SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ambrosio E., Goldberg S. R. and Elmer G. I. (1995) Behavior genetic investigations of the relationship between spontaneous locomotor activity and the acquisition of morphine self-administration behavior. Behav. Pharm. 6, 229237.
  • Anderson K. G. and Elcoro M. (2007) Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Behav. Process. 74, 311318.
  • Anderson K. G. and Woolverton W. L. (2005) Effects of clomipramina on self-control choice in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 80, 387393.
  • Beitner-Johnson D., Guitart X. and Nestler E. J. (1991) Dopaminergic brain reward regions of Lewis and Fischer rats display different levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and other morphine – and cocaine-regulated phosphoproteins. Brain Res. 561, 147150.
  • Brodkin E. S., Carlezon W. A., Haile C. N., Kosten T. A., Heninger G. R. and Nestler E. J. (1998) Genetical analysis of behavioral, neuroendocrine, and biochemical parameters in inbred rodents: initial studies in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats and in A/J and C57BL/6 J mice. Brain Res. 805, 5568.
  • Brower V. G., Fu Y., Matta S. G. and Sharp B. M. (2002) Rat strain differences in nicotine self-administration using an unlimited access paradigm. Brain Res. 930, 1220.
  • Cadoni C. and Di Chiara G. (1999) Reciprocal changes in dopamine responsiveness in the nucleus accumbens shell and core and in the dorsal caudate-putamen in rats sensitized to morphine. Neuroscience 90, 447455.
  • Cadoni C. and Di Chiara G. (2000) Differential changes in accumbens shell and core dopamine in behavioral sensitization to nicotine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 387, R23R25.
  • Cadoni C., Solinas M. and Di Chiara G. (2000) Psychostimulant sensitization : differential changes in accumbal shell and core dopamine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 388, 6976.
  • Cadoni C., Solinas M., Valentini V. and Di Chiara G. (2003) Selective psychostimulant sensitization by food restriction: differential changes in accumbens shell and core dopamine. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 23262334.
  • Camp D. M., Browman K. E. and Robinson T. E. (1994) The effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on motor behavior and extracellular dopamine in the ventral stiatum of Lewis versus Fischer 344 rats. Brain Res. 668, 180193.
  • Chiueh C. C. and Moore K. E. (1975) Blockade by reserpine of methylphenidate-induced release of brain dopamine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 193, 559563.
  • Corbit L. H., Muir J. L. and Balleine B. W. (2001) The role of the nucleus accumbens in instrumental conditioning: evidence of a functional dissociation between accumbens core and shell. J. Neurosci. 21, 32513260.
  • Crabbe J. C., Belknap J. K. and Buck K. J. (1994) Genetic Animal Models of Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Science 264, 17151723.
  • Davis C. M., Roma P. G., Dominguez J. M. and Riley A. L. (2007) Morphine-induced place conditioning in Fischer and Lewis rats: acquisition and dose-response in a fully biased procedure. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 86, 516523.
  • Di Chiara G. (2002) Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. Behav. Brain Res. 137, 75114.
  • Di Chiara G. and Bassareo V. (2007) Reward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn’t do. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 7, 6976.
  • Di Chiara G., Tanda G., Frau R. and Carboni E. (1993) On the preferential release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens by amphetamine: further evidence obtained by vertically implanted concentric dialysis probes. Psychopharmacology 112, 398402.
  • Di Chiara G., Bassareo V., Fenu S., De Luca M. A., Spina L., Cadoni C., Acquas E., Carboni E., Valentini V. and Lecca D. (2004) Dopamine and drug addiction: the nucleus accumbens shell connection. Neuropharmacol. 47, 227241.
  • Fenu S., Spina L., Rivas E., Longoni R. and Di Chiara G. (2006) Morphine-conditioned single-trial place preference: role of nucleus accumbens shell dopamine receptors in acquisition, but not expression. Psychopharmacology 187, 143153.
  • Fernandez F., Porras G., Mormède P., Spampinato U. and Chaouloff F. (2003) Effects of 3,4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine on locomotor activity and extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of Fisher 344 and Lewis rats. Neuroscience 335, 212216.
