• 1
    Department of Health. Information for Health. 1998. Available from: (accessed 14 April 2008).
  • 2
    Brennan, S. The NHS IT Project: The Biggest Computer Programme in the World ... Ever! Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, 2005.
  • 3
    Informing Healthcare. Website. Available from: (accessed 19 February 2008).
  • 4
    eHealth for NHS Scotland. Website. Available from: (accessed 19 February 2008).
  • 5
    Wanless, D. Securing Our Future Health: Taking A Long-Term View. London: HM Treasury, 2002. Available from: (accessed 3 October 2007).
  • 6
    Wanless, D. Our Future Health Secured? A Review of NHS Funding and Performance. London: King's Fund, 2007. Available from: (accessed 3 October 2007).
  • 7
    Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2006.
  • 8
    Medix. Medix UK plc survey (Q850) of doctors’ views about the National Programme for IT (NPfIT)—January 2006. 2006. Available from: a aNPfIT_final_report.doc (accessed 16 January 2006).
  • 9
    Royal College of Nursing. Survey results into the information needs of nurses and other health professionals. 2005. Available from: (accessed 16 January 2006).
  • 10
    Davis, F. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 1993, 38, 47587.
  • 11
    Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. A theoretical extension to the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000, 46, 186204.
  • 12
    Dixon, D. R. & Dixon, B. J. Adoption of information technology enabled innovations by primary care physicians. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1994, 18, 6314.
  • 13
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27, 42578.
  • 14
    Stronge, J. H. & Brodt, A. Assessment of nurses’ attitudes toward computerization. Computers in Nursing 1985, 3, 1548.
  • 15
    Sultana, N. Nurses attitudes towards computerisation in clinical practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1990, 15, 696702.
  • 16
    McBride, S. & Nagle, L. Attitudes towards computers: a test of construct validity. Computers in Nursing 1996, 14, 16470.
  • 17
    Schumacher, K., Brodnik, M., Sachs, L. & Schiller, M. Therapists anxiety and attitudes towards computerised documentation in the clinical setting. Journal of Allied Health 1997, 26, 1518.
  • 18
    Scarpa, R. & Smeltzer, S. Attitudes of nurses towards computerisation: a replication. Computers in Nursing 1992, 10, 7280.
  • 19
    Schwirian, P., Malone, J., Stone, V., Nunley, B. & Fransico, T. Computers in nursing practice: a comparison on the attitudes of nurses and nursing students. Computers in Nursing 1989, 7, 16877.
  • 20
    Pagliari, C. Literature review and conceptual map of the area of E-health. 2004, SDO/60/2003. Available from: (accessed 14 April 2008).
  • 21
    Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett. C., Holenstein, F. & Sterne, J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews ? Empirical Study. Health Technology Assessment 2003, 7, 175.
  • 22
    RefworksTM Bibliographic management software. Available from:
  • 23
    Khan, K. S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Snowden, A. J. & Kleijen, J. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness. CRD Report Number 4 (2nd Edition) 2001. Available from: (accessed 14 April 2008).
  • 24
    Derup, J. Experience and attitudes towards information technology among first-year medical students in Denmark: longitudinal questionnaire survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004, 6, e10. Available from: (accessed 14 April 2008).
  • 25
    Junger, A. Evaluation of the suitability of a patient data management system for ICUs on a general ward. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001, 64, 5766.
  • 26
    Avinson, D. E. & Fitzgerald, G. Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 2nd edn. London: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
  • 27
    Gohlinghorst, S., Weir, C., Nutt, T. & McCarthy, C. Computer needs assessment based on nursing tasks. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 2959.
  • 28
    Chiasson, M. W. & Lovato, C. Y. The health planning context and its effect on a user's perceptions of software usefulness. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2000, 91, 2258.
  • 29
    Weir, C., Crockett, R., Gohlinghorst, S. & McCarthy, C. Does user satisfaction relate to adoption behaviour?: an exploratory analysis using CPRS implementation. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 913917.
  • 30
    Adams, W. G., Mann, A. M. & Bauchner, H. Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban paediatric primary care. Pediatrics 2003, 111, 62632.
