Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Aiwu Cheng, LNS, GRC, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. E-mail: email@example.com
Notch is an integral membrane protein that functions as receptor for ligands such as jagged and delta that are associated with the surface of neighboring cells. Upon ligand binding, notch is proteolytically cleaved within its transmembrane domain by presenilin-1 (the enzymatic component of the γ-secretase complex) resulting in the release of a notch intracellular domain which translocates to the nucleus where it regulates gene expression. Notch signaling plays multiple roles in the development of the CNS including regulating neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation, survival, self-renewal and differentiation. Notch is also present in post-mitotic neurons in the adult CNS wherein its activation influences structural and functional plasticity including processes involved in learning and memory. Recent findings suggest that notch signaling in neurons, glia, and NSCs may be involved in pathological changes that occur in disorders such as stroke, Alzheimer’s disease and CNS tumors. Studies of animal models suggest the potential of agents that target notch signaling as therapeutic interventions for several different CNS disorders.
Notch proteins are cell surface transmembrane receptors that mediate multiple important cellular functions through cell–cell interactions. Four paralogs of the notch gene (notch 1–4) and five ligands (jagged 1 and 2; Delta 1, 2 and 3) have been identified in vertebrates (Ohishi et al. 2002). Notch-1 (commonly referred to as notch) has been widely investigated, while other notch’s have been studied minimally. Notch proteins contain extracellular EGF (epidermal growth factor) like repeats which interact with Delta, Serrate and Lag domain of ligands. Activation of notch upon ligand binding is accompanied by proteolytic cleavage of notch by presenilin-1/γ-secretase which releases an intracellular domain of notch (NICD) from the membrane tether. Upon release, the NICD translocates to the nucleus where it associates with the CBF1/RBPJk/Su(H)/Lag1 (CSL) family of DNA-binding proteins which represses or activates transcription via the recruitment of chromatin remodeling complexes containing histone deacetylase or histone acetylase proteins, respectively. NICD-CSL initiates transcriptional activation (Kramer 2000; Kopan 2002) through multiple mechanisms including: (i) recruitment of histone acetylases (HATs); (ii) conversion of CSL from a transcriptional repressor to a transcriptional activator by interacting with SKIP (ski-related protein) to dissociate SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor)/histone deacetyalse (HDAC); (iii) recruitment of Mastermind/Lag3 to activate additional targets. Most of the notch target genes encode transcription regulators, many of which are critical in CNS development such as brain lipid binding protein (Anthony et al. 2005) and tissue-specific basic helix-loop-helix gene families such as hairy enhancer of split (HES). Cell fate determination or other events influenced by notch signaling can also result from interaction with other molecular targets, such as NF-κB (Kramer 2000; Liu et al. 2003) or the RNA-binding protein musashi (Imai et al. 2001). An overview of the notch signaling pathway is illustrated in Fig. 1.
The notch signaling pathway is an intercellular signaling mechanism critical for organogenesis, regulating an array of cellular processes including stem cell self-renewal, cell fate determination, cellular differentiation and death. In the CNS, notch protein and ligands are not only present in the embryonic stages, but also continuously present in the adult nervous system (Presente et al. 2001). During the entire lifetime, from birth to death, notch is actively involved in dynamic changes in the cellular architecture and function of the nervous system. It controls neurogenesis, the growth of axons and dendrites, synaptic plasticity and ultimately neuronal death. The present article summarizes the roles of notch signaling in the CNS from the embryo through to adulthood, and also considers the involvement of notch signaling in CNS damage and repair.
Notch signaling in NSCs during CNS development
During embryonic development, neurons and glia of the mammalian cerebral cortex are generated from proliferating neuroepithelial cells in the telencephalic ventricular zone (VZ), a zone surrounding the lateral ventricle (The Boulder Committee 1970; Takahashi et al. 1995). In rodents, it occurs over a matter of a few days. Initially, there is a rapid expansion of NSCs within VZ by symmetric cell divisions, followed by asymmetric cell divisions sequentially generating neuronal and glial cells via differentiation (Temple 2001). The identity of NSCs also changes during this process from neuroepithelial cells within the VZ to radial glia which span the length of the entire cortex as it thickens during neurogenesis (Fishell and Kriegstein 2003; Merkle et al. 2004; Gotz and Barde 2005). In developing nervous system, the proliferation, differentiation and survival of NSC are the fundamental processes responsible for generating sufficient numbers of neurons required for the formation of neuronal circuits. The regulation of these developmental processes has a direct bearing on the cytoarchitecture, function and plasticity of the CNS. Within the embryonic VZ, there are a series of intrinsic and external regulators which are critical to ensure proper development of the telencephalon, and notch signaling represents one such mediator of cell–cell interactions. Although there are data demonstrating notch signaling in the adult NSC population, which persists in the subependymal zone of cerebral cortex and the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus, the majority of evidence for notch signaling in controlling NSC behavior comes from studies during embryonic neurogenesis.