  • Flores G., Wood G. K., Barbeau D., Quirion R. and Srivastava L. K. (1998) Lewis and Fischer rats: a comparison of dopamine transporter and receptors levels. Brain Res. 814, 3440.
  • George F. R. and Goldberg S. R. (1989) Genetic approaches to the analysis of addiction processes. Trends Pharma. Sci. 10, 7883.
  • George F. R., Porrino L. J., Ritz M. C. and Goldberg S. R. (1991) Inbred rat strain comparisons indicate different sites of action for cocaine and amphetamine locomotor stimulant effects. Psychopharmacology 104, 457462.
  • Gosnell B. A. and Krahn D. D. (1993) Morphine-induced feeding: a comparison of the Lewis and Fischer344 inbred rat strains. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 44, 919924.
  • Grakalic I., Schindler C. W., Baumann M. H., Rice K. C. and Riley A. L. (2006) Effects of stress modulation on morphine-induced conditioned place preference and plasma corticosterone levels in Fischer, Lewis and Sprague-Dawley rat strains. Psychopharmacology 189, 277286.
  • Guitart X., Beitner-Johnson D., Marby D. W., Kosten T. A. and Nestler E. J. (1992) Fischer and Lewis rat strains differ in basal levels of neurofilament proteins and their regulation by chronic morphine in the mesolimbic dopamine system. Synapse 12, 242253.
  • Guitart X., Kogan J. H., Berhow M., Terwilliger R. Z., Aghajanian G. K. and Nestler E. J. (1993) Lewis and Fischer rat strains display differences in biochemical, electrophysiological and behavioral parameters: studies in the nucleus accumbens and locus coeruleus of drug naive and morphine-treated animals. Brain Res. 611, 717.
  • Haile C. N., Hiroi N., Nestler E. J. and Kosten T. A. (2001) Differential behavioral responses to cocaine are associated with dynamics of mesolimbic dopamine proteins in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Synapse 41, 179190.
  • Herradon G., Morales L. and Alguacil L. F. (2003) Differences of mu-opioid receptors between Lewis and F344 rats. Life Sci. 73, 15371542.
  • Horan B., Smith M., Gardner E. L., Lepore M. and Ashby C. R. (1997) (-)-Nicotine produces conditioned place preference in Lewis, but not Fischer 344 rats. Synapse 26, 9394.
  • Kendler K. S., Karkowsky L. M., Neale M. C. and Prescott C. A. (2000) Illicit psychoactive substance use, heavy use, abuse, and dependence in a US population-based sample of male twins. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57, 261269.
  • Kosten T. A. and Ambrosio E. (2002) HPA axis function and drug additive behaviors: insights from studies with Lewis and Fisher 344 inbred rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27, 3569.
  • Kosten T. A., Miserendino M. J. D., Chi S. and Nestler E. J. (1994) Fischer and Lewis rat strains show differential cocaine effects in conditioned place preference and behavioral sensitization but not in locomotor activity or conditioned taste aversion. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269, 137144.
  • Kosten T. A., Miserendino M. J. D., Haile C. N., DeCaprio J. L., Jatlow P. I. and Nestler E. J. (1997) Acquisition and maintenance of intravenous cocaine self-administration in Lewis and Fischer inbred rat strains. Brain Res. 778, 418429.
  • Kosten T. A., Zhang X. Y. and Haile C. N. (2007) Strain differences in maintenance of cocaine self-administration and their relationship to novelty activity responses. Behav. Neurosci. 121, 380388.
  • Lancellotti D., Bayer B. M., Glowa J. R., Houghtling R. A. and Riley A. L. (2001) Morphine-induced conditioned taste aversions in the LEW/N and F344/N rat strains. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68, 603610.
  • Lepore M., Liu X., Savage V., Matalon D. and Gardner E. L. (1996) Genetic differences in delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced facilitation of brain stimulation reward as measured by a rate-fequency curve-shift electrical brain stimulation paradigm in three different rat strains. Life Sci. 58, 365372.
  • Liang N. Y. and Rutledge C. O. (1982) Comparison of the release of [3H]dopamine from isolated corpus striatum by amphetamine, fenfluramine and unlabelled dopamine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 31, 983992.
