SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993;12:18692.
  • 2
    Sasieni P, Adams J. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model. BMJ 1999;318:12445.
  • 3
    NHSCSP. Colposcopy and Programme Management: Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme, 2nd edn. London: NHSCSP, 2010.
  • 4
    Jordan J, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Schenck U, Baldauf JJ, Da Silva D, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1. Cytopathology 2008;19:34254.
  • 5
    Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition – summary document. Ann Oncol 2010;21:44858.
  • 6
    Massad LS, Halperin CJ, Bitterman P. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:4003.
  • 7
    Mousavi AS, Fakour F, Gilani MM, Behtash N, Ghaemmaghami F, Karimi Zarchi M. A prospective study to evaluate the correlation between Reid colposcopic index impression and biopsy histology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11:14750.
  • 8
    Moss EL, Hadden P, Douce G, Jones PW, Arbyn M, Redman CWE. Is the colpscopically-directed punch biopsy a reliable diagnositc test in women with minor cytological lesions? J Low Genit Tract Disease 2012;4 Jun [Epub ahead of print].
  • 9
    Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337:a1284.
  • 10
    Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:48998.
  • 11
    Anderson MC. Invasive carcinoma of the cervix following local destructive treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:65763.
  • 12
    Shumsky AG, Stuart GC, Nation J. Carcinoma of the cervix following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1994;53:504.
  • 13
    Sorbye SW, Arbyn M, Fismen S, Gutteberg TJ, Mortensen ES. HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing is more specific than cytology in post-colposcopy follow-up of women with negative cervical biopsy. PLoS ONE ????;6:e26022.
  • 14
    Jeronimo J, Schiffman M. Colposcopy at a crossroads. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:34953.
  • 15
    Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathol Annu 1973;8:30128.
  • 16
    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
  • 17
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:17788.
  • 18
    Cochran W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954;10:10129.
  • 19
    Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epide-miol 2005;58:98290.
  • 20
    Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 2001;20:286584.
  • 21
    Chu H, Cole SR. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:13312. author reply 2–3.
  • 22
    Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 2007;8:23951.
  • 23
    Burger MP, Hollema H. The reliability of the histologic diagnosis in colposcopically directed biopsies. A plea for LETZ. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1993;3:38590.
  • 24
    Ortiz R, Newton M, Langlois PL. Colposcopic biopsy in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34:3036.
  • 25
    Savage EW. Correlation of colposcopically directed biopsy and conization with histologic diagnosis of cervical lesions. J Reprod Med 1975;15:21113.
  • 26
    Hovadhanakul P, Mehra U, Terragno A, Taylor HB, Cavanagh D. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;142:3336.
  • 27
    Kirkup W, Hill AS. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:14.
  • 28
    Veridiano NP, Delke I, Tancer ML. Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in patients with cervical neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58:1857.
  • 29
    Helmerhorst TJ, Dijkhuizen GH, Calame JJ, Kwikkel HJ, Stolk JG. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of CIN. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1987;24:2219.
  • 30
    McIndoe GA, Robson MS, Tidy JA, Mason WP, Anderson MC. Laser excision rather than vaporization: the treatment of choice for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1989;74:1658.
  • 31
    Cinel A, Oselladore M, Insacco E, Minucci D. The accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1990;11:4337.
  • 32
    Skehan M, Soutter WP, Lim K, Krausz T, Pryse-Davies J. Reliability of colposcopy and directed punch biopsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:81116.
  • 33
    Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposcopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:12736.
  • 34
    Chappatte OA, Byrne DL, Raju KS, Nayagam M, Kenney A. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern. Gynecol Oncol 1991;43:4650.
  • 35
    Howe DT, Vincenti AC. Is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) more accurate than colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:58891.
  • 36
    Vergote IB, Makar AP, Kjorstad KE. Laser excision of the transformation zone as treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with satisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol 1992;44:2359.
  • 37
    Bonardi R, Cecchini S, Grazzini G, Ciatto S. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the transformation zone and colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:10202.
  • 38
    Ang MS, Kaufman RH, Adam E, Riddle G, Irwin JF, Reeves KO, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone. Comparison of histologic findings. J Reprod Med 1995;40:16770.
  • 39
    Powell B. The use of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in an outpatient setting. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;36:33846.
  • 40
    Srisomboon J, Tangchaitrong CA, Bhusawang Y, Chairatana A. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. J Med Assoc Thai 1996;79:4238.
  • 41
    Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Philippe E. An analysis of the factors involved in the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:46873.
  • 42
    Fung HY, Cheung LP, Rogers MS, To KF. The treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: when could we ‘see and loop’. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;72:199204.
  • 43
    Heatley MK, Bury JP. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix. Cytopathology 1998;9:939.
  • 44
    Ihonor AO, Cheung WY, Freites ON. A comparative study of the assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women having large loop excision of the transformation zone. J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;19:16971.
  • 45
    Barker B, Garcia F, Lozevski J, Warner J, Hatch K. The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncol 2001;82:226.
  • 46
    Diakomanolis E, Haidopoulos D, Chatzipapas I, Rodolakis A, Stefanidis K, Markaki S. Negative cone biopsies. A reappraisal. J Reprod Med 2003;48:61721.
  • 47
    Fambrini M, Penna C, Fallani MG, Marchionni M. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of biopsy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82:21920.
  • 48
    Weigl G, Pokieser W, Schuller B, Weigert M, Ulrich W, Sevelda P, et al. Investigation of 208 consecutive cases of cervical cone biopsies with regard to indication, negative samples and quality control. Acta Cytol 2006;50:18590.
  • 49
    Boonlikit S, Asavapiriyanont S, Junghuttakarnsatit P, Tuipae S, Supakarapongkul W. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and large loop excision of the transformation zone and influence of age on the outcome. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89:299305.
  • 50
    Byrom J, Douce G, Jones PW, Tucker H, Millinship J, Dhar K, et al. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16:2536.
  • 51
    Kjellberg L, Tavelin B. ‘See and treat’ regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:11404.
  • 52
    Castle PE, Stoler MH, Solomon D, Schiffman M. The relationship of community biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to the quality control pathology-reviewed diagnoses: an ALTS report. Am J Clin Pathol 2007;127:80515.
  • 53
    Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, Georgoulopoulos A, Ciresa-Koenig A, Volgger B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:321 e16.
  • 54
    Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011;118:103141.
  • 55
    Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, Dippery S, Gardner S, Kubota J, et al. Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:26472.
  • 56
    Nam K, Chung S, Kwak J, Cha S, Kim J, Jeon S, et al. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010;14:34651.
  • 57
    Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, et al. Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:4304.
  • 58
    TOMBOLA. Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;339:b2546.
  • 59
    Soutter WP, Diakomanolis E, Lyons D, Ghaem-Maghami S, Ajala T, Haidopoulos D, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:181420.
  • 60
    Louwers J, Zaal A, Kocken M, Ter Harmsel W, Graziosi G, Spruijt J, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG 2011;118:30918.