The notch signaling pathway is a well-known regulator of many cellular processes essential to development: self-renewal, differentiation, and apoptosis (Artavanis-Tsakonas et al. 1999; Bray 2006). As the neighboring cell has the notch ligand and the target cell has the notch receptor, this signaling system could be used for lateral inhibition whereby notch signaling in one specific cell inhibits neighboring cells. While there are many examples of this in Drosophila, this mechanism has also been reported to regulate epidermal cells and their differentiated progeny in human skin (Lowell et al. 2000). In the developing CNS, notch signaling in NSC maintains those cells in a proliferating state (Zhong et al. 1997), whereas a protein called numb, which antagonizes notch, promotes cell cycle arrest and neuronal differentiation (Li et al. 2003). In this way, notch signaling controls NSC self-renewal, and cell fate specification. Accordingly, notch-deficient mice, and presenilin-1 knockout mice (in which notch signaling is prevented) exhibit profound abnormalities of brain development (Handler et al. 2000).
Notch, numb, and NSC cell division
While the role of notch in regulating cell division is not well understood, numb, an antagonist of notch signaling (Frise et al. 1996; Guo et al. 1996; Spana and Doe 1996) is a critical component of NSC division in a variety of species. First discovered to play a role in the Drosophila PNS (Uemura et al. 1989) with a similar function in the CNS (Spana and Doe 1995), numb preferentially segregates to one of the two spindle poles during cell division and ensures that the two daughter cells adopt different cell fates (Rhyu et al. 1994; Knoblich et al. 1995). The mammalian numb homologue has also been identified and is capable of rescuing the Drosophila mutation (Zhong et al. 1996). In the mammalian VZ, the orientation of the spindle may be indicative of cell fate (Chenn and McConnell 1995; Haydar et al. 2003). While this model has recently been amended to include the inheritance of a small part of the plasma membrane, termed the apical membrane (Kosodo et al. 2004), a cell dividing with a cleavage plane parallel to the ventricular wall will generate an basal daughter cell which will migrate away from the VZ and an apical daughter cell which will remain a stem cell (Chenn and McConnell 1995; Haydar et al. 2003). As first shown in the ferret (Chenn and McConnell 1995; Chenn 2005) cortex and later in the mouse (Zhong et al. 1996), numb localizes to the apical cell while notch localizes to the basal cell (Fig. 1), suggesting that numb inheritance is a requirement to remain a stem cell. Work in the mouse VZ was followed by a series of in vitro experiments analyzing NSC divisions using time lapse microscopy (Shen et al. 2002). In these experiments, consistent with the in vivo data, numb was asymmetrically distributed when the result of the NSC division was asymmetric and NSCs derived from numb KO mice underwent fewer asymmetric divisions (Shen et al. 2002). However, in NSCs derived from E13 mouse embryos (a period of embryonic neurogenesis in vivo), numb appeared to be asymmetrically distributed to the neuronal daughter cells and not to the NSC (Shen et al. 2002), as would be predicted from previous in vivo studies (Chenn and McConnell 1995; Zhong et al. 1996).
Notch and NSC behavior
Another role for notch signaling during CNS development is to promote NSC survival, self-renewal, and cell fate specification (neuronal or glial). Several studies have characterized members of the notch signaling pathway in the embryonic VZ. For example, in situ hybridization of the mouse neural tube showed high levels of notch1 and delta1 mRNA (Lindsell et al. 1996). Immunostaining of the VZ at E12 showed high levels of both notch-1 and notch-3 (Gaiano et al. 2000; Dang et al. 2006). Using a LacZ transgenic reporter mouse, high expression of delta 1 in the VZ of the forebrain at E10 was also reported (Beckers et al. 2000). Complementary immunostaining of the embryonic human VZ also displayed expression of notch-1, and weak expression of notch-3 as well as strong expression of delta-1 and sporadic expression of jagged-1 (Kostyszyn et al. 2004).