  • 31
    Trivedi, M. H., Kern, J. K., Marcee, A., Grannemann, B., Kleiber, B., Bettinger, T., Altshuler, K. Z. & McClelland, A. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods of Information in Medicine 2002, 41, 43542.
  • 32
    Beuscart-Zephir, M. Integrating users’ activity modelling in the design and assessment of hospital electronic patient records: the example of anaesthesia. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001, 64, 15771.
  • 33
    Collins, P. W., Bolton-Maggs, P., Stephenson, D., Jenkins, B., Loran, C. & Winter, M. Pilot study of an Internet-based electronic patient treatment record and communication system for haemophilia, Haemophilia 2000, 9, 28591.
  • 34
    Carroll, A. E. & Christakis, D. A. Pediatricians’ use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics 2004, 113, 23842.
  • 35
    Lee, T. Nurses’ concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2005, 14, 34453.
  • 36
    Fischer, S., Lapinsky, S. E., Weshler, J., Howard, F., Rotstein, L. E., Cohen, Z. & Stewart, T. E. Surgical procedure logging with use of a hand-held computer. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2002, 45, 34550.
  • 37
    McAlearney, A. S., Schweikhart, S. B. & Medow, M. A. Doctors’ experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2004, 328, 1162.
  • 38
    Ammenwerth, E., Mansmann, U., Iller, C. & Eichstadter, R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003, 10, 6984.
  • 39
    Liu, J., Pothiban, L., Lu, Z. & Khamphonsiri, T. Computer knowledge, attitudes, and skills of nurses in People's Hospital of Beijing Medical University. Computers in Nursing 2000, 18, 197206.
  • 40
    Dixon, D. R. & Stewart, M. Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 1859.
  • 41
    Moody, L. E., Slocumb, E., Berg, B. & Jackson, D. Electronic records documentation in nursing. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN 2004, 22, 33744.
  • 42
    Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell, R. M. Jr & Thakker, N. R. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? Journal of Family Practice 2002, 51, 63641.
  • 43
    Balter, O. 2002 A longitudinal study of attitude changes in a medical service organisation after an e-mail introduction. Interacting with Computers 2000, 14, 50319.
  • 44
    Rosenbloom, S. T., Talbert, D. & Aronsky, D. Clinicians’ perceptions of clinical decision support integrated into computerized provider order entry. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004, 73, 43341.
  • 45
    Urkin, J., Goldfrab, D. & Weintraub, D. 2003 Introduction of computerized medical records. A survey of primary physicians. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health 2002, 15, 15360.
  • 46
    Rodriguez, N. J., Murillo, V., Borges, J. A., Ortiz, J. & Sands, D. Z. A usability study of physicians’ interaction with a paper-based patient record system and a graphical-based electronic patient record system. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. McLean, Virginia, April 28–29 2004, pp. 66771.
  • 47
    Apkon, M & Singhaviranon, P. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine 2001, 27, 12230.
  • 48
    Gadd, C. & Penrod, L. Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR. A longitudinal multi-practice study. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Washington, DC, November 3–7, 2001, pp. 1948.
  • 49
    Kleiner, K. D., Akers, R., Burke, B. L. & Werner, E. J. Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2002, 109, 7404.
  • 50
    Leung, G. M., Yu, P. L., Wong, I. O., Johnston, J. M. & Tin, K. Y. Incentives and barriers that influence clinical computerization in Hong Kong: a population-based physician survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003, 10, 20112.
  • 51
    Lee, F. W. Adoption of electronic medical records as a technology innovation for ambulatory care at the medical university of South Carolina. Topics in Health Information Management 2000, 21, 120.
  • 52
    Porteous, T., Bond, C., Robertson, R., Hannaford, P. & Rieter, E. Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists. British Journal of General Practice 2003, 53, 2049.
  • 53
    Hersh, W. R., Crabtree, M. K., Hickam, D. H., Sacherek, L., Rose, L. & Friedman, C. P. Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 2000, 88, 32331.
  • 54
    Ash, J., Gorman, P. N., Lavelle, M. & Lyman, J. Multiple perspectives on Physician Order Entry. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 2731.
