SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet 2010;375:4909.
  • 2
    CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG 2010;117: 136676.
  • 3
    Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23:CD004662.
  • 4
    Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP. Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med 2008;26:31321.
  • 5
    Kim S, Lee S, Greene AK, Arsenault DA, Le H, Meisel J, et al. Inhibition of intra-abdominal adhesion formation with the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib. J Surg Res 2008;149:1159.
  • 6
    Ray NF, Larsen JW, Stillman RJ, Jacobs RJ. Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:2716.
  • 7
    Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:61521.
  • 8
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:200812.
  • 9
    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:14537.
  • 10
    Hema KR, Johanson R. Techniques for performing caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001;15:1747.
  • 11
    Bristow RE, Montz FJ. Prevention of adhesion formation after radical oophorectomy using a sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose (HA-CMC) barrier. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:3018.
  • 12
    AL-Took S, Platt R, Tulandi T. Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction after gynecologic operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;80: 3135.
  • 13
    Myers SA, Bennett TL. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure. J Reprod Med 2005;50:65962.
  • 14
    The Cochrane Collaboration open learning material. [http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/HTML/mod12-3.htm]. Last accessed 10 April 2010.
  • 15
    Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods 2006;11:193206.
  • 16
    Chen J, Chen X. Analysis of thirty cases repeat Stark’s caesarean section. J Prac Med 2002;18:10901.
  • 17
    Ran C, Li N, Mu X. Analysis of abdominal adhesion after primary Stark’s caesarean section. J Prac Obstet Gynecol 2004;20:276.
  • 18
    Cheng L. Clinical analysis of abdominal adhesion after Stark’s cesarean section. J Sun Yat-sen Univ (Med Sci) 2005;26:2201.
  • 19
    Deng X. Clinical analysis of 133 cases of repeated caesarean section. Guangxi Med J 2005;27:7289.
  • 20
    Hao C, Guo Z, Zhao C, Liu Y, Liu Z, Li S. Comparison of pelvic and abdominal adhesion after different caesarean sections. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 2005;40:7756.
  • 21
    Li H. Clinical analysis of 82 cases of repeated caesarean section. Guangxi Med J 2005;27:10801.
  • 22
    Wang Z. Observation of abdominal adhesion after Stark’s cesarean section. Matern Child Health Care China 2005;20:23556.
  • 23
    Yang A, Liang L. Influence of Stark’s caesarean section on repeat caesarean section. Youjiang Med J 2005;33:334.
  • 24
    Yu Q. Analysis of abdominal adhesion after Stark’s caesarean section. Matern Child Health Care China 2005;20:12212.
  • 25
    Ding X. Clinical observation of pelvic and abdominal adhesion after Stark’s caesarean section. Chin Prac Med 2006;1:1123.
  • 26
    Hong J. Primary investigation into pelvic adhesion after Stark’s caesarean section. Hainan Med J 2006;17:89, 71.
  • 27
    Lin S, Zhu L. Analysis of abdominal cavity adhesion after Stark’s caesarean section. J Prac Med Tech 2006;13:957.
  • 28
    Luo R, Yan Q, Luo Z. The discussion of abdominal cavity adhesion in new style cesarean section to the second cesarean section. J Gannan Med Univ 2006;26:2402.
  • 29
    Niu X. Clinical observation of adhesion after Stark’s caesarean section. Hainan Med J 2006;17:85.
  • 30
    Qu H, Chen Y. A clinical study of 238 cases of repeated cesarean section. J Tongji Univ (Med Sci) 2006;27:679.
  • 31
    Tian H. Clinical observation of stark section as secondary abdominal surgery. J Chin Modern Gynecol Obstet 2006;3:106971.
  • 32
    Xu Z. Clinical analysis of 188 cases of repeated cesarean section. Chin J Prac Med 2006;5:7723.
  • 33
    Zhang L. Comparison of pelvic and abdominal adhesion at repeated operation after different cesarean section. Modern J Integr Trad Chin Western Med 2006;15:23278.
  • 34
    Chen Z, Liang M. Investigation into abdominal adhesion after three methods of cesarean section. J Clin Med Pract 2007;11:8990.
  • 35
    Hamel KJ. Incidence of adhesions at repeat caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:e312.
  • 36
    Huang D. Clinical analysis of 482 cases of repeated caesarean section. Guangxi Med J 2007;29:15412.
  • 37
    Kang L, Yang L, Cai J. Clinical analysis of 136 cases of repeated cesarean section. Henan J Surg 2007;13:812.
  • 38
    Liu A, Zhong Y. Analysis of pelvic adhesion after two methods of cesarean section. Guangxi Med J 2007;29:119.
  • 39
    Wang B. Comparison of pelvic and abdominal adhesion after different methods of cesarean section. J Commun Med 2007;5:745.
  • 40
    Wang Z, Li S. Comparison of abdominal adhesion after modified and Stark’s section. Chin J Postgrad Med 2007;30:63.
  • 41
    Wang Q, Zhao M. Perioperative analysis of 90 cases of repeated cesarean section. J Qiannan Med College Nationalities 2007;20:778.
  • 42
    Zheng W, Xia Y, Wu H, Lu H. The new mode and midline incision for caesarean section and abdomen cavity adhesions. Matern Child Health Care China 2007;22:137981.
  • 43
    Chen J. Clinical analysis of 110 cases of repeated cesarean section. IMHGN 2008;14:489.
  • 44
    Liang P, Jiao A, Liu S. Comparison of adhesion in abdominal cavity after modified Stark’s section and Stark’s section. Shandong Med J 2008;48:93.
  • 45
    Nian Q. Clinical analysis of 113 cases with peritoneal adhesion after cesarean section. Med Recapitulate 2008;14:78990.
  • 46
    Song Y. Clinical analysis of 119 cases of repeated cesarean section. Chin J Prac Med 2008;35:601.
  • 47
    Wang R, Cao C. Clinical analysis of 42 cases of modified Stark’s section. J Clin Experimental Med 2008;7:126.
  • 48
    Zhang J. Comparison of different abdominal and pelvic cavity adhesion of cesarean sections. Chin J Trauma Disability Med 2009; 17:60.
  • 49
    Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesion Research Study. BJOG 2000;107: 85562.
  • 50
    Luijendijk RW, de Lange DC, Wauters CC, Hop WC, Duron JJ, Pailler JL, et al. Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg 1996;223:2428.
  • 51
    Montz FJ, Shimanuki T, DeZerega GS. Postsurgical mesothelial reepithelialization. In: DeCherneyAG, PolanML, editors. Reproductive Surgery. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publisher, 1987. pp. 3148.
  • 52
    Hubbard TB, Khan MZ, Carag VR, Albites VE, Hricko GM. The pathology of peritoneal repair: its relation to the formation of adhesions. Ann Surg 1967;165:90816.
  • 53
    Lyell DJ, Caughey AB, Hu E, Daniels K. Peritoneal closure at primary caesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:27580.
  • 54
    Cheong YC, Premkumar G, Metwally M, Peacock JL, Li TC. To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;47:38.
  • 55
    Song F, Sheldon TA, Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 2001;24: 12651.
  • 56
    Wallwiener D, Meyer A, Bastert G. Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers? Fertil Steril 1998;69: 1327.
  • 57
    Blumenfeld YJ, Caughey AB, El-Sayed YY, Daniels K, Lyell DJ. Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions. BJOG 2010;117:6904.
  • 58
    Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996;312:12158.
  • 59
    Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 1998;316:1404.