Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation
Article first published online: 12 OCT 2012
© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Volume 119, Issue 13, pages 1657–1664, December 2012
How to Cite
Uccella, S., Cromi, A., Colombo, G., Agosti, M., Bogani, G., Casarin, J. and Ghezzi, F. (2012), Prediction of fetal base excess values at birth using an algorithm to interpret fetal heart rate tracings: a retrospective validation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119: 1657–1664. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03511.x
- Issue published online: 12 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 12 OCT 2012
- Accepted 11 August 2012. Published Online 16 October 2012.
- 5American College of Obstetricians, Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 106.: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation and general clinical principles. Obstet Gynecol2009;114:192–202.
- 6Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2006;3:CD006066., , .
- 15Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical effectiveness support unit. Evidence-based Clinical guideline no. 8: the use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
- 18Statistics in medicine. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 138–43, 175-9..
- 21Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29:S3–56., , .