  • 55
    Chan, T., De Lusignan, S. & Brew, S. Overcoming the barriers to using information systems. Nursing Times 2004, 100, 446.
  • 56
    Darr, A., Harrison, M. I., Shakked, L. & Shalom, N. Physicians’ and nurses’ reactions to electronic medical records. Journal of Health and Management 2003, 17, 34959.
  • 57
    Jacko, J. A., Sears, A. & Sorensen, S. J. Framework for usability: healthcare professionals and the Internet. Ergonomics 2001, 44, 9891007.
  • 58
    Kouri, P., Turunen, H. & Palomäki, T. Maternity clinic on the net service and its introduction into practice: experiences of maternity-care professionals. Midwifery 2005, 21, 17789.
  • 59
    Bauer, B. A., Lee, M., Bergstrom, L., Wahner-Roedler, D. L., Bundrick, J., Litin, S., Hoffer, E., Kim, R. J., Famiglietti, K., Barnett, G. O. & Elkin, P. L. Internal medicine resident satisfaction with a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain) introduced on a teaching hospital service. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. San Antonio, Texas, November 9–13, 2002, pp. 315.
  • 60
    Rosseau, N., McColl, E., Newton, J., Grimshaw, J. & Eccles, M. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. British Medical Journal 2003, 326, 31421.
  • 61
    Polhamus, B., Farel, A. & Trester, A. Enhancing technology skills of maternal and child health professionals. Maternal Children Health Journal 2000, 4, 2715.
  • 62
    Embi, P. J., Yackel, T. R., Logan, J. R., Bowen, J. L., Cooney, T. G. & Gorman, P. N. Impacts of computerization of physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004, 11, 3009.
  • 63
    Westerlund, L. O., Handl, W. H., Marklund, B. R. & Allebeck, P. Pharmacy practitioners’ views on computerized documentation of drug-related problems. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003, 37, 35460.
  • 64
    Haluck, R. S., Marshall, R. L., Krummel, T. M. & Melkonian, M. G. Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgery 2001, 193, 6605.
  • 65
    Sery-Ble, O. R., Taffe, E. R., Clarke, A. W. & Dorman, T. Use of and satisfaction with a browser-based nurse teaching tool in a surgical intensive care unit. Computers in Nursing 2001, 19, 826.
  • 66
    Stricklin, M. L., Bierer, S. B. & Struk, C. Home care nurses’ attitudes toward computers: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Strong and Brodt instrument. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN 2003, 21, 10311.
  • 67
    Doolan, D. F., Bates, D. W. & James, B. C. The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced US sites. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003, 10, 94107.
  • 68
    Pare, G. 2002 Implementing clinical information systems: a multiple-case study within a US hospital. Health Services Management Research 2000, 15, 7192.
  • 69
    Chismar, W. G. & Wiley-Patton, S. Test of the technology acceptance model for the Internet in pediatrics. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. San Antonio, Texas, November 9–13, 2002, pp. 1559.
  • 70
    Timmons, S. Nurses resisting information technology. Nursing Inquiry 2003, 10, 25769.
  • 71
    Johnston, J. M., Leung, G. M., Wong, J. F., Ho, L. M. & Fielding, R. Physicians’ attitudes towards the computerization of clinical practice in Hong Kong: a population study. International Journal of Medical Information 2002, 65, 419.
  • 72
    Lai, T. Y. Y., Leung, G. M., Wong, I. O. L. & Johnston, J. M. Do doctors act on their self-reported intention to computerize? A follow-up population-based survey in Hong Kong. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004, 73, 41531.
  • 73
    Moffat, M. O., Moffat, K. J. & Cano, V. General practitioners and the Internet—a questionnaire survey of Internet connectivity and use in Lothian. Health Bulletin (Edinburgh) 2001, 59, 1206.
  • 74
    Araujo, M. T., Paiva, T., Jesuino, J. C. & Magalhaes, M. General practitioners and neurotelemedicine. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2000, 78, 4567.
  • 75
    Temple, N., Kemp, W. & Benson, W. Computer technology and student preferences in a nutrition course: a case study. The Open University 2006, 21, 717.
