Members are listed at the end of the article.
Intrapartum tests for group B streptococcus: accuracy and acceptability of screening
Article first published online: 13 OCT 2010
© 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Special Issue: Infections in Pregnancy
Volume 118, Issue 2, pages 257–265, January 2011
How to Cite
Daniels, J., Gray, J., Pattison, H., Gray, R., Hills, R., Khan, K. and on behalf of the GBS Collaborative Group (2011), Intrapartum tests for group B streptococcus: accuracy and acceptability of screening. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 118: 257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02725.x
- Issue published online: 15 DEC 2010
- Article first published online: 13 OCT 2010
- Accepted 11 August 2010. Published Online 13 October 2010.
- Group B streptococcus;
- intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics;
Please cite this paper as: Daniels J, Gray J, Pattison H, Gray R, Hills R, Khan K on behalf of the GBS Collaborative Group. Intrapartum tests for group B streptococcus: accuracy and acceptability of screening. BJOG 2011;118:257–265.
Objective To assess the accuracy and acceptability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and optical immunoassay (OIA) tests for the detection of maternal group B streptococcus (GBS) colonisation during labour, comparing their performance with the current UK policy of risk factor-based screening.
Design Diagnostic test accuracy study.
Setting and population Fourteen hundred women in labour at two large UK maternity units provided vaginal and rectal swabs for testing.
Methods The PCR and OIA index tests were compared with the reference standard of selective enriched culture, assessed blind to index tests. Factors influencing neonatal GBS colonisation were assessed using multiple logistic regression, adjusting for antibiotic use. The acceptability of testing to participants was evaluated through a structured questionnaire administered after delivery.
Main outcome measures The sensitivity and specificity of PCR, OIA and risk factor-based screening.
Results Maternal GBS colonisation was 21% (19–24%) by combined vaginal and rectal swab enriched culture. PCR test of either vaginal or rectal swabs was more sensitive (84% [79–88%] versus 72% [65–77%]) and specific (87% [85–89%] versus 57% [53–60%]) than OIA (P < 0.001), and far more sensitive (84 versus 30% [25–35%]) and specific (87 versus 80% [77–82%]) than risk factor-based screening (P < 0.001). Maternal antibiotics (odds ratio, 0.22 [0.07–0.62]; P = 0.004) and a positive PCR test (odds ratio, 29.4 [15.8–54.8]; P < 0.001) were strongly related to neonatal GBS colonisation, whereas risk factors were not (odds ratio, 1.44 [0.80–2.62]; P = 0.2).
Conclusion Intrapartum PCR screening is a more accurate predictor of maternal and neonatal GBS colonisation than is OIA or risk factor-based screening, and is acceptable to women.