Notch signaling has been shown to be a critical regulator of the behavior of the stem cell population within the VZ (Fig. 1) as demonstrated by several different approaches. For example, Dll4 (delta like ligand 4) administration to NSCs derived from E13.5 mice in vitro increases their survival (Androutsellis-Theotokis et al. 2006), and NSCs differentiated from embryonic stem cells lacking RBPJk display a failure of NSC self-renewal (Hitoshi et al. 2002). In addition, intraventricular injection of notch ligands into the brains of adult rats increases the numbers of newly-generated precursor cells (Androutsellis-Theotokis et al. 2006). Interestingly, a recent study utilizing a tamoxifen inducible numb/numblike deletion in the adult mouse subependymal zone demonstrated the role of notch signaling in ventricular wall integrity and neuroblast survival (Kuo et al. 2006). Activation of either notch-1 or notch-3 in the embryonic forebrain results in increased numbers of cells with a radial glial phenotype (as illustrated in Fig. 1) (Gaiano et al. 2000; Dang et al. 2006). Recent re-characterization efforts of the VZ have shown two separate mitotic populations within the VZ in both mouse (Gal et al. 2006) and humans (Mo et al. 2007), and a new report has suggested that these two cell populations have a different response to the level of NICD/CBF1 signaling (Mizutani et al. 2007). Finally, although mice with mutations in different parts of the notch signaling pathway show some differences, the majority display a lack of NSC self-renewal and precocious neuronal differentiation (Yoon and Gaiano 2005). While development of the embryonic CNS is a dynamic process, it is clear that notch signaling regulates fundamental processes involved in brain development including NSC self-renewal, survival and differentiation.
Role of notch signaling cross-talk in NSC behavior
The regulation of NSC behaviors involves multiple signaling pathways, some of which interact with the notch signaling pathway; examples include sonic hedgehog, JAK/STAT, receptor tryosine kinase, TGF-β and Wnt (Hurlbut et al. 2007). There are several lines of evidence suggesting that notch can interact with growth factor and extracellular matrix signals within the NSC niche to promote self-renewal or differentiation. For instance, notch signaling was up-regulated in NSCs in vitro by the addition of either FGF1 or FGF2 (Faux et al. 2001), growth factors essential for self-renewal. The process of astrocyte differentiation from NSCs in vitro was promoted by notch cross-talk with ciliary neurotrophic factor which activates the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway (Nagao et al. 2007). Cross-talk between notch and epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling may also occur in NSCs because asymmetric cellular inheritance of notch and numb during asymmetric divisions is associated with asymmetric inheritance of the EGF receptor (Sun et al. 2005). More recently, cross-talk between notch, EGFR and β1 integrin in neural progenitor cells has been suggested by a physical interaction between NICD and the integrin cytoplasmic tail along with the presence of all three receptors within caveolin-containing lipid rafts (Campos et al. 2006). These studies provide evidence that during the complex process of embryonic neurogenesis, notch may not act alone in controlling NSC behavior and thus identification of additional members of the signaling nexus will be critical in elucidating the various roles of notch signaling in neurogenesis.
Notch in adult brain function
As described above, notch is a critical component of an evolutionarily conserved signaling mechanism that regulates many different stages of development. However, notch proteins and ligands are also expressed in cells of the adult nervous system (Presente et al. 2001), suggesting roles in CNS plasticity throughout life. The specific roles of notch in adult brain plasticity and neurological disorders have begun to be unraveled in recent years, and will be discussed in the following sections.
Axons and dendrites (neurites) are specialized and characteristic structures of a neuron that receive, integrate and transmit signals to other neurons. The complexity of connections between billions of neurons, and the intricate pattern of activity in the neuronal circuits, mediate all behaviors including learning and memory. As neurons differentiate from progenitor cells they rapidly grow neurites and form synapses with target neurons. A typical synapse consists of a pre-synaptic axon terminal specialized for the concentration and release of a neurotransmitter, and a post-synaptic dendritic spine which contains neurotransmitter receptors and downstream signaling molecules. Neurons in the mature nervous system are also capable of adaptive remodeling which can include neurite outgrowth or retraction, synapse formation or disassembly; and strengthening of existing synapses (Antonini and Stryker 1993; Yuste and Bonhoeffer 2001; Trachtenberg et al. 2002; Wong and Ghosh 2002; Carlisle and Kennedy 2005). Several studies found that notch signaling serves important functions in the regulation of neurite outgrowth and maintenance. Both Sestan et al. (1999) and Berezovska et al. (1999) found that notch activation inhibits neurite outgrowth or causes their retraction, whereas inhibition of notch-1 signaling promotes neurite extension. Redmond et al. (2000) found that NICD is translocated to the nucleus during neuronal differentiation where it may regulate the expression of genes that influence dendritic morphology. Increasing notch-1 signaling decreases average dendritic length, but increases dendritic branching. The effects of notch signaling on neurite plasticity may be relevant to the phenomenon of developmental pruning (Luo and O’Leary 2005), which selectively eliminates unneeded synapses during critical periods of development so as to generate highly refined mature neuronal circuits (Fig. 1). Although the molecular mechanism by which notch regulates neurite remodeling is not totally clear, lateral inhibition is one possibility.