  • Martin S., Manzanares J., Corchero J., Garcia-Lecumberri C., Crespo J. A., Fuentes J. A. and Ambrosio E. (1999) Differential basal proenkephalin gene expression in dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens, and vulnerability to morphine self-administration in Fisher 344 and Lewis rats. Brain Res. 821, 350355.
  • Martin S., Lyupina Y., Crespo J. A., Gonzalez B., Garcia-Lecumberri C. and Ambrosio E. (2003) Genetic differences in NMDA and D1 receptor levels, and operant responding for food and morphine in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Brain Res. 973, 205213.
  • Minabe Y., Emori K. and Ashby C. R. Jr (1995) Significant differences in the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons between male Fischer 344 (F344) and Lewis rats: an in vivo electrophysiological study. Life Sci. 56, 261267.
  • Mocsary Z. and Bradberry C. W. (1996) Effect of ethanol on extracellular dopamine in nucleus accumbens: comparison between Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains. Brain Res. 706, 194198.
  • Ortiz J., DeCaprio J. L., Kosten T. A. and Nestler E. J. (1995) Strain-selective effects of corticosterone on locomotor sensitization to cocaine and on levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and glucocorticoid receptor in the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience 67, 383397.
  • Paxinos G. and Watson C.. (1998) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th Edn, Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Raiteri M., Cerrito F., Cervoni A. M. and Levi G. (1979) Dopamine can be released by two mechanisms differentially affected by the dopamine transport inhibitor nomifensine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 208, 195202.
  • Salamone J. D., Cousins M. S. and Snyder B. J. (1997) Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21, 341359.
  • Sanchez-Cardoso P., Higuera-Matas A., Martin S., Del Olmo N., Miguens M., Garcia-Lecumberri C. and Ambrosio E. (2007) Modulation of the endogenous opioid system after morphine self-administration and durino its extinction. A study in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Neuropharmacol. 52, 931948.
  • Smith-Roe S. L. and Kelley A. E. (2000) Coincident activation of NMDA and dopamine D1-receptors within the nucleus accumbens core is required for appetitive instrumental learning. J. Neurosci. 20, 77377742.
  • Spina L., Fenu S., Longoni R., Rivas E. and Di Chiara G. (2006) Nicotine-conditioned single-trial place preference: selective role of nucleus accumbens shell dopamine D1 receptors in acquisition. Psychopharmacology 184, 447455.
  • Stöhr T., Wermeling D. S., Weiner I. and Feldon J. (1998) Rat strain differences in open-field behavior and the locomotor stimulating and rewarding effects of amphetamine. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 59, 799805.
  • Strecker R. E., Eberle W. F. and Ashby C. R. (1995) Extracellular dopamine and its metabolites in the nucleus accumbens of Fischer and Lewis rats: basal levels and cocaine-induced changes. Life Sci. 56, 135141.
  • Suzuki T., George F. R. and Meisch R. A. (1988a) Differential establishment and maintenance of oral ethanol reinforced behavior in Lewis and Fisher 344 inbred rat strains. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 245, 164170.
  • Suzuki T., Otani K., Koike Y. and Misawa M. (1988b) Genetic differences in preferences for morphine and codeine in Lewis and Fisher 344 inbred rat strains. Jpn. J. Pharm. 47, 425431.
  • Suzuki T., George F. R. and Meisch R. A. (1992) Etonitazene delivered orally serves as a reiforcer for Lewis but not Fisher 344 rats. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 42, 579586.
  • Tanda G. and Di Chiara G. (1998) A dopamine-mu1 opioid link in the rat ventral tegmentum shared by palatable food (Fonzies) and non-psychostimulant drugs of abuse. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 11791187.
  • Tanda G., Frau R. and Di Chiara G. (1996) Chronic desipramine and fluoxetine differentially affect extracellular dopamine in the rat prefrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology 127, 8387.
  • Tanda G., Pontieri F. E. and Di Chiara G. (1997) Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common mu1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science 276, 20482050.
  • Tsuang M. T., Bar J. L., Harley R. M. and Lyons M. J. (2001) The Harvard Twin Study of Substance Abuse: what we have learned. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 9, 267279.
  • Zahm D. S. (1999) Functional-anatomical implications of the nucleus accumbens core and shell subterritories. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 877, 113128.