SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Weightman, A. L. & Williamson, J. The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: a systematic review. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2005, 22, 425.
  • 2
    NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, National Library for Health. National Service Framework for Quality Improvement for NHS funded knowledge services in England, Version 1.1, February 2008. Accessible at: http://www.library.nhs.uk/aboutnlh/review
  • 3
    Crawford, J., Fiander, W. & Payne, P. Counting on making a difference: assessing our impact. Vine 2004, 34, 17683.
  • 4
    Markless, S. & Streatfield, D. Evaluating the Impact of Your Library. London: Facet Publishing; 2006.
  • 5
    Crawford, J. The use of electronic information services and information literacy: a Glasgow Caledonian University study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2006, 38, 3344.
  • 6
    Laser Foundation. Libraries Impact Project, conducted by PwC, LLP. London: Laser Foundation; 2005.
  • 7
    Urquhart, C. Assessing impact—let us count the ways? Library + Information Update 2005, 4(2), 268.
  • 8
    Cuddy, T. M. Value of hospital libraries: the Fuld Campus study. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2005, 93, 4469.
  • 9
    Abels, E. G., Cogdill, K. W. & Zach, L. Identifying and communicating the contributions of library and information services in hospitals and academic health science centers. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2004, 92, 4653.
  • 10
    Andrews, J. The use of critical incident research technique in an academic library. Library and Information Research News 1991, 14(50), 227.
  • 11
    Fisher, S. & Oulton, T. The critical incident technique in library and information management research. Education for Information 1999, 17, 11325.
  • 12
    Kunz, W., Rittel, H. W. J. & Schwuchow, W. Methods of Analysis and Evaluation of Information Needs: A Critical Review. Munich: Verlag Dokumentation; 1977.
  • 13
    Urquhart, C., Light, A., Urquhart, C., Thomas, R., Barker, A., Yeoman, A., Cooper, J., Armstrong, C., Fenton, R., Lonsdale, R. & Spink, S. Critical incident technique and explicitation interviewing in studies of information behavior. Library & Information Science Research 2003, 5, 6388.
  • 14
    Wilson, S. R., Starr-Schneidkraut, N. & Cooper, M. D. National Library of Medicine Office of Health Information Programes Development (2001). Use of the Critical Incident Technique to Evaluate the Impact of Medline [online] Bethesda, National Library of Medicine, September 1989 (original publication), updated 2001. Accessible at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20040721/od/ope/cit.html
  • 15
    Urquhart, C., Spink, S., Thomas, R. & Weightman, A. Developing a Toolkit for Assessing the Impact of Health Library Services on Patient Care. Report to LKDN (Libraries and Knowledge Development Network). Aberystwyth: Department of Information Studies, 2007. Accessible at: http://cadair.aber.ac.uk
  • 16
    Urquhart, C. & Hepworth, J. B. The Value to Clinical Decision Making of Information Supplied by NHS Library and Information Services. British Library R & D report 6205. Aberystwyth: Department of Information (and Library) Studies, 1995. Accessible at: http://users.aber.ack/cju
  • 17
    Urquhart, C. J. & Hepworth, J. B. Comparing and using assessments of the value of information to clinical decision making. Bulletin of the of the Medical Library Association 1996, 84, 4829.
  • 18
    Davies, R., Urquhart, C., Smith, J., Massiter, C. & Hepworth, J. B. Establishing the Value of Information to Nursing Continuing Education: Report of the EVINCE Project. BL RIC report 44. Aberystwyth: Department of Information (and Library) Studies, 1997. Accessible at: http://users.aber.auk/cju
  • 19
    Urquhart, C., Yeoman, A., Cooper, J. & Wailoo, A. NeLH Pilot Evaluation Project. Final Report to NHS Information Authority, NeLH. Aberystwyth: Department of Information Studies, Aberystwyth University, 2001. Accessible at: http://Users Er Ac Uk/Cju
  • 20
    Urquhart, C., Durbin, J. & Turner, J. The North Wales Clinical Librarian Project. Final Project Report. Aberystwyth: Department of Information Studies, 2005. Accessible at: http://cadair.aber.ac.uk, http://hdl.handle.net/2160/195
  • 21
    Publicover, M., Giles, G., Bolton, B., Shemilt, C. & Urquhart, C. Listening to our clinical colleagues: how are they finding their evidence to support Trust clinical governance? Health Information and Libraries Journal 2006, 23(Suppl. 1), 5761.