Modification of neurite morphology could provide a mechanism by which notch regulates synaptic plasticity (Engert and Bonhoeffer 1999; Maletic-Savatic et al. 1999; Matsuzaki et al. 2004). Indeed, Wang et al. (2004) provided direct evidence that notch signaling is involved in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Long-term potentiation (LTP) is an experimentally-induced long-lasting increase in synaptic strength that is currently a prominent candidate mechanism of memory formation. Notch anti-sense transgenic (NAS) mice with an approximately 50% reduction of the notch level exhibited impaired LTP in response to high frequency stimulation, while maintaining normal basal synaptic transmission or paired-pulse facilitation. Long-term depression was enhanced in NAS mice. Perfusion of hippocampal slices with a notch ligand (Jagged peptide) enhanced LTP without affecting paired-pulse facilitation. Thus, notch signaling appears to enhance post-synaptic changes that mediate LTP.
Forebrain-specific conditional knockout of either notch or presenilin-1 results in learning and memory impairment in adult mice (Yu et al. 2001; Costa et al. 2003; Saura et al. 2004). The cognitive deficits in both presenilin-1 and notch null mice are restricted to both spatial learning and long-term memory, but not other forms of learning and not short-term memory. These results indicate that notch signaling is required for normal spatial learning and the formation of long- term memories. Evidence for an important role for notch signaling in long-term memory were also obtained in studies of Drosophila with a temperature sensitive notch mutation or with RNA intereference-based knockdown of notch expression (Ge et al. 2004; Presente et al. 2004).
Notch in neurological disorders
In light of the importance of notch signaling in various types of developmental events and synaptic plasticity, and data from other cellular systems suggesting that notch can regulate cell survival (Purow et al. 2005; Mason et al. 2006), several laboratories have been investigating the possible involvement of notch signaling in neurological disorders and cellular responses to CNS injury. The findings reviewed below suggest that the roles of notch signaling in CNS injury and disease are complex, involving multiple cell types (neurons, glial cells, vascular cells and lymphocytes), and either detrimental or beneficial actions on the pathogenic process and functional outcome.
Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephaly
Ischemic neuronal death results from oxygen and glucose deprivation and is believed to be mediated by oxidative stress and over-activation of glutamate receptors leading to either necrosis (cell swelling and membrane rupture) or apoptosis (mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and release of cytochrome c, and activation of caspases) (Marzo et al. 1998; Dirnagl et al. 1999; Mattson 2003;Mattson 2003). While reperfusion of the ischemic brain is desirable, the return of the blood supply can paradoxically trigger an intense oxidative and inflammatory response and causes additional injury to adjacent brain tissue. Therefore, the pathological processes in I/R injuries are complex and involve blood–brain barrier disruption, energy depletion, perturbed calcium homeostasis and excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, microglial activation and infiltration of proinflammatory leukocytes (Arumugam et al. 2005). A recent study (Arumugam et al. 2006) found that I/R can transiently activate γ-secretase which results in notch-1 cleavage and increased levels of NICD. The I/R-induced increase in NICD was significantly attenuated in NAS mice and in wild-type mice treated with γ-secretase inhibitors. Notch-1 antisense transgenic mice and normal mice treated with γ-secretase inhibitors exhibited less stroke-induced brain damage and improved functional outcome. Notch-1 signaling in neurons during ischemic conditions may enhance apoptotic signaling cascades in the neurons, while activation of notch-1 in microglial cells and leukocytes may exacerbate inflammatory processes that contribute to neuronal death (Fig. 1). Consistent with the latter findings are studies showing that notch-1 can activate T lymphocytes resulting cell proliferation and cytokine production (Eagar et al. 2004).
