SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    James WH. The sex ratios of Black births. Ann Hum Biol 1984;11:3944.
  • 2
    Ruder A. Paternal factors affect the human secondary sex ratio in interracial births. Hum Biol 1986;58:35766.
  • 3
    James WH. Secular movements in sex ratios of adults and of births in populations during the past half-century. Hum Reprod 2000;15:117883.
  • 4
    Jacobsen R, Møller H, Mouritsen A. Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Hum Reprod 1999;14:31205.
  • 5
    Wang YA, Dean JH, Badgery-Parker T, Sullivan EA. Assisted Reproduction Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2006. Assisted Reproduction Technology Series No. 12, Cat. No. PER 43. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2008. 74 pp.
  • 6
    MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978–87. Br Med J 1990;300:122933.
  • 7
    Källén B, Finnstrom O, Nygren K-G, Olausson PO. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: infant outcome after different IVF fertilization methods. Fertil Steril 2005;84:6117.
  • 8
    Thatcher SS, Restrepo U, Lavy G, DeCherney AH. In-vitro fertilisation and sex ratio. Lancet 1989;333:10256.
  • 9
    Ghazzawi IM, Sarraf M, Alhasani S. Children born after ICSI: are we altering sex ratio? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000;70(Suppl 2):B66.
  • 10
    Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde M-P, Camus M, Devroey P, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod 2002;17:67194.
  • 11
    Scott J, Ryan JP. Sex ratio of infants born following blastocyst culture. Hum Reprod 2006;21(Suppl 1):i16.
  • 12
    Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Stern JE, Baker VL, Ginsburg E. The sex-ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2007;88(Suppl 1):S29.
  • 13
    Barnes FL, Crombie A, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lacham-Kaplan O, Suikkari A-M, et al. Blastocyst development and birth after in-vitro maturation of human primary oocytes, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and assisted hatching. Hum Reprod 1995;10:32437.
  • 14
    Behr B, Pool TB, Milki AA, Moore D, Gebhardt J, Dasig D. Preliminary clinical experience with human blastocyst development in vitro without co-culture. Hum Reprod 1999;14:4547.
  • 15
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Hum Reprod 2000;15(Suppl 6):923.
  • 16
    Jones GM, Trounson AO. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits of extended culture. Hum Reprod 1999;14:14058.
  • 17
    Pergament E, Fiddler M, Cho N, Johnson D, Holmgren WJ. Sexual differentiation and preimplantation cell growth. Hum Reprod 1994;9:17302.
  • 18
    Ménézo YJR, Chouteau J, Torelló MJ, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertil Steril 1999;72:2214.
  • 19
    Barritt J, Duke M, Klein J, Devenuta A, Sandler B, Copperman A. Single embryo blastocyst transfer may lead to an altered sex ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril 2005;84(Suppl 1):S89.
  • 20
    Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril 2007;87:51923.
  • 21
    Kausche A, Jones GM, Trounson AO, Figueiredo F, MacLachlan V, Lolatgis N. Sex ratio and birth weights of infants born as a result of blastocyst transfers compared with early cleavage stage embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2001;76:68893.
  • 22
    Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Westphal LW, Giudice LC, Behr B. Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:3236.
  • 23
    Richter KS, Anderson M, Osborn BH. Selection for faster development does not bias sex ratios resulting from blastocyst embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:4605.
  • 24
    Weston G, Osianlis T, Catt J, Vollenhoven B. Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril 2009;92:13025.
  • 25
    Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr, Frattarelli JL. Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2009;92:9137.
  • 26
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1992;1:98101.
    Direct Link:
  • 27
    Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Br Med J 1995;311:485.
  • 28
    James WH. The human sex ratio. Part 1: a review of the literature. Hum Biol 1987;59:72151.
  • 29
    Shaw R, Mohler J. The selective significance of the sex ratio. Am Nat 1953;87:337.
  • 30
    Victorian Government Legislation. Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008. No 76; 2008.
  • 31
    Reproductive Technology Council. Policy on Approval for Diagnostic Procedures Involving Embryos. Western Australia: Department of Health, 2008.
  • 32
    Government of South Australia. Reproductive Technology (Clinical Practices) Act 1988. South Australia: South Australian Legislation, 1988.
  • 33
    National Health and Medical Research Council. Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research. 2007 [http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e78syn.htm]. Accessed 8 December 2008.
  • 34
    United Nations. The 2008 Revision Population Database: Sex Ratio at Birth. World Population Prospects [Electronic population database]. 2009. UN Population Division]. [http://www.esa.un.org/unpp/index.asp?panel=2]. Accessed 22 January 2010.
  • 35
    Hentemann M, Briskemyr S, Bertheussen K. Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:4336.
  • 36
    Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Baker VL, Ginsburg E, Stern JE. The sex ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2009;92:157985.
  • 37
    Graffelman J, Fugger EF, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Human live birth and sperm-sex ratios compared. Hum Reprod 1999;14:291720.
  • 38
    Lobel SM, Pomponio RJ, Mutter GL. The sex ratio of normal and manipulated human sperm quantitated by the polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril 1993;59:38792.
  • 39
    ASRM. Blastocyst production and transfer in clinical assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2004;82(Suppl 1):s14950.
  • 40
    Chang HJ, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2009;91:238190.
  • 41
    Tarin JJ, Bernabeu R, Baviera A, Bonada M, Cano A. Sex selection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programmes. Hum Reprod 1995;10:29928.
  • 42
    Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RML, Handyside AH. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1995;104:16571.
  • 43
    Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients. Fertil Steril 2002;77:6936.
  • 44
    Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997;315:62934.
  • 45
    Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:153958.
  • 46
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:11558.
  • 47
    Beyeler M, Haberle M, Hohl M. Comparison of pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection between the embryo transfer on day 2 and on day 5 (blastocyst transfer). A controlled matched-pair analysis. J Fertil Reprod 2002;12:119.
  • 48
    Beesley R, Robinson R, Propst A, Arthur N, Retzloff M. Impact of day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer on pregnancy rates and multiple gestations. Fertil Steril 2009;91:171720.
  • 49
    de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010;25:185162.
  • 50
    Jain T, Gupta RS. Trends in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2517.
  • 51
    ICMART. World Collaborative Report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002. Hum Reprod 2009;24:231020.
  • 52
    Kochhar HPS, Peippo J, King WA. Sex related embryo development. Theriogenology 2001;55:314.
  • 53
    Wang YA, Chambers GM, Dieng M, Sullivan EA. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia and New Zealand 2007. Assisted Reproductive Technology No. 13, Cat. No. PER 47, 1st edn. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, 2009. 66 pp.
  • 54
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority UK. HFEA fertility facts and figures 2007. 2009 [http://www.hfea.gov.uk/104.html]. Accessed 23 July 2010.
  • 55
    CDC MMWR. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance – United States, 2006. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009. pp. 125.
  • 56
    Greenhall E, Vessey M. The prevalence of subfertility: a review of the current confusion and a report of two new studies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1991;46:3978.
  • 57
    Myrskyla M, Kohler H-P, Billari FC. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 2009;460:7413.
  • 58
    Suzuki T. Lowest-low fertility in Korea and Japan. J Popul Probl 2003;59:116.
  • 59
    Sleebos J. Low fertility rates in OECD countries: facts and policy responses, OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 15, 2003, Paris: OECD Publishing.