SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Accessible at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 2
    Royle, P. & Waugh, N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technology Assessment 2003, 7(34):iii, ixx, 1–51
  • 3
    Brettle, A. J., Long, A. F., Grant, M. J. & Greenhalgh, J. Searching for information on outcomes: do you need to be comprehensive? Quality in Health Care 1998, 7, 163167.
  • 4
    Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
  • 5
    Stevinson, C. & Lawlor, D. A. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value of diminishing returns? Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2004, 12, 228232.
  • 6
    Brettle, A. J. & Long, A. F. Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 2001, 89, 353362.
  • 7
    Grayson, L. & Gomersall, A. A difficult business: finding the evidence for social science reviews, working paper 19. London, UK: Economic and Social Research Council, UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, 2003.
  • 8
    McDonald, S., Taylor, L. & Adams, C. Searching the right database: a comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Libraries Review 1999, 16, 151156.
  • 9
    Savoie, I., Helmer, D., Green, C. J. & Kazanjiian, A. Reducing bias through extended systematic review search. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003, 19, 168178.
  • 10
    Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S. & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive pearl growing. A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 2006, 41, 567582.
  • 11
    Lain, D. & Aston, J. Literature Review of Evidence on e-Learning in the Workplace. IES Occasional Paper, 2005. Accessible at: http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pdflibrary/01580.pdf (accessed 25 May 2007).
  • 12
    Atkins, C. & Sampson, J. Critical appraisal guidelines for single case study research. Proceedings of ECIS 2002, the Xth European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, 6–8 June, 2002.
  • 13
    Boynton, P. Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal 2004, 328, 1312.
  • 14
    Kmet, L. M., Lee, R. C. & Cook, L. S. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, 2004. Accessible at: http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA-FR13.pdf.
  • 15
    Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S. & Smith, J. A. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2004, 13, 223225.
  • 16
    Golder, S., Mason, A. & Spilsbury, K. Systematic searches for the effectiveness of respite care. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2008, 96, 147152.
  • 17
    McNally, R. & Alborz, A. Developing methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 1. Identifying the literature. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2004, 21, 182192.
  • 18
    Ogilvie, D., Hamilton, V., Egan, M. & Petticrew, M. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions. 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005, 59, 804808.
  • 19
    Matthews, E. J., Edwards, A. G. K., Barker, J., Bloor, M., Covey, J., Hood, K., Pill, R., Russell, I., Stott, N. & Wilkinson, C. Efficient literature searching in diffuse topics: lessons from a systematic review of research on communicating risk to patients in primary care. Health Libraries Review 1999, 16, 112120.
  • 20
    Haafkens, J., Moerman, C., Schuring, M. & Van Dijk, F. Searching bibliographic databases for literature on chronic disease and work participation. Occupational Medicine 2006, 56, 3945.
  • 21
    Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F. & Sterne, J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technology Assessment, 2003, 7(1), 176.