While notch-1 activation in neurons and inflammatory cells may worsen the outcome of a stroke, notch-1 signaling in NSC and progenitor cells might promote recovery. Adult NSCs undergo the transition from proliferation to differentiation, and may provide a reservoir of cells capable of forming new neurons that may eventually integrate into neuronal circuits (Garcia-Verdugo et al. 1998; Cage 2000). Accumulating evidence indicates that stroke induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion leads to increased NSC proliferation and differentiation into new neurons in the ipsilateral SVZ (Jin et al. 2001; Zhang et al. 2001; Arvidsson et al. 2002; Parent et al. 2002; Takasawa et al. 2002). These newly generated neurons are mobilized to the damaged striatal area (Arvidsson et al. 2002; Parent et al. 2002). Moreover, an array of factors including growth factors such as bFGF (Jin et al. 2002) and brain derived neurotrophic factor (Zigova et al. 1998; Pencea et al. 2001), glutamate (Bernabeu and Sharp 2000; Arvidsson et al. 2001) and erythropoietin (Shingo et al. 2001) may regulate neurogenesis following cerebral ischemia. A recent study (Androutsellis-Theotokis et al. 2006) found that notch signaling is also important in regulating neurogenesis and the functional recovery in rodents with brain damage from stroke. In contrast to the effect of notch signaling in cortical neurons (Arumugam et al. 2006), activation of notch receptor by treatment with an exogenous notch ligand promotes NSC survival, while γ-secretase inhibitors antagonize the effects of the notch-1 ligand on NSC. Rapid activation of cytoplasmic signaling thorough PI3 kinase-Akt, the transcription factor STAT3, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) mediates the notch-1 activation signaling that promotes the survival of NSCs. Delayed treatment with agents that activate notch-1 may therefore promote recovery of function following a stroke. Clearly, a better understanding of notch signaling in the various cell types affected in a stroke will be required in order to develop therapeutic interventions that target notch signaling for the treatment of stroke.
The major age-related neurodegenerative disorders, AD and Parkinson’s disease, are becoming more common as the average lifespan increases. Less common, but equally devastating to the patient and their loved ones are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington’s disease (HD). There is considerable reason to believe that notch-1 signaling influences the disease process in AD, but little is known concerning the possible involvement of notch-1 in Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and HD. AD is characterized by accumulation of the amyloid β-peptide (Aβ), synaptic dysfunction and degeneration, inflammation and death of neurons in brain regions involved in learning and memory processes (Mattson 2004). The fact that presenilin-1/γ-secretase is responsible for cleavage the amyloid precursor protein (APP) to generate Aβ, and also cleaves notch-1 to generate NICD has raised considerable interest in elucidating the roles of notch-1 signaling in AD.
Immunohistochemical analysis of postmortem hippocampal specimens suggest that levels of notch-1 are increased in this brain region in AD and Pick’s disease (Nagarsheth et al. 2006). Down syndrome patients exhibit mental retardation and develop AD-like pathology. Analysis of the expression of notch-1 target genes in postmortem brain tissue and fibroblasts from Down syndrome patients provided evidence for hyperactivation of the notch-1 signaling pathway in Down syndrome (Fischer et al. 2005). Data from the latter study revealed a similar increase in the expression of notch-1 and notch-1 target genes in brain tissue from AD patients and, moreover, suggested an interaction between notch-1 signaling and amyloidogenesis. Other studies have indeed demonstrated a direct interaction of APP with notch-1, and with notch-2 as well (Oh et al. 2005). The role of the APP – notch interaction in AD and related disorders is as yet unknown. Similar to the generation of Aβ upon cleavage of APP by γ-secretase, cleavage of Notch-1 by γ-secretase results in the release of a notch-1 Aβ-like peptide (Okochi et al. 2006). The amount of the notch-1 Aβ-like peptide produced is increased in cells expressing AD-linked presenilin-1 mutations.