  • 22
    Weightman, A. L., Mann, M. K., Sander, L. & Turley, R. L. Health Evidence Bulletins Wales: Project Methodology 5. Cardiff: University of Wales College of Medicine, 2004. Accessible at: http://hebw.cf.ac.uk/projectmethod/title.htm
  • 23
    Michaelidou, N. & Dibb, H. Using email questionnaires for research: good practice in tackling non-response. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 2006, 14, 28996.
  • 24
    Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. & Oosterveld, P. Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Marketing Letters 2004, 15, 2136.
  • 25
    Kenyon, S., Pike, K., Jones, D., Taylor, D., Salt, A., Marlow, N. & Brocklehurst, P. The effect of a monetary incentive on return of a postal health and development questionnaire: a randomised trial. BMC Health Services Research 2005, 5, 55 (doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-55).
  • 26
    Doody, M. M., Sigurdson, A. S., Kampa, D., Chimes, K., Alexander, B. H., Ron, E., Tarone, R. E. & Linet, M. S. Randomized trial of financial incentives and delivery methods for improving response to a mailed questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003, 157, 64351.
  • 27
    Helgeson, J. G., Voss, K. E. & Perpening, W. D. Determinants of mail-survey response: survey design factors and respondent factors. Psychology & Marketing 2002, 19, 30328.
  • 28
    Newby, R., Watson, J. & Woodliff, D. SME Survey Methodology: response rates, data quality, and cost effectiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 28, 16372 (doi:10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00037.x).
  • 29
    Ryu, E., Couper, M. P. & Marans, R. W. Survey incentives: cash vs. in-kind; face-to-face vs. mail; response rate vs. nonresponse error. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2005, 18(1): 89106 (doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edho89).
  • 30
    Whiteman, M. K., Langenberg, P., Kjerulff, K., McCarter, R. & Flaws, J. A. A randomized trial of incentives to improve response rates to a mailed women's health questionnaire. Journal of Womens Health 2003, 12, 8218.
  • 31
    Cook, C., Heath, F. & Thompson, R. L. A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2000, 60, 82136.
  • 32
    Earp, S. & Hunter, A. Influences on Questionnaire Response Rate. Working Paper Series. no. 99/11. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Management School; 1999.
  • 33
    Roberts, L. M., Wilson, S., Roalfe, A. & Bridge, P. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys. BMC Health Services Research 2004, 4, 30.
  • 34
    Kalantar, J. S. & Talley, N. J. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a population based study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1999, 52, 111722.
  • 35
    Koloski, N. A., Talley, N. J., Boyce, P. M. & Morris-Yates, A. D. The effects of questionnaire length and lottery ticket inducement on the response rate in mail surveys. Psychology & Health 2001, 16, 6775.
  • 36
    Sharp, L., Cochran, C., Cotton, S. C., Gray, N. M. & Gallagher, M. E. on behalf of the TOMBOLA group. Enclosing a pen with a postal questionnaire can significantly increase the response rate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006, 59, 74754.
  • 37
    Clark, T. J., Khan, K. S. & Gupta, J. K. Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001, 55, 5956.
  • 38
    Bogen, K. The effect of questionnaire length on response rates—a review of the literature. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 1996: 10205.
  • 39
    Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., Reeves, R., Bruster, S. & Richards, N. Properties of the Picker Patient Experience questionnaire in a randomized controlled trial of long versus short form survey instruments. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2003, 25, 197201.
  • 40
    Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P. & Frost, C. Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter? Controlled Clinical Trials 2004, 25, 3152.
  • 41
    Smith, R., Olah, D., Hansen, B. & Cumbo, D. The effect of questionnaire length on participants response rate: a case study in the US cabinet industry. Forest Products Journal 2003, 53(11–12), 336.
