Gynaecological oncology
Progestogen treatment options for early endometrial cancer
Article first published online: 12 APR 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02552.x
© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Issue

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 117, Issue 7, pages 879–884, June 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cade, T., Quinn, M., Rome, R. and Neesham, D. (2010), Progestogen treatment options for early endometrial cancer. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 117: 879–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02552.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 10 MAY 2010
- Article first published online: 12 APR 2010
- Accepted 16 November 2009. Published Online 12 April 2010.
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Endometrial cancer;
- levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system;
- progestins;
- progestogens
Please cite this paper as: Cade T, Quinn M, Rome R, Neesham D. Progestogen treatment options for early endometrial cancer. BJOG 2010;117:879–884.
Objective Premenopausal women with early endometrial cancer may wish to maintain their fertility, and for some patients non-surgical treatment options may be attractive. We have examined our own experience with such patients, as there are limited published data so far to support clear guidelines in this area.
Design Retrospective analysis of a case series.
Setting Case series from a specialist gynaecological oncology unit in a major tertiary referral hospital.
Sample Sixteen patients receiving progestogen therapy for stage-1 endometrial cancer.
Methods We reviewed our experience of all patients receiving progestogen therapy for stage-1 endometrial cancer, and we particularly examined their cancer-free outcome and fertility potential.
Main outcome measures Response to treatment, duration of response, and subsequent pregnancies.
Results Of the 16 patients investigated, four received an oral progestogen, five received the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena), and seven received both forms of treatment. Ten patients (63%) responded to treatment, with a median time to response of 5.5 months. Six patients did not respond to treatment, but all were either early in treatment or opted for surgical management before the average time of response. No patient who responded had a later recurrence. The mean total follow-up time was 27 months (range 3–134 months), with no patient deaths. Three patients had successful pregnancies, with one patient having two children.
Conclusions This form of treatment appears to be a realistic treatment option in selected patients in the closely supervised environment of a specialist gynaecological oncology unit.

1471-0528/asset/BJO_left.gif?v=1&s=0fb87361cdb6be25fdf05019eed6d47f5143f610)
1471-0528/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=3892ef16ff18d6834c302faf85268a49f5fc588f)