  • 76
    Yousem, D. M. & Beauchamp, N. J. 2000 Clinical input into designing a PACS. Journal of Digital Imaging 2003, 13, 1924.
  • 77
    Mast, C. G., Caruso, M. A., Gadd, C. S. & Lowe, H. J. Evaluation of a filmless radiology pilot—a preliminary report. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium . Washington, DC, November 3–7, 2001, pp. 4437.
  • 78
    Lehoux, P., Sicotte, C., Denis, J. L., Berg, M. & Lacroix, A. The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians’ clinical routines? Social Science and Medicine 2002, 54, 889904.
  • 79
    Demartines, N., Freiermuth, O., Mutter, D., Heberer, M. & Harder, F. Knowledge and acceptance of telemedicine in surgery: a survey. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2000, 6, 12531.
  • 80
    Bartoloni, J. A. Use of direct digital radiography at remote dental facilities. Military Medicine 2000, 165, 9258.
  • 81
    Gattas, M. R., MacMillan, J. C., Meinecke, I., Loane, M. & Wootton, R. Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2001, 7, 6870.
  • 82
    Crowley, R., Gadd, C. S., Naus, G., Becich, M. & Lowe, H. J. Defining the role of anatomic pathology images in the multimedia electronic medical record—a preliminary report. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium.Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 1615.
  • 83
    Rydmark, M., Kling-Petersen, T., Pascher, R. & Philip, F. 3D visualization and stereographic techniques for medical research and education. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2001, 81, 4349.
  • 84
    Krall, M. A. & Sittig, D. F. 2002 Clinician's assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium.San Antonio, Texas, November 9–13, 2002, pp. 4004.
  • 85
    May, C. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Social Science and Medicine 2001, 52, 1889901.
  • 86
    Seckman, C. A., Romano, C. A. & Marden, S. Evaluation of clinician response to wireless technology. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Washington, DC, November 3–7, 2001, pp. 6126.
  • 87
    Anderson, J. G. Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2002, 32, 17993.
  • 88
    Campbell, J. D., Harris, K. D. & Hodge, R. Introducing telemedicine technology to rural physicians and settings. Journal of Family Practice 2001, 50, 41924.
  • 89
    Larcher, B., Berloffa, F., Demichelis, F., Eccher, C., Favaretti, C., Galvagni, M., Martini, G., Sboner, A., Graiff, A. & Forti, S. An evaluation of the use of and user satisfaction with a teleconsultation system in oncology practice. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2002, 8, 2830.
  • 90
    Travers, D. A. & Downs, S. M. Comparing user acceptance of a computer system in two pediatric offices: a qualitative study. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. Los Angeles, CA, November 2000, pp. 8537.
  • 91
    Lee, T. T., Yeh, C. H. & Ho, L. H. 2002 Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 39, 617.
  • 92
    Liederman, E. M. & Morefield, C. S. Web messaging: a new tool for patient–physician communication. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003, 10, 26070.
  • 93
    Schubart, J. R. & Einbinder, J. S. 2000 Evaluation of a data warehouse in an academic health sciences center. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001, 60, 31933.
  • 94
    Walter, G., Cleary, M. & Rey, J. M. Patterns of use, attitudes and expectations of mental health staff regarding computers. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 2000, 20, 203.
  • 95
    Zdanuk, S., Gimpel, J., Uhanova, J., Kaita, K. D. E. & Minuk, G. Y. The impact of medical informatics on the confidence of rural physicians caring for patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infections. Family Practice 2001, 18, 6024.
  • 96
    Hancock, H., Emden, C., Schubert, S. & Haller, A. They were different and few: an Australian study of midwives’ attitudes to research and computerised research findings. Journal of Australian College of Midwives 2000, 13, 713.
  • 97
    Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. London: Simon & Schuster International, 2003.
  • 98
    Dillon, T. W., Blankenship, R. & Crews, T. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN 2005, 23, 13945.
  • 99
    Newton, C. A study of nurses’ attitudes and quality of documents in computer care planning. Nursing Standard 1995, 9, 359.
  • 100
    Lee, T. Nurses’ experience using a nursing information system: early stages of technology implementation. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN 2007, 25, 294300.