SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Michelle M. Butler, Lucille Sheehy, Mary (Maureen) Kington, Maura C. Walsh, Mary C. Brosnan, Martina Murphy, Corina Naughton, Jonathan Drennan, Theresa Barry, Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: Choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 4, 418

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Michelle M. Butler, Mary C. Brosnan, Jonathan Drennan, Patricia Feeney, Orla Gavigan, Maureen Kington, Denise O'Brien, Lucille Sheehy, Maura C. Walsh, Evaluating midwifery-led antenatal care: Using a programme logic model to identify relevant outcomes, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 1, e34

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Mary A. Biro, Michelle Knight, Euan Wallace, Kerrie Papacostas, Christine East, Is place of birth associated with mode of birth? The effect of hospital on caesarean section rates in a public metropolitan health service, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014, 54, 1
  4. 4
    Stine Bernitz, Pål Øian, Rune Rolland, Leiv Sandvik, Ellen Blix, Oxytocin and dystocia as risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: A cohort of low-risk nulliparous women, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 3, 364

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Jørg Kessler, Branka Yli, Admission CTG, is there any evidence from which to draw conclusions?, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013, 92, 7
  6. 6
    Tonje Lippert, Ellen Nesje, Karen Sofie Koss, Pål Øian, Change in risk status during labor in a large Norwegian obstetric department: a prospective study, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013, 92, 6
  7. 7
    Hyun-Hwa Cha, Suk-Joo Choi, Soo-young Oh, Cheong-Rae Roh, Jong-Hwa Kim, Comparison of neonatal outcomes and intrapartum events in full term vaginal deliveries conducted by staff versus resident physicians, Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 2013, 56, 6, 362

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Stine Bernitz, Eline Aas, Pål Øian, Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial, Midwifery, 2012, 28, 5, 591

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jennifer Bailit, Impact of Non-Clinical Factors on Primary Cesarean Deliveries, Seminars in Perinatology, 2012, 36, 5, 395

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    P Ashworth, A El Fara, S Ebaji, Level of birth care and operative delivery rates, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012, 119, 3
  11. 11
    S Bernitz, Level of birth care and operative delivery rates, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012, 119, 3
  12. 12
    BRITT-INGJERD NESHEIM, Low-risk labor – outcomes after introduction of special guidelines combined with increased awareness of risk category, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012, 91, 4
  13. 13
    Bénédicte Coulm, Camille Ray, Nathalie Lelong, Nicolas Drewniak, Jennifer Zeitlin, Béatrice Blondel, Obstetric Interventions for Low-Risk Pregnant Women in France: Do Maternity Unit Characteristics Make a Difference?, Birth, 2012, 39, 3
  14. 14
    Corrigenda, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2011, 118, 13
  15. 15
    Errata, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2011, 118, 13
  16. 16
    Ellen D Hodnett, Soo Downe, Denis Walsh, Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth, The Cochrane Library,
  17. 17
    Jane Sandall, Hora Soltani, Simon Gates, Andrew Shennan, Declan Devane, Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women, The Cochrane Library,