is widely acknowledged to embrace multiple levels – from patient to health system, and multiple dimensions, including safety as well as efficiency. Quality care should thus lie at the core of all strategies for accelerating progress towards MDG4 &5. Interventions to measure and improve quality need themselves to be evidence-based. Two promising approaches are maternal and perinatal death reviews and criterion-based audit. These and other quality improvement tools have a crucial role to play in the implementation of effective maternal and newborn care.