  • 42
    Lund, E. & Gram, I. T. Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1998, 26, 15460.
  • 43
    Dillman, D. A., Sinclair, M. D. & Clark, J. R. Effects of questionnaire length, respondent-friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 1993, 57, 289304.
  • 44
    Burchell, B. & Marsh, C. The effect of questionnaire length on survey response. Quality & Quantity 1992, 26, 23344.
  • 45
    White, M. B. & Chambers, K. M. Type of cover letter and questionnaire color. Do they influence the response rate in survey research with marriage and family therapists? Family Therapy 1997, 24, 1924.
  • 46
    Buttle, F. & Thomas, G. Questionnaire colour and mail survey response rate. Journal of the Market Research Society 1997, 39, 6256.
  • 47
    Etter, J. F., Cucherat, M. & Perneger, T. V. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys—a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2002, 25, 18599.
  • 48
    Gendall, P. Can you judge a questionnaire by its cover? The effect of questionnaire cover design on mail survey response. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2005, 17, 34661.
  • 49
    Kalafatis, S. P. & Blankson, C. An investigation into the effect of questionnaire identification numbers in consumer mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society 1996, 38, 27784.
  • 50
    McKee, D. O. The effect of using a questionnaire identification code and message about non response follow-up plans on mail survey response characteristics. Journal of the Market Research Society 1992, 34, 17991.
  • 51
    Scott, P. & Edwards, P. Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6, 111 (doi. http://biomedcentral.com/1472-693/6/111).
  • 52
    Byrom, J. & Bennison, D. The effect of personalisation on mailed questionnaire response rates. International Journal of Market Research 2000, 42, 3578.
  • 53
    Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D. & Levine, R. A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 2004, 68, 94101.
  • 54
    Kiernan, N. E., Kiernan, M., Oyler, M. A. & Gilles, C. Is a Web survey as effective as a mail survey? A field experiment among computer users. American Journal of Evaluation 2005, 26, 24552.
  • 55
    Cobanoglou, C., Warde, B. & Moreo, P. J. A comparison of mail, fax, and Web-based survey methods. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (SRMS) 2000. Accessible at: http://www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/proceedings/papers/2000_065.pdf
  • 56
    Barclay, S., Todd, C., Finlay, I., Grande, G. & Wyatt, P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Family Practice 2002, 19, 10511.
  • 57
    Roberts, H., Pearson, J. C. & Dengler, R. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1993, 47, 3345.
  • 58
    Nakash, R. A., Hutton, J. L., Jørstad-Stein, E. C., Gates, S. & Lamb, S. E. Maximising response to postal questionnaires—a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006, 6, 5 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5).
  • 59
    Sheridan, J. & Strang, J. Late responders and non- responders to a postal survey questionnaire: analysis of potential further response and non-reponse bias. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice 1998, 7, 1705.
  • 60
    Tan, R. T. & Burke, F. J. T. Response rates to questionnaires mailed to dentists. A review of 77 publications. International Dental Journal 1997, 47, 34954.
  • 61
    Locker, D. D. Telephone prompts improve questionnaire response rates. Evidence Based Dentistry 2000, 2, 70.
  • 62
    Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Clarke, M., DiGuiseppi, C., Pratap, S. & Wentz, R. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. British Medical Journal 2002, 324, 118392.
  • 63
    Association of Research Libraries. About LibQUAL+. Accessible at: http://www.libqual.org/About/index.cfm
  • 64
    Riley, L. Personal Communication from Linda Riley to Alison Weightman. E-mail: dated 3 October 2006.
  • 65
    Gluck, J. C., Hassig, R. A., Balogh, L., Bandy, M., Donaldson, J. D., Kronenfeld, M. R., Lindner, K. L., Murray, K., Petersen, J. & Rand, D. C. Standards for hospital libraries 2002. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2002 90, 46572. Accessible at: http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=128964
  • 66
    Medical Library Association. MLA Benchmarking Network Resources, 2001–02 Survey. Accessible at: http://www.mlanet.org/resources/benchmark
  • 67
    Creative Research Systems. Accessible at: http://www.surveystem.com/sscalc.htm