Notch and CNS cancers
Considerable evidence suggests that notch signaling plays a critical role in tumor progression in a variety of organ systems throughout the body (Miele et al. 2006; Roy et al. 2007). There are several lines of evidence to suggest that notch signaling also plays a role in brain tumor progression. However, before discussing the critical studies of notch and CNS tumors, it is worth noting the view on brain tumors has gone through a renaissance over the past decade. The prevailing view is that a common type of brain cancer, glioma, is propagated by a small population of cancer stem cells which have the ability to self-renew and differentiate into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (Dirks 2006; Nakano and Kornblum 2006). Interestingly, these cancer stem cells are responsive to factors such as bone morphogenic proteins, which are known to play key roles in the regulation of embryonic and adult NSC populations (Piccirillo et al. 2006). Given the importance of notch signaling in CNS development, it would be reasonable to predict that notch signaling also regulates cancer stem cells and brain tumor progression. This does, indeed, appear to be the case because analysis of a variety of human brain tumors has suggested that Dll3 is a good clinical marker of proneural gliomas (Phillips et al. 2006). In addition, human brain tumor-derived cancer cell clones express delta and jagged 1, while jagged 2 expression was decreased in comparison to clones derived from neurogenic regions (Ignatova et al. 2002). In a long-term human glioma culture system, notch signaling (notch 1, 2, 3, hes 1, 2, 4) is also increased (Shiras et al. 2007).
Notch signaling has been suggested a therapeutic target for medulloblastomas because treatment with a γ-secretase inhibitor results in a decrease in the total number of cancer stem cells and inhibition of tumor progression (Fan et al. 2006). However, it is worth noting that the blockade of notch signaling has not been assessed on tumor progression or the cancer stem cell population in gliomas, although the use of γ-secretase inhibitors as a putative cancer therapy has been suggested (Shih Ie and Wang 2007). These studies confirm that notch signaling is involved in CNS tumors (Fig. 1) and suggest that by further elucidating these pathways, a better understanding of brain cancers and development of novel therapeutic agents that modify notch signaling are possible.
The elucidation of the role of notch signaling during CNS development, and the association of notch-related pathways with neurological disorders, has proven to be both scientifically interesting and of biomedical importance. Future studies in both physiological and pathological roles for notch signaling will benefit from more in-depth analysis of its molecular interactions in development and adult neuroplasticity. Among the questions that remain to be answered are as follows: (i) what molecular mechanisms mediate activity-dependent notch activation?; (ii) what gene targets of notch are responsible for the morphological and functional consequences of notch signaling in normal and disease states; (iii) how does the notch signaling pathway interact with other signaling pathways in neurons and glial cells?
The mechanisms by which notch regulates synaptic plasticity are unknown. The transcription factor NF-κB may be one mediator of the effects of notch signaling on synaptic plasticity because NF-κB is reduced in NAS mice (Wang et al. 2004) and NF-κB can enhance LTP and is important for learning and memory (Mattson and Meffert 2006). Ras signaling, which is critical for many morphological and functional responses of neurons to neurotrophic factors, has been shown to modulate and be modulated by notch signaling (Ordentlich et al. 1998; Berset et al. 2001; Weijzen et al. 2002). In addition, cAMP response element-binding protein transcription is NMDA receptor-dependent and increases presenilin-1 expression, which could be important for γ-secretase cleavage of notch (Mitsuda et al. 2001). Understanding how notch signaling interacts with modulators of NF-κB, cAMP response element-binding protein, Ras and calcium signaling could be very important in understanding developmental and synaptic plasticity.
The roles of notch signaling in neurological disorders are complex, involving multiple cell types in ways that may either worsen or improve the outcome. Activation of notch in neurons increases their vulnerability to ischemic injury, and activation of notch in microglia and lymphocytes may promote damaging inflammatory processes (Arumugam et al. 2006). On the other hand, notch may play a pivotal role in injury-induced neurogenesis, thereby promoting recovery of function (Androutsellis-Theotokis et al. 2006). Finally, notch signaling is emerging as an important factor in the development of CNS tumors. The identification of human CNS cancer stem cells has so far been based on their expression of prominin-1 (CD133) (Singh et al. 2003, 2004; Bao et al. 2006). Given the evidence that notch signaling is high in cancer stem cells, selection strategies based on notch expression, which has been used for embryonic CNS stem cells (Nagato et al. 2005; Basak and Taylor 2007) could also be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify CNS cancer stem cells. It will also be important to establish which cells express notch and notch ligands within an intact CNS tumor. From a therapeutic perspective it may be possible to develop selective inhibitors or activators of notch signaling. The development of γ-secretase inhibitors with differential effects on APP and notch processing suggests the feasibility of developing notch-specific inhibitors.
We would like to apologize to all those whose work we could not include due to space limitations. We would like to thank K.C. Alexander (NIA) for assistance with the illustrations. This work was supported by the NIA Intramural Research Program. J.D.L. is supported by the NIH-Cambridge Graduate Partnership Program.