SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Clark TJ, Voit D, Gupta JK, Hyde C, Song F, Khan KS. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. JAMA 2002;288:161021.
  • 2
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Standards for Gynaecology. Report of a Working Party. London: RCOG Press, 2008.
  • 3
    Busquets M, Lemus M. Practicability of panoramic hysteroscopy with CO2. Clinical experience: 923 cases. [Spanish] Factibilidad de histeroscopia panoramica con CO2. Experiencia clinica: 923 casos. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 1993;58:1138.
  • 4
    Clark TJ, Gupta JK. Handbook of Outpatient Hysteroscopy. A Complete Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy, 1st edn. London: Hodder Education, 2005.
  • 5
    Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4:2558.
  • 6
    Garbin O, Kutnahorsky R, Gollner JL, Vayssiere C. Vaginoscopic versus conventional approaches to outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: a two-centre randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 2006;21:29963000.
  • 7
    Sharma M, Taylor A, Di Spiezio SA, Buck L, Mastrogamvrakis G, Kosmas I, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the ‘no-touch’ technique. BJOG 2005;112:9637.
  • 8
    Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: CRD, University of York, 2009.
  • 9
    The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. [http://www.cochrane-handbook.org2008February(5.0.0)]. Accessed 3rd June 2009.
  • 10
    Khan KS, Kunz R., Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-based Medicine. How to Review and Apply Findings of Healthcare Research, 1st edn. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd, 2003.
  • 11
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:15974.
  • 12
    Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, Penman M, Tugwell P, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials 1995;16:6273.
  • 13
    Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Russell LA. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:5377.
  • 14
    RevMan 5 [computer program]. Version 5 2008. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
  • 15
    Almeida ZM, Pontes R, Costa HL. Evaluation of pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy by vaginoscopy using normal saline at body temperature as distension medium: a randomized controlled trial. [Portuguese] Avaliacao da dor na histeroscopia diagnostica por vaginoscopia utilizando-se, como meio de distensao, solucao salina a temperatura corporal: Ensaio clinico randomizado. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia 2008;30:2530.
  • 16
    Sagiv R, Sadan O, Boaz M, Dishi M, Schechter E, Golan A. A new approach to office hysteroscopy compared with traditional hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:38792.
  • 17
    Guida M, Di Spiezio SA, Acunzo G, Sparice S, Bramante S, Piccoli R, et al. Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 2006;21:32537.
  • 18
    Paschopoulos M, Anastassopoulus P, Kaponis A, Avgoustatos F, Papadononpoulos L, Lolis D. Vaginoscopic versus conventional approach to outpatient hysteroscopy A comparative randomised study. Gynaecological Endoscopy 2000;